Effect of uterine peristalsis at the time of embryo transfer on the outcomes of IVF cycles: a prospective cohort study.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Karim S Abdallah, Kamal M Zahran, Mahmoud A Othman, Ahmed Nasr
{"title":"Effect of uterine peristalsis at the time of embryo transfer on the outcomes of IVF cycles: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Karim S Abdallah, Kamal M Zahran, Mahmoud A Othman, Ahmed Nasr","doi":"10.1186/s12958-026-01587-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has recently been discovered that one of the key elements influencing endometrial receptivity is uterine peristalsis. This was a prospective cohort study aiming to assess uterine peristalsis at the time of embryo transfer in women undergoing IVF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Uterine peristaltic waves were assessed using transvaginal ultrasound by recording a 3-minute video to determine the frequency and the direction of peristalsis. Primary outcome was clinical pregnancy while secondary outcomes were biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and live birth. Outcomes were compared in women who had no peristalsis (Absent group), had one or two waves per minute (< 3 Group), or those who had 3 or more waves per minute (≥ 3 Group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between August 2023 and January 2025, 127 women were included in this study, of whom 76 (59.8%) were fresh cycles and 51 (40.2%) were frozen cycles. The median number of peristaltic waves was one per minute. Peristalsis was absent in 34 women, < 3 in 72 women and ≥ 3 in 21 women. There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rate between the three groups (26.1% in absent group, 36.1% in < 3 group, and 33.3% in ≥ 3 group). The direction was cervico-fundal in 62 women, fundo-cervical in 5 women, and random in 26 women, with pregnancy rates 22%, 0% and 11%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find a significant effect of the number or the direction of uterine peristalsis on any of the clinical outcomes of IVF. Therefore, we do not recommend its routine assessment before embryo transfer until further evidence is available.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was registered on 14 September 2023 at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration number NCT06036459).</p>","PeriodicalId":21011,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13352654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-026-01587-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It has recently been discovered that one of the key elements influencing endometrial receptivity is uterine peristalsis. This was a prospective cohort study aiming to assess uterine peristalsis at the time of embryo transfer in women undergoing IVF.

Methods: Uterine peristaltic waves were assessed using transvaginal ultrasound by recording a 3-minute video to determine the frequency and the direction of peristalsis. Primary outcome was clinical pregnancy while secondary outcomes were biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and live birth. Outcomes were compared in women who had no peristalsis (Absent group), had one or two waves per minute (< 3 Group), or those who had 3 or more waves per minute (≥ 3 Group).

Results: Between August 2023 and January 2025, 127 women were included in this study, of whom 76 (59.8%) were fresh cycles and 51 (40.2%) were frozen cycles. The median number of peristaltic waves was one per minute. Peristalsis was absent in 34 women, < 3 in 72 women and ≥ 3 in 21 women. There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rate between the three groups (26.1% in absent group, 36.1% in < 3 group, and 33.3% in ≥ 3 group). The direction was cervico-fundal in 62 women, fundo-cervical in 5 women, and random in 26 women, with pregnancy rates 22%, 0% and 11%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference.

Conclusion: We did not find a significant effect of the number or the direction of uterine peristalsis on any of the clinical outcomes of IVF. Therefore, we do not recommend its routine assessment before embryo transfer until further evidence is available.

Trial registration: The study protocol was registered on 14 September 2023 at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration number NCT06036459).

胚胎移植时子宫蠕动对体外受精周期结果的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:近年来发现影响子宫内膜容受性的关键因素之一是子宫蠕动。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在评估接受体外受精的妇女胚胎移植时的子宫蠕动。方法:经阴道超声检查子宫蠕动波,录像3分钟,确定蠕动频率和方向。主要结局为临床妊娠,次要结局为生化妊娠、流产、异位妊娠和活产。结果比较了无蠕动(缺席组),每分钟有1或2波的妇女(结果:在2023年8月至2025年1月期间,127名妇女纳入本研究,其中76名(59.8%)为新鲜周期,51名(40.2%)为冷冻周期。肠蠕动波的中位数为每分钟一次。结论:我们没有发现子宫蠕动的数量和方向对IVF的任何临床结果有显著影响。因此,我们不建议在胚胎移植前进行常规评估,直到有进一步的证据。试验注册:研究方案于2023年9月14日在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(注册号NCT06036459)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology publishes and disseminates high-quality results from excellent research in the reproductive sciences. The journal publishes on topics covering gametogenesis, fertilization, early embryonic development, embryo-uterus interaction, reproductive development, pregnancy, uterine biology, endocrinology of reproduction, control of reproduction, reproductive immunology, neuroendocrinology, and veterinary and human reproductive medicine, including all vertebrate species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书