Artificial Intelligence-Based Automatic Screening System for Hip Dysplasia

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kazuki Miyama, Kenji Kitamura, Masanori Fujii, Goro Motomura, Satoshi Hamai, Shinya Kawahara, Ryosuke Yamaguchi, Takeshi Utsunomiya, Soichiro Yoshino, Makoto Endo, Yasuharu Nakashima
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence-Based Automatic Screening System for Hip Dysplasia","authors":"Kazuki Miyama,&nbsp;Kenji Kitamura,&nbsp;Masanori Fujii,&nbsp;Goro Motomura,&nbsp;Satoshi Hamai,&nbsp;Shinya Kawahara,&nbsp;Ryosuke Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Takeshi Utsunomiya,&nbsp;Soichiro Yoshino,&nbsp;Makoto Endo,&nbsp;Yasuharu Nakashima","doi":"10.1002/jor.70251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To develop an artificial intelligence-based radiographic screening system for hip dysplasia and to evaluate its diagnostic performance and clinical utility. Seventy-three patients with hip dysplasia who underwent unilateral periacetabular osteotomy and 29 asymptomatic volunteers were included. Radiographs from patients with hip dysplasia were divided into training (<i>n</i> = 40), validation (<i>n</i> = 7), and testing (<i>n</i> = 26) datasets, whereas radiographs from volunteers were used exclusively for testing. The artificial intelligence system detects and segments anatomical landmarks on pelvic radiographs, quantifies parameters reflecting anterior, posterior, and lateral acetabular coverage, and determines whether a patient has hip dysplasia based on these measurements. It comprises two deep learning models: DeepLabCut and U-Net, which can effectively learn anatomical structures from relatively small training data. Ground-truth measurements were obtained from repeated assessments by a hip surgeon and a non-hip surgeon, and hip dysplasia status was independently determined by two hip surgeons in blinded assessments. Agreement with the ground-truth was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, and screening performance was compared with that of general orthopaedic residents using the test images. Agreement with the ground-truth was good to excellent [intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.70–0.95]. The system showed the best overall screening performance (sensitivity, 0.96 vs. 0.44–0.97; specificity, 0.92 vs. 0.16–0.92; area under the curve, 0.94 vs. 0.57–0.76; F-measure, 0.96 vs. 0.60–0.81) compared with the residents. Our artificial intelligence-based screening system may serve as a primary care-oriented radiographic screening and referral-support tool for clinicians, including non-specialists, despite being trained on a limited dataset.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":"44 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.70251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To develop an artificial intelligence-based radiographic screening system for hip dysplasia and to evaluate its diagnostic performance and clinical utility. Seventy-three patients with hip dysplasia who underwent unilateral periacetabular osteotomy and 29 asymptomatic volunteers were included. Radiographs from patients with hip dysplasia were divided into training (n = 40), validation (n = 7), and testing (n = 26) datasets, whereas radiographs from volunteers were used exclusively for testing. The artificial intelligence system detects and segments anatomical landmarks on pelvic radiographs, quantifies parameters reflecting anterior, posterior, and lateral acetabular coverage, and determines whether a patient has hip dysplasia based on these measurements. It comprises two deep learning models: DeepLabCut and U-Net, which can effectively learn anatomical structures from relatively small training data. Ground-truth measurements were obtained from repeated assessments by a hip surgeon and a non-hip surgeon, and hip dysplasia status was independently determined by two hip surgeons in blinded assessments. Agreement with the ground-truth was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, and screening performance was compared with that of general orthopaedic residents using the test images. Agreement with the ground-truth was good to excellent [intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.70–0.95]. The system showed the best overall screening performance (sensitivity, 0.96 vs. 0.44–0.97; specificity, 0.92 vs. 0.16–0.92; area under the curve, 0.94 vs. 0.57–0.76; F-measure, 0.96 vs. 0.60–0.81) compared with the residents. Our artificial intelligence-based screening system may serve as a primary care-oriented radiographic screening and referral-support tool for clinicians, including non-specialists, despite being trained on a limited dataset.

基于人工智能的髋关节发育不良自动筛查系统。
开发基于人工智能的髋关节发育不良放射筛查系统,并评估其诊断性能和临床应用。73例髋关节发育不良患者行单侧髋臼周围截骨术,29例无症状志愿者。来自髋关节发育不良患者的x线片被分为训练(n = 40)、验证(n = 7)和测试(n = 26)数据集,而来自志愿者的x线片仅用于测试。人工智能系统检测并分割骨盆x线片上的解剖标志,量化反映髋臼前部、后部和外侧覆盖范围的参数,并根据这些测量结果确定患者是否患有髋关节发育不良。它包括两个深度学习模型:DeepLabCut和U-Net,可以从相对较小的训练数据中有效地学习解剖结构。通过髋关节外科医生和非髋关节外科医生的重复评估获得基本事实测量值,髋关节发育不良状态由两名髋关节外科医生在盲法评估中独立确定。使用类内相关系数评估与基本事实的一致性,并使用测试图像将筛选性能与普通骨科住院医师的筛选性能进行比较。与基本事实的一致性从好到优[类内相关系数:0.70-0.95]。与居民相比,该系统显示出最佳的总体筛选性能(灵敏度0.96比0.44-0.97;特异性0.92比0.16-0.92;曲线下面积0.94比0.57-0.76;f测量值0.96比0.60-0.81)。我们基于人工智能的筛查系统可以作为临床医生(包括非专业医生)的初级保健放射筛查和转诊支持工具,尽管在有限的数据集上进行了培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书