A point prevalence survey on antibiotic dispensing practices identifies targets for quality improvement of antimicrobial stewardship in community pharmacies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

IF 2.6 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2026-07-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2026.2691452
Mary Migiro, Mtebe Majigo, Agricola Joachim, Doreen Kamori, Salim Masoud, Upendo Kibwana, Bjørn Blomberg, Joel Manyahi
{"title":"A point prevalence survey on antibiotic dispensing practices identifies targets for quality improvement of antimicrobial stewardship in community pharmacies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.","authors":"Mary Migiro, Mtebe Majigo, Agricola Joachim, Doreen Kamori, Salim Masoud, Upendo Kibwana, Bjørn Blomberg, Joel Manyahi","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2026.2691452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inappropriate antibiotic use is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where over-the-counter antibiotics are readily available without a prescription. This study assessed antibiotic dispensing practices in community pharmacies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>From February to March 2025, a point prevalence survey was conducted in 100 community pharmacies in Dar es Salaam. Researchers approached existing customers, obtained consent, and conducted confidential interviews. Five participants were enrolled per pharmacy, for a total of 500 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 64% (320/500) of community pharmacy attendees were dispensed antibiotics, of whom 71% (227/320) received them without a prescription. Access-group antibiotics were most frequently dispensed (56%, 201/356), followed by Watch (32%, 115/356) and Reserve groups (3%, 10/356), with metronidazole (15%, 53/356) and azithromycin (12%, 44/356) being the most commonly dispensed antibiotics. Urinary tract infection (UTI) was the leading indication (37%, 119/320), mainly treated with azithromycin (25%, 35/138), ciprofloxacin (12%, 16/138), and nitrofurantoin (7%, 9/138). Among antibiotic recipients, 44% (140/320) received antibiotics based on dispensers' recommendations. Ceftriaxone was commonly dispensed with prescriptions, while all Reserve antibiotics were dispensed without prescriptions. Participants with technical/vocational education (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 1.38, 95% CI: 1.13-1.68, <i>p</i> = 0.001) were more likely to be dispensed antibiotics than those with no formal education or primary and secondary education, and a borderline association was found for college/university education (aPR, 1.22, 95% CI: 0.99 - 1.48, p = 0.05). The presence of an underlying medical condition was an independent protective factor against antibiotic dispensing (aPR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.49-0.88; <i>p</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most clients attending community pharmacies in Dar es Salaam receive antibiotics without prescriptions, often based on dispensers' recommendations. The widespread use of Watch and Reserve antibiotics without oversight highlights major regulatory gaps and the urgent need for stronger policy enforcement and antimicrobial stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"2691452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13353435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2026.2691452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use is a major driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where over-the-counter antibiotics are readily available without a prescription. This study assessed antibiotic dispensing practices in community pharmacies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Methodology: From February to March 2025, a point prevalence survey was conducted in 100 community pharmacies in Dar es Salaam. Researchers approached existing customers, obtained consent, and conducted confidential interviews. Five participants were enrolled per pharmacy, for a total of 500 participants.

Results: Overall, 64% (320/500) of community pharmacy attendees were dispensed antibiotics, of whom 71% (227/320) received them without a prescription. Access-group antibiotics were most frequently dispensed (56%, 201/356), followed by Watch (32%, 115/356) and Reserve groups (3%, 10/356), with metronidazole (15%, 53/356) and azithromycin (12%, 44/356) being the most commonly dispensed antibiotics. Urinary tract infection (UTI) was the leading indication (37%, 119/320), mainly treated with azithromycin (25%, 35/138), ciprofloxacin (12%, 16/138), and nitrofurantoin (7%, 9/138). Among antibiotic recipients, 44% (140/320) received antibiotics based on dispensers' recommendations. Ceftriaxone was commonly dispensed with prescriptions, while all Reserve antibiotics were dispensed without prescriptions. Participants with technical/vocational education (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 1.38, 95% CI: 1.13-1.68, p = 0.001) were more likely to be dispensed antibiotics than those with no formal education or primary and secondary education, and a borderline association was found for college/university education (aPR, 1.22, 95% CI: 0.99 - 1.48, p = 0.05). The presence of an underlying medical condition was an independent protective factor against antibiotic dispensing (aPR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.49-0.88; p = 0.005).

Conclusion: Most clients attending community pharmacies in Dar es Salaam receive antibiotics without prescriptions, often based on dispensers' recommendations. The widespread use of Watch and Reserve antibiotics without oversight highlights major regulatory gaps and the urgent need for stronger policy enforcement and antimicrobial stewardship.

一项关于抗生素配药做法的点流行率调查确定了坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆社区药房抗菌药物管理质量改进的目标。
背景:抗生素使用不当是抗菌素耐药性的主要驱动因素,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,在这些国家,无需处方即可随时获得非处方抗生素。本研究评估了坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆社区药房的抗生素配药做法。方法:于2025年2月至3月对达累斯萨拉姆100家社区药店进行点流行调查。研究人员接触了现有客户,获得了他们的同意,并进行了保密访谈。每个药房有五名参与者,总共有500名参与者。结果:总体而言,64%(320/500)的社区药房参与者获得了抗生素,其中71%(227/320)的人在没有处方的情况下获得了抗生素。使用频率最高的是准入组抗生素(56%,201/356),其次是观察组(32%,115/356)和储备组(3%,10/356),其中甲硝唑(15%,53/356)和阿奇霉素(12%,44/356)是最常用的抗生素。尿路感染是主要适应症(37%,119/320),主要治疗药物为阿奇霉素(25%,35/138)、环丙沙星(12%,16/138)和呋喃妥因(7%,9/138)。在抗生素接受者中,44%(140/320)根据配药员的建议服用了抗生素。头孢曲松常用处方配药,储备类抗生素均无处方配药。接受过技术/职业教育的参与者(调整患病率[aPR], 1.38, 95% CI: 1.13-1.68, p = 0.001)比没有接受过正规教育或小学和中学教育的参与者更有可能被分配抗生素,并且发现学院/大学教育的参与者与抗生素分配存在边缘关联(aPR, 1.22, 95% CI: 0.99 - 1.48, p = 0.05)。潜在医疗状况的存在是对抗生素分配的独立保护因素(aPR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.49-0.88; p = 0.005)。结论:在达累斯萨拉姆的社区药房,大多数客户在没有处方的情况下获得抗生素,通常是根据配药人员的建议。在没有监督的情况下广泛使用观察和储备抗生素,凸显了监管方面的重大空白,迫切需要加强政策执行和抗微生物药物管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书