Stress distribution in miniscrews with different insertion angles: A finite element analysis study.

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2026-05-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_200_25
Rishibha Bhardwaj, Dhara Shukla, P C Ramesh Kumar, Rohit Bahri, Naveen R Reddy, Snigdha Pattanaik, Azhar Mohammed, A N Prakruti
{"title":"Stress distribution in miniscrews with different insertion angles: A finite element analysis study.","authors":"Rishibha Bhardwaj, Dhara Shukla, P C Ramesh Kumar, Rohit Bahri, Naveen R Reddy, Snigdha Pattanaik, Azhar Mohammed, A N Prakruti","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_200_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Orthodontic miniscrews serve as critical temporary anchorage devices (TADs), but their clinical success is often limited by biomechanical instability. This research was done to evaluate the biomechanical impact of different miniscrew insertion angles on stress distribution and micromotion using finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>FEA was performed on a total of 225 mandibular models derived from cone beam computed tomography scans of Indian adults. Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) miniscrews with Sandblasted, Large-grit, Acidsurface modification was inserted at angles of 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°. Each setup was subjected to vertical and oblique orthodontic loads of 2 N and 5 N. Stress, displacement, and micromotion were analyzed, and the obtained data were statistically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Miniscrew insertion at 45° demonstrated the most favorable biomechanical profile, with the lowest von Mises stress (61.2 MPa), minimal micromotion (0.033 mm), and optimal stress distribution. Insertion angle had a significant effect on stress (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and regression analysis identified insertion angle and bone density as significant predictors of stress and micromotion (adjusted <i>R</i>² = 0.89). The odds of failure due to high stress and micromotion were highest at insertion angles of 90° and 30°, respectively. Multivariate regression revealed that both insertion angle and bone density significantly influenced miniscrew stress and micromotion, with optimal 45° angulation and higher bone density minimizing failure risk (adjusted <i>R</i>² = 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 45° insertion angle offers biomechanical superiority for miniscrew placement, reducing stress concentrations and the risk of micromotion. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for clinical orthodontic practice, particularly in Indian populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"15 ","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13354140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_200_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Orthodontic miniscrews serve as critical temporary anchorage devices (TADs), but their clinical success is often limited by biomechanical instability. This research was done to evaluate the biomechanical impact of different miniscrew insertion angles on stress distribution and micromotion using finite element analysis (FEA).

Methodology: FEA was performed on a total of 225 mandibular models derived from cone beam computed tomography scans of Indian adults. Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) miniscrews with Sandblasted, Large-grit, Acidsurface modification was inserted at angles of 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°. Each setup was subjected to vertical and oblique orthodontic loads of 2 N and 5 N. Stress, displacement, and micromotion were analyzed, and the obtained data were statistically evaluated.

Results: Miniscrew insertion at 45° demonstrated the most favorable biomechanical profile, with the lowest von Mises stress (61.2 MPa), minimal micromotion (0.033 mm), and optimal stress distribution. Insertion angle had a significant effect on stress (P < 0.001), and regression analysis identified insertion angle and bone density as significant predictors of stress and micromotion (adjusted R² = 0.89). The odds of failure due to high stress and micromotion were highest at insertion angles of 90° and 30°, respectively. Multivariate regression revealed that both insertion angle and bone density significantly influenced miniscrew stress and micromotion, with optimal 45° angulation and higher bone density minimizing failure risk (adjusted R² = 0.89).

Conclusion: A 45° insertion angle offers biomechanical superiority for miniscrew placement, reducing stress concentrations and the risk of micromotion. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for clinical orthodontic practice, particularly in Indian populations.

不同插入角度微型螺钉的应力分布:有限元分析研究。
背景/目的:正畸微型支架作为关键的临时锚固装置(TADs),但其临床成功往往受到生物力学不稳定性的限制。采用有限元分析方法研究不同微钉插入角度对应力分布和微运动的生物力学影响。方法:对225个来自印度成年人锥形束计算机断层扫描的下颌模型进行有限元分析。喷砂、大粒度、酸性表面改性的钛合金(Ti-6Al-4V)微型螺钉以30°、45°、60°和90°的角度插入。每个组分别承受2 N和5 N的垂直和斜向正畸载荷,分析应力、位移和微动,并对所得数据进行统计评估。结果:45°置入的微型支架具有最佳的生物力学特征,von Mises应力最低(61.2 MPa),微动最小(0.033 mm),应力分布最佳。插入角度对应力有显著影响(P < 0.001),回归分析发现插入角度和骨密度是应力和微动的显著预测因子(调整后R²= 0.89)。在插入角度分别为90°和30°时,高应力和微动导致失效的几率最高。多因素回归显示,插入角度和骨密度对微关节应力和微运动均有显著影响,最佳的45°角度和较高的骨密度可使失效风险最小(调整后R²= 0.89)。结论:45°的置入角度为微型置入提供了生物力学优势,减少了应力集中和微动风险。这些发现为临床正畸实践提供了循证指导,特别是在印度人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书