Recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis burden and precipitant patterns in established type 1 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections: an 11-year retrospective single-center study.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ruixia Liu, Tianrong Pan
{"title":"Recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis burden and precipitant patterns in established type 1 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections: an 11-year retrospective single-center study.","authors":"Ruixia Liu, Tianrong Pan","doi":"10.1186/s12902-026-02419-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) remains a major acute complication in people with established type 1 diabetes, but whether recurrent DKA burden and precipitant patterns differ by insulin-delivery modality is not well defined. We compared recurrent DKA burden and precipitant patterns between continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injections (MDI), and evaluated severity and short-term outcomes of index eligible admissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively screened DKA hospitalizations in patients with type 1 diabetes between 2014 and 2024. Admissions at initial type 1 diabetes diagnosis, those involving preadmission insulin regimens other than CSII or basal-bolus MDI, and records insufficient to assess key variables or outcomes were excluded. Index-admission analyses used treatment modality at the earliest eligible hospitalization (CSII, n = 33; MDI, n = 95). Patient-level recurrence analyses used predominant modality across eligible hospitalizations (CSII, n = 35; MDI, n = 93). Recurrent DKA was defined as at least two eligible admissions. Logistic regression was used for adjusted analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort comprised 180 eligible DKA hospitalizations in 128 patients. Recurrent admissions accounted for 52/180 hospitalizations (28.9%), and 30/128 patients (23.4%) experienced recurrent DKA. In the primary patient-level analysis, recurrent DKA was more frequent in CSII than in MDI (13/35 [37.1%] vs. 17/93 [18.3%]); the adjusted odds ratio was 2.64 (95% confidence interval 1.07-6.55; P = 0.036). In index admissions, hospital stay was shorter in CSII than in MDI (7.0 [5.0, 9.0] vs. 9.0 [7.0, 11.0] days; P = 0.006). Among adults, CSII was independently associated with lower odds of severe DKA (adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.77; P = 0.012). Recorded precipitating factors were summarized descriptively. Among recurrent CSII admissions, device/infusion-related failure was recorded in 7/30 admissions (23.3%); among recurrent MDI admissions, infection/intercurrent illness and insulin omission/insufficiency were recorded in 10/22 (45.5%) and 6/22 (27.3%) admissions, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with established type 1 diabetes who had experienced at least one DKA hospitalization, recurrent DKA was common. Recurrence was more frequent among patients classified as CSII users in the primary analysis, although the strength and statistical significance of this association varied across sensitivity analyses. Recorded precipitating factors suggested treatment-specific clinical contexts and should be interpreted descriptively.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13644273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-026-02419-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) remains a major acute complication in people with established type 1 diabetes, but whether recurrent DKA burden and precipitant patterns differ by insulin-delivery modality is not well defined. We compared recurrent DKA burden and precipitant patterns between continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injections (MDI), and evaluated severity and short-term outcomes of index eligible admissions.

Methods: We retrospectively screened DKA hospitalizations in patients with type 1 diabetes between 2014 and 2024. Admissions at initial type 1 diabetes diagnosis, those involving preadmission insulin regimens other than CSII or basal-bolus MDI, and records insufficient to assess key variables or outcomes were excluded. Index-admission analyses used treatment modality at the earliest eligible hospitalization (CSII, n = 33; MDI, n = 95). Patient-level recurrence analyses used predominant modality across eligible hospitalizations (CSII, n = 35; MDI, n = 93). Recurrent DKA was defined as at least two eligible admissions. Logistic regression was used for adjusted analyses.

Results: The cohort comprised 180 eligible DKA hospitalizations in 128 patients. Recurrent admissions accounted for 52/180 hospitalizations (28.9%), and 30/128 patients (23.4%) experienced recurrent DKA. In the primary patient-level analysis, recurrent DKA was more frequent in CSII than in MDI (13/35 [37.1%] vs. 17/93 [18.3%]); the adjusted odds ratio was 2.64 (95% confidence interval 1.07-6.55; P = 0.036). In index admissions, hospital stay was shorter in CSII than in MDI (7.0 [5.0, 9.0] vs. 9.0 [7.0, 11.0] days; P = 0.006). Among adults, CSII was independently associated with lower odds of severe DKA (adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.77; P = 0.012). Recorded precipitating factors were summarized descriptively. Among recurrent CSII admissions, device/infusion-related failure was recorded in 7/30 admissions (23.3%); among recurrent MDI admissions, infection/intercurrent illness and insulin omission/insufficiency were recorded in 10/22 (45.5%) and 6/22 (27.3%) admissions, respectively.

Conclusions: Among patients with established type 1 diabetes who had experienced at least one DKA hospitalization, recurrent DKA was common. Recurrence was more frequent among patients classified as CSII users in the primary analysis, although the strength and statistical significance of this association varied across sensitivity analyses. Recorded precipitating factors suggested treatment-specific clinical contexts and should be interpreted descriptively.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

持续皮下胰岛素输注与每日多次注射的1型糖尿病患者复发性糖尿病酮症酸中毒负担和沉淀模式:一项11年的回顾性单中心研究
背景:糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)仍然是1型糖尿病患者的主要急性并发症,但复发性DKA的负担和发作模式是否因胰岛素给药方式而异尚不清楚。我们比较了持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)和多次每日注射(MDI)的复发性DKA负担和沉淀模式,并评估了指数符合条件的入院患者的严重程度和短期结局。方法:回顾性筛选2014年至2024年间1型糖尿病患者的DKA住院情况。排除了1型糖尿病初始诊断入院,包括入院前胰岛素治疗方案,而不是CSII或基础剂量MDI,以及不足以评估关键变量或结果的记录。指标入院分析采用符合条件的最早住院时的治疗方式(CSII, n = 33; MDI, n = 95)。患者水平的复发分析在符合条件的住院治疗中使用主要模式(CSII, n = 35; MDI, n = 93)。复发性DKA定义为至少两次符合条件的入院。采用Logistic回归进行调整分析。结果:该队列包括180名符合DKA住院条件的128名患者。复发住院患者占52/180(28.9%),复发DKA患者占30/128(23.4%)。在初级患者水平分析中,复发性DKA在CSII中比在MDI中更常见(13/35[37.1%]对17/93 [18.3%]);校正后的优势比为2.64(95%可信区间1.07 ~ 6.55;P = 0.036)。在指数入院中,CSII患者住院时间短于MDI患者(7.0 [5.0,9.0]vs. 9.0[7.0, 11.0]天;P = 0.006)。在成人中,CSII与较低的严重DKA发生率独立相关(校正优势比0.30,95%可信区间0.11-0.77;P = 0.012)。对记录的降水因子进行了描述性总结。在复发性CSII住院患者中,器械/输注相关的失败记录在7/30的住院患者中(23.3%);在MDI复发入院中,感染/合并疾病和胰岛素遗漏/不足分别占10/22(45.5%)和6/22(27.3%)。结论:在至少经历过一次DKA住院治疗的1型糖尿病患者中,复发性DKA很常见。在初步分析中,被分类为CSII使用者的患者复发率更高,尽管这种关联的强度和统计学意义在敏感性分析中有所不同。记录的诱发因素提示治疗特异性临床背景,应描述性解释。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书