Effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-24 DOI:10.20524/aog.2026.1067
Konstantinos Malandris, Savvas Papachristou, Lito Psychou Derka, Georgios Kalopitas, Eleni Gkoura, Aris Liakos, Thomas Karagiannis, Eleni Theocharidou, Anastasios Manolakis, Eleni Bekiari, Apostolos Tsapas
{"title":"Effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Konstantinos Malandris, Savvas Papachristou, Lito Psychou Derka, Georgios Kalopitas, Eleni Gkoura, Aris Liakos, Thomas Karagiannis, Eleni Theocharidou, Anastasios Manolakis, Eleni Bekiari, Apostolos Tsapas","doi":"10.20524/aog.2026.1067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) delay gastric emptying, raising concerns about potential aspiration risk during upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of GLP-1 RA therapy on procedural outcomes in patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline and Cochrane library up to July 2025 without restrictions. Eligible studies evaluated patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy, comparing those taking GLP-1 RAs with those who were not. Outcomes of interest were the incidence of retained gastric contents (RGC), bronchopulmonary aspiration, and procedure discontinuation. Pooled estimates are expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using a random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four observational studies, predominantly retrospective, met the inclusion criteria: these comprised 184,707 participants, of whom 59,095 were taking GLP-1 RAs. Mean age was 58.7 years, 48.8% were women, and 51.2% had type 2 diabetes. Use of GLP-1 RAs was associated with higher rates of RGC (OR 4.82, 95%CI 3.66-6.35) and procedure discontinuation (OR 3.93, 95%CI 2.42-6.39) compared with control treatment. In contrast, the incidence of aspiration events was similar between groups (OR 1.1, 95%CI 0.84-1.48). Results remained consistent in a sensitivity analysis based on propensity score matching to control for confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1 RA therapy is associated with a greater incidence of RGC and higher rates of endoscopy termination, but not with a higher risk of aspiration. Adjusting the fasting duration, rather than routinely discontinuing GLP-1 RAs, may represent a reasonable management approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"39 4","pages":"452-463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13352199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2026.1067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) delay gastric emptying, raising concerns about potential aspiration risk during upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of GLP-1 RA therapy on procedural outcomes in patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy.

Methods: We searched Medline and Cochrane library up to July 2025 without restrictions. Eligible studies evaluated patients undergoing upper GI endoscopy, comparing those taking GLP-1 RAs with those who were not. Outcomes of interest were the incidence of retained gastric contents (RGC), bronchopulmonary aspiration, and procedure discontinuation. Pooled estimates are expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using a random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting.

Results: Twenty-four observational studies, predominantly retrospective, met the inclusion criteria: these comprised 184,707 participants, of whom 59,095 were taking GLP-1 RAs. Mean age was 58.7 years, 48.8% were women, and 51.2% had type 2 diabetes. Use of GLP-1 RAs was associated with higher rates of RGC (OR 4.82, 95%CI 3.66-6.35) and procedure discontinuation (OR 3.93, 95%CI 2.42-6.39) compared with control treatment. In contrast, the incidence of aspiration events was similar between groups (OR 1.1, 95%CI 0.84-1.48). Results remained consistent in a sensitivity analysis based on propensity score matching to control for confounders.

Conclusions: GLP-1 RA therapy is associated with a greater incidence of RGC and higher rates of endoscopy termination, but not with a higher risk of aspiration. Adjusting the fasting duration, rather than routinely discontinuing GLP-1 RAs, may represent a reasonable management approach.

GLP-1受体激动剂对上消化道内镜结果的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)延迟胃排空,引起对上消化道(GI)内窥镜检查时潜在误吸风险的担忧。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估GLP-1 RA治疗对上消化道内镜患者手术结局的影响。方法:检索截至2025年7月的Medline和Cochrane图书馆。符合条件的研究评估了接受上消化道内镜检查的患者,比较了服用GLP-1 RAs的患者和未服用GLP-1 RAs的患者。关注的结果是胃内容物残留(RGC)的发生率、支气管肺误吸和手术中止。合并估计用95%置信区间(ci)的比值比(ORs)表示,使用随机效应的逆方差加权元分析。结果:24项观察性研究,主要是回顾性研究,符合纳入标准:共有184,707名参与者,其中59,095人服用GLP-1 RAs。平均年龄58.7岁,女性48.8%,51.2%患有2型糖尿病。与对照治疗相比,GLP-1 RAs的使用与更高的RGC发生率(OR 4.82, 95%CI 3.66-6.35)和手术中断率(OR 3.93, 95%CI 2.42-6.39)相关。相反,两组间误吸事件的发生率相似(OR 1.1, 95%CI 0.84-1.48)。在基于倾向评分与混杂因素对照匹配的敏感性分析中,结果保持一致。结论:GLP-1 RA治疗与更高的RGC发生率和更高的内镜终止率相关,但与更高的误吸风险无关。调整禁食时间,而不是常规停用GLP-1 RAs,可能是一种合理的管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书