Local Knowledge of Land Use Effects on Human-Rodent Interfaces in Lassa-Endemic Nigeria.

IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Christina Harden, Sunday Eziechina, Nzube Michael Ifebueme, David Simons, Lina Moses, David W Redding, Sagan Friant
{"title":"Local Knowledge of Land Use Effects on Human-Rodent Interfaces in Lassa-Endemic Nigeria.","authors":"Christina Harden, Sunday Eziechina, Nzube Michael Ifebueme, David Simons, Lina Moses, David W Redding, Sagan Friant","doi":"10.1007/s10393-026-01810-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lassa fever (LF) is endemic to West Africa with a disproportionate impact on rural communities. LF is caused by Mammarenavirus lassaense (LASV), an arenavirus hosted by Mastomys spp. rodents (multimammate rats). This study leverages local knowledge to examine how human settlement patterns and agricultural land use influence perceptions of Mastomys spp. population dynamics and affect human-rodent interactions across diverse social and ecological settings in Lassa-endemic areas of Nigeria. We used participatory rural appraisal (PRA) at three sites with varying settlement patterns and landscape structure to (1) summarize landcover and agricultural practices, (2) characterize human land use within different landcover types, and (3) identify types and frequency of human interactions with suspected Mastomys spp. PRA revealed consistent patterns of (1) perceived Mastomys spp. population ecology and behavior and (2) reported human-Mastomys spp. contact across villages and landcover types. All villages reported perceived increases in Mastomys spp. activity in response to seasonal land clearing and rice harvest. Perceptions of rodent movement varied between settlement types, with increased movement of Mastomys spp. between agricultural fields and residential compounds reported in villages where homes were interspersed with farmland. Regular contact with Mastomys spp. was widely reported in both households and fields, although contact type and frequency differed based on gendered agricultural duties and daily activity, revealing potentially underemphasized pathways for LASV transmission in agricultural settings. PRA data suggests human settlement patterns and agricultural land use mediate LASV reservoir movement and human-reservoir interfaces, potentially creating variation in LF exposure risk both within villages and across the endemic area.</p>","PeriodicalId":51027,"journal":{"name":"Ecohealth","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohealth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-026-01810-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lassa fever (LF) is endemic to West Africa with a disproportionate impact on rural communities. LF is caused by Mammarenavirus lassaense (LASV), an arenavirus hosted by Mastomys spp. rodents (multimammate rats). This study leverages local knowledge to examine how human settlement patterns and agricultural land use influence perceptions of Mastomys spp. population dynamics and affect human-rodent interactions across diverse social and ecological settings in Lassa-endemic areas of Nigeria. We used participatory rural appraisal (PRA) at three sites with varying settlement patterns and landscape structure to (1) summarize landcover and agricultural practices, (2) characterize human land use within different landcover types, and (3) identify types and frequency of human interactions with suspected Mastomys spp. PRA revealed consistent patterns of (1) perceived Mastomys spp. population ecology and behavior and (2) reported human-Mastomys spp. contact across villages and landcover types. All villages reported perceived increases in Mastomys spp. activity in response to seasonal land clearing and rice harvest. Perceptions of rodent movement varied between settlement types, with increased movement of Mastomys spp. between agricultural fields and residential compounds reported in villages where homes were interspersed with farmland. Regular contact with Mastomys spp. was widely reported in both households and fields, although contact type and frequency differed based on gendered agricultural duties and daily activity, revealing potentially underemphasized pathways for LASV transmission in agricultural settings. PRA data suggests human settlement patterns and agricultural land use mediate LASV reservoir movement and human-reservoir interfaces, potentially creating variation in LF exposure risk both within villages and across the endemic area.

尼日利亚拉沙病流行地区土地利用对人鼠界面影响的当地知识。
拉沙热是西非的一种地方病,对农村社区的影响尤为严重。LF是由乳腺沙粒病毒lassense (LASV)引起的,这是一种由Mastomys spp.啮齿动物(多雌性大鼠)携带的沙粒病毒。本研究利用当地知识,考察了人类住区模式和农业土地利用如何影响尼日利亚拉沙病流行地区不同社会和生态环境中对Mastomys种群动态的看法,以及人类与啮齿动物的相互作用。在三个不同聚落模式和景观结构的地点,我们采用参与式农村评估(PRA)来(1)总结土地覆盖和农业实践;(2)在不同的土地覆盖类型中表征人类土地利用。(3)确定人类与疑似Mastomys spp相互作用的类型和频率。PRA揭示了:(1)感知到的Mastomys spp种群生态和行为模式;(2)不同村庄和土地覆盖类型的人类与Mastomys spp接触报告模式的一致性。所有村庄都报告说,由于季节性土地清理和水稻收获,Mastomys的活动有所增加。对啮齿动物活动的感知因聚落类型而异,据报道,在房屋与农田穿插的村庄中,Mastomys在农田和居民区之间的活动增加。尽管接触类型和频率因性别农业职责和日常活动而异,但在家庭和田间均广泛报道了与Mastomys蝇的定期接触,这揭示了LASV在农业环境中可能被忽视的传播途径。PRA数据表明,人类居住模式和农业用地利用调节LASV水库移动和人-水库界面,可能导致村庄内和整个流行地区的LF暴露风险变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohealth
Ecohealth 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: EcoHealth aims to advance research, practice, and knowledge integration at the interface of ecology and health by publishing high quality research and review articles that address and profile new ideas, developments, and programs. The journal’s scope encompasses research that integrates concepts and theory from many fields of scholarship (including ecological, social and health sciences, and the humanities) and draws upon multiple types of knowledge, including those of relevance to practice and policy. Papers address integrated ecology and health challenges arising in public health, human and veterinary medicine, conservation and ecosystem management, rural and urban development and planning, and other fields that address the social-ecological context of health. The journal is a central platform for fulfilling the mission of the EcoHealth Alliance to strive for sustainable health of people, domestic animals, wildlife, and ecosystems by promoting discovery, understanding, and transdisciplinarity. The journal invites substantial contributions in the following areas: One Health and Conservation Medicine o Integrated research on health of humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Research and policy in ecology, public health, and agricultural sustainability o Emerging infectious diseases affecting people, wildlife, domestic animals, and plants o Research and practice linking human and animal health and/or social-ecological systems o Anthropogenic environmental change and drivers of disease emergence in humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Health of humans and animals in relation to terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems Ecosystem Approaches to Health o Systems thinking and social-ecological systems in relation to health o Transdiiplinary approaches to health, ecosystems and society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书