{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the MoCA-TR in adolescence: Evidence from item-level bifactor analysis and GAMLSS-based norms.","authors":"Yiğit Özaydın, Birsen Şentürk Pilan, Fevzi Tuna Ocakoğlu, Sezen Köse, Tezan Bildik","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2026.2697042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Age-sensitive normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in adolescents are lacking. This study established normative reference values and evaluated the psychometric properties of the Turkish MoCA (MoCA-TR) within Kane's Interpretive Use Argument framework. <b>Method:</b> Participants were 400 community-based adolescents aged 11-18 years (<i>M</i> = 14.5, <i>SD</i> = 2.3; 50% female) recruited from a Family Health Center in Western Turkey. Analyses comprised item-level confirmatory factor analysis (26 binary indicators, WLSMV), bifactor variance decomposition, MIMIC measurement invariance, and GAMLSS normative modeling. Convergent validity used the Stroop Color-Word Test and the BRIEF-2. An exploratory known-groups comparison included 22 adolescents with self-reported neurodevelopmental diagnoses. <b>Results:</b> Six-model comparison supported a three-factor structure (Attention/Executive, Memory, and Language/Abstraction) and a bifactor model with an intermediate unidimensional-multidimensional profile (ECV = 0.512; ωh = 0.584; <i>H</i> = 0.765). Composite reliability was satisfactory (ωtotal = 0.876) and test-retest stability was strong (ICC = 0.83, 95% CI [0.75, 0.89]). Convergent validity was supported by correlations with Stroop interference (<i>r</i> = -0.38) and BRIEF-2 Global Executive Composite (<i>r</i> = -0.36). MIMIC analyses flagged educationally sensitive items (serial subtraction, verbal fluency, and abstraction); Delayed Recall items were sociodemographically invariant. GAMLSS-derived centile curves revealed monotonically increasing scores across adolescence (10th percentile: 24-26). <b>Conclusions:</b> The MoCA-TR demonstrates adequate psychometric properties for cognitive screening in Turkish adolescents. Developmentally calibrated normative values reduce misclassification risk from adult cutoffs, and MIMIC findings support the sociodemographic fairness of episodic memory items for equitable screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2026.2697042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Age-sensitive normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in adolescents are lacking. This study established normative reference values and evaluated the psychometric properties of the Turkish MoCA (MoCA-TR) within Kane's Interpretive Use Argument framework. Method: Participants were 400 community-based adolescents aged 11-18 years (M = 14.5, SD = 2.3; 50% female) recruited from a Family Health Center in Western Turkey. Analyses comprised item-level confirmatory factor analysis (26 binary indicators, WLSMV), bifactor variance decomposition, MIMIC measurement invariance, and GAMLSS normative modeling. Convergent validity used the Stroop Color-Word Test and the BRIEF-2. An exploratory known-groups comparison included 22 adolescents with self-reported neurodevelopmental diagnoses. Results: Six-model comparison supported a three-factor structure (Attention/Executive, Memory, and Language/Abstraction) and a bifactor model with an intermediate unidimensional-multidimensional profile (ECV = 0.512; ωh = 0.584; H = 0.765). Composite reliability was satisfactory (ωtotal = 0.876) and test-retest stability was strong (ICC = 0.83, 95% CI [0.75, 0.89]). Convergent validity was supported by correlations with Stroop interference (r = -0.38) and BRIEF-2 Global Executive Composite (r = -0.36). MIMIC analyses flagged educationally sensitive items (serial subtraction, verbal fluency, and abstraction); Delayed Recall items were sociodemographically invariant. GAMLSS-derived centile curves revealed monotonically increasing scores across adolescence (10th percentile: 24-26). Conclusions: The MoCA-TR demonstrates adequate psychometric properties for cognitive screening in Turkish adolescents. Developmentally calibrated normative values reduce misclassification risk from adult cutoffs, and MIMIC findings support the sociodemographic fairness of episodic memory items for equitable screening.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.