Psychometric evaluation of the MoCA-TR in adolescence: Evidence from item-level bifactor analysis and GAMLSS-based norms.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yiğit Özaydın, Birsen Şentürk Pilan, Fevzi Tuna Ocakoğlu, Sezen Köse, Tezan Bildik
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the MoCA-TR in adolescence: Evidence from item-level bifactor analysis and GAMLSS-based norms.","authors":"Yiğit Özaydın, Birsen Şentürk Pilan, Fevzi Tuna Ocakoğlu, Sezen Köse, Tezan Bildik","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2026.2697042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Age-sensitive normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in adolescents are lacking. This study established normative reference values and evaluated the psychometric properties of the Turkish MoCA (MoCA-TR) within Kane's Interpretive Use Argument framework. <b>Method:</b> Participants were 400 community-based adolescents aged 11-18 years (<i>M</i> = 14.5, <i>SD</i> = 2.3; 50% female) recruited from a Family Health Center in Western Turkey. Analyses comprised item-level confirmatory factor analysis (26 binary indicators, WLSMV), bifactor variance decomposition, MIMIC measurement invariance, and GAMLSS normative modeling. Convergent validity used the Stroop Color-Word Test and the BRIEF-2. An exploratory known-groups comparison included 22 adolescents with self-reported neurodevelopmental diagnoses. <b>Results:</b> Six-model comparison supported a three-factor structure (Attention/Executive, Memory, and Language/Abstraction) and a bifactor model with an intermediate unidimensional-multidimensional profile (ECV = 0.512; ωh = 0.584; <i>H</i> = 0.765). Composite reliability was satisfactory (ωtotal = 0.876) and test-retest stability was strong (ICC = 0.83, 95% CI [0.75, 0.89]). Convergent validity was supported by correlations with Stroop interference (<i>r</i> = -0.38) and BRIEF-2 Global Executive Composite (<i>r</i> = -0.36). MIMIC analyses flagged educationally sensitive items (serial subtraction, verbal fluency, and abstraction); Delayed Recall items were sociodemographically invariant. GAMLSS-derived centile curves revealed monotonically increasing scores across adolescence (10th percentile: 24-26). <b>Conclusions:</b> The MoCA-TR demonstrates adequate psychometric properties for cognitive screening in Turkish adolescents. Developmentally calibrated normative values reduce misclassification risk from adult cutoffs, and MIMIC findings support the sociodemographic fairness of episodic memory items for equitable screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2026.2697042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Age-sensitive normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in adolescents are lacking. This study established normative reference values and evaluated the psychometric properties of the Turkish MoCA (MoCA-TR) within Kane's Interpretive Use Argument framework. Method: Participants were 400 community-based adolescents aged 11-18 years (M = 14.5, SD = 2.3; 50% female) recruited from a Family Health Center in Western Turkey. Analyses comprised item-level confirmatory factor analysis (26 binary indicators, WLSMV), bifactor variance decomposition, MIMIC measurement invariance, and GAMLSS normative modeling. Convergent validity used the Stroop Color-Word Test and the BRIEF-2. An exploratory known-groups comparison included 22 adolescents with self-reported neurodevelopmental diagnoses. Results: Six-model comparison supported a three-factor structure (Attention/Executive, Memory, and Language/Abstraction) and a bifactor model with an intermediate unidimensional-multidimensional profile (ECV = 0.512; ωh = 0.584; H = 0.765). Composite reliability was satisfactory (ωtotal = 0.876) and test-retest stability was strong (ICC = 0.83, 95% CI [0.75, 0.89]). Convergent validity was supported by correlations with Stroop interference (r = -0.38) and BRIEF-2 Global Executive Composite (r = -0.36). MIMIC analyses flagged educationally sensitive items (serial subtraction, verbal fluency, and abstraction); Delayed Recall items were sociodemographically invariant. GAMLSS-derived centile curves revealed monotonically increasing scores across adolescence (10th percentile: 24-26). Conclusions: The MoCA-TR demonstrates adequate psychometric properties for cognitive screening in Turkish adolescents. Developmentally calibrated normative values reduce misclassification risk from adult cutoffs, and MIMIC findings support the sociodemographic fairness of episodic memory items for equitable screening.

青少年MoCA-TR的心理测量评估:来自项目水平双因素分析和基于gamlss的规范的证据。
目的:缺乏青少年蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)年龄敏感的规范性数据。本研究建立了规范性参考值,并在Kane的解释使用论证框架内评估了土耳其MoCA (MoCA- tr)的心理测量特性。方法:参与者是从土耳其西部一家家庭健康中心招募的400名11-18岁社区青少年(M = 14.5, SD = 2.3; 50%为女性)。分析包括项目水平的验证性因子分析(26个二元指标,WLSMV),双因素方差分解,MIMIC测量不变性和GAMLSS规范建模。收敛效度采用Stroop色字测验和BRIEF-2。一项探索性的已知组比较包括22名自我报告神经发育诊断的青少年。结果:六模型比较支持三因素模型(注意/执行、记忆和语言/抽象)和双因素模型(ECV = 0.512, ωh = 0.584, H = 0.765)。复合信度满意(ωtotal = 0.876),重测稳定性强(ICC = 0.83, 95% CI[0.75, 0.89])。与Stroop干扰(r = -0.38)和BRIEF-2全球执行综合(r = -0.36)的相关性支持收敛效度。MIMIC分析标记教育敏感项目(连续减法,语言流畅性和抽象);延迟回忆项目在社会人口学上是不变的。gamlss导出的百分位曲线显示整个青少年的分数单调增加(第10百分位:24-26)。结论:MoCA-TR在土耳其青少年的认知筛查中显示了足够的心理测量特性。发展校准的标准值减少了成人临界值的错误分类风险,MIMIC研究结果支持情景记忆项目公平筛选的社会人口学公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书