Low-dose epidural anesthesia for autonomic dysreflexia prevention in individuals with high-risk cervical spinal cord injury undergoing transurethral procedures: A retrospective case series.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Wei Xiong, Hui-Ling Cong, Qiang Wang, Lei Wan
{"title":"Low-dose epidural anesthesia for autonomic dysreflexia prevention in individuals with high-risk cervical spinal cord injury undergoing transurethral procedures: A retrospective case series.","authors":"Wei Xiong, Hui-Ling Cong, Qiang Wang, Lei Wan","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2026.2687277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Autonomic dysreflexia (AD) is a life-threatening condition frequently triggered during transurethral procedures in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). General anesthesia (GA) does not consistently prevent AD in this population, and optimal anesthetic management remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We report five male individuals with C4-C6 SCI, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A/B with documented AD during daily catheterization who underwent transurethral procedures under low-dose epidural anesthesia (EA). Lumbar EA was performed with ropivacaine 0.2%-0.5% (4-10 mL). Sensory level testing was not possible; blockade adequacy was inferred from spasticity control and hemodynamic stability. No individual developed intraoperative AD, defined as an acute increase in systolic blood pressure (BP) of >20 mmHg above baseline in response to surgical stimuli. All procedures (four bladder lithotripsies, one bladder neck incision) were completed uneventfully. Systolic BP remained within 20 mmHg of baseline in four individuals; one individual with preoperative anxiety showed BP reduction to stable levels. No clinically significant hypotension or tachycardia occurred. One individual received atropine for transient bradycardia, which resolved promptly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/clinical relevance: </strong>Low-dose EA was associated with an absence of intraoperative AD in five individuals with high-risk cervical spinal cord injury, with stable hemodynamics and effective spasticity control. No adverse hemodynamic instability was observed, in contrast to our previous experience with GA. While preliminary, these findings suggest EA warrants further investigation as a prophylactic strategy for AD in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2026.2687277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Autonomic dysreflexia (AD) is a life-threatening condition frequently triggered during transurethral procedures in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). General anesthesia (GA) does not consistently prevent AD in this population, and optimal anesthetic management remains uncertain.

Findings: We report five male individuals with C4-C6 SCI, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A/B with documented AD during daily catheterization who underwent transurethral procedures under low-dose epidural anesthesia (EA). Lumbar EA was performed with ropivacaine 0.2%-0.5% (4-10 mL). Sensory level testing was not possible; blockade adequacy was inferred from spasticity control and hemodynamic stability. No individual developed intraoperative AD, defined as an acute increase in systolic blood pressure (BP) of >20 mmHg above baseline in response to surgical stimuli. All procedures (four bladder lithotripsies, one bladder neck incision) were completed uneventfully. Systolic BP remained within 20 mmHg of baseline in four individuals; one individual with preoperative anxiety showed BP reduction to stable levels. No clinically significant hypotension or tachycardia occurred. One individual received atropine for transient bradycardia, which resolved promptly.

Conclusion/clinical relevance: Low-dose EA was associated with an absence of intraoperative AD in five individuals with high-risk cervical spinal cord injury, with stable hemodynamics and effective spasticity control. No adverse hemodynamic instability was observed, in contrast to our previous experience with GA. While preliminary, these findings suggest EA warrants further investigation as a prophylactic strategy for AD in this population.

低剂量硬膜外麻醉预防经尿道高危颈脊髓损伤患者自主神经反射障碍:回顾性病例系列。
背景:自主神经反射障碍(AD)是一种危及生命的疾病,经常在颈脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的经尿道手术中触发。在这一人群中,全身麻醉(GA)并不能始终如一地预防AD,最佳麻醉管理仍不确定。研究结果:我们报告了5例C4-C6型脊髓损伤男性患者,美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表(AIS)分级为A/B,在每日导尿过程中记录AD,他们在低剂量硬膜外麻醉(EA)下接受经尿道手术。腰EA采用罗哌卡因0.2% ~ 0.5% (4 ~ 10 mL)。感官水平测试是不可能的;从痉挛控制和血流动力学稳定性推断阻滞是否充足。术中AD的定义是由于手术刺激导致收缩压(BP)比基线急性升高约20 mmHg。所有手术(4例膀胱碎石,1例膀胱颈部切口)均顺利完成。4人收缩压保持在基线的20mmhg以内;1例术前焦虑患者血压降至稳定水平。未发生明显的低血压或心动过速。一名患者接受阿托品治疗短暂性心动过缓,症状迅速缓解。结论/临床意义:低剂量EA与5例高危颈脊髓损伤患者术中无AD相关,血流动力学稳定,痉挛控制有效。没有观察到不良的血流动力学不稳定,与我们之前的GA经验相反。虽然是初步的,但这些发现表明EA作为一种预防该人群AD的策略值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书