A quality improvement project assessing veteran outpatient and provider attitudes about telemental health two years into the pandemic.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Elizabeth M Goetter, Megan E Parmenter, Kyle A Faust, Daniel Epstein, Kaloyan S Tanev
{"title":"A quality improvement project assessing veteran outpatient and provider attitudes about telemental health two years into the pandemic.","authors":"Elizabeth M Goetter, Megan E Parmenter, Kyle A Faust, Daniel Epstein, Kaloyan S Tanev","doi":"10.1037/ser0001061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This project was an evaluation of visit data and patient and provider attitudes about telemental health in an outpatient mental health clinic for military veterans 2 years into the COVID-19 pandemic. As part of a quality improvement initiative over a 2-week period that occurred 2 years after the clinic converted all operations to virtual format, 168 unique individuals (across 149 eligible telehealth appointments) and 23 mental health treatment providers who were part of a multidisciplinary team were eligible to complete an anonymous self-report satisfaction survey immediately after a telehealth session. Compared with the 8-week period pre-COVID-19 closure, during the current 2-week quality improvement period, the majority of mental health visits (99% vs. 1% preclosure) were being conducted via telehealth with a similar no-show rate for individual treatment sessions (12% vs. 15% preclosure). Over half of patients expressed preference for continued telehealth visits, while another third expressed preference for a combination of in-person and telehealth appointments. Ninety-five percent of clients and 100% of clinicians reported that they were \"quite a bit\" or \"extremely\" satisfied with telehealth in terms of addressing the client's questions and concerns, suggesting high rates of satisfaction. Compared with the initial quality improvement period in the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a shift in attitudes with fewer people expressing interest in returning to in-person treatment and more patients requesting telehealth appointments for future. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0001061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This project was an evaluation of visit data and patient and provider attitudes about telemental health in an outpatient mental health clinic for military veterans 2 years into the COVID-19 pandemic. As part of a quality improvement initiative over a 2-week period that occurred 2 years after the clinic converted all operations to virtual format, 168 unique individuals (across 149 eligible telehealth appointments) and 23 mental health treatment providers who were part of a multidisciplinary team were eligible to complete an anonymous self-report satisfaction survey immediately after a telehealth session. Compared with the 8-week period pre-COVID-19 closure, during the current 2-week quality improvement period, the majority of mental health visits (99% vs. 1% preclosure) were being conducted via telehealth with a similar no-show rate for individual treatment sessions (12% vs. 15% preclosure). Over half of patients expressed preference for continued telehealth visits, while another third expressed preference for a combination of in-person and telehealth appointments. Ninety-five percent of clients and 100% of clinicians reported that they were "quite a bit" or "extremely" satisfied with telehealth in terms of addressing the client's questions and concerns, suggesting high rates of satisfaction. Compared with the initial quality improvement period in the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a shift in attitudes with fewer people expressing interest in returning to in-person treatment and more patients requesting telehealth appointments for future. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

一个质量改进项目,评估退伍军人门诊和提供者对远程心理健康的态度。
该项目是在2019冠状病毒病大流行2年后,对退伍军人门诊心理健康诊所的就诊数据以及患者和提供者对远程心理健康的态度进行评估。在诊所将所有业务转换为虚拟格式两年后,作为为期两周的质量改进倡议的一部分,168个独特的个人(跨越149个合格的远程医疗预约)和23个多学科团队的精神健康治疗提供者有资格在远程医疗会议结束后立即完成匿名自我报告满意度调查。与covid -19关闭前的8周期间相比,在目前的2周质量改善期间,大多数心理健康就诊(99% vs.关闭前的1%)是通过远程医疗进行的,个别治疗的缺席率相似(12% vs.关闭前的15%)。超过一半的患者表示更愿意继续进行远程医疗访问,而另外三分之一的患者表示更愿意将面对面和远程医疗预约结合起来。95%的客户和100%的临床医生报告说,在解决客户的问题和关切方面,他们对远程医疗“相当”或“非常”满意,这表明满意度很高。与COVID-19大流行急性期的最初质量改善期相比,人们的态度发生了转变,越来越少的人表示有兴趣回到现场治疗,越来越多的患者要求将来进行远程医疗预约。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书