The association between atherogenic index of plasma and postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery patients: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Xiaqing Zhang, Mingliang Xing, Afen Zhang, Rongzhi Zheng, Huiru Hu, Xianming Zeng
{"title":"The association between atherogenic index of plasma and postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery patients: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.","authors":"Xiaqing Zhang, Mingliang Xing, Afen Zhang, Rongzhi Zheng, Huiru Hu, Xianming Zeng","doi":"10.1186/s13741-026-00717-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and the risk of postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the MIMIC-IV 2.2 with patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used in a 1:1 ratio to balance baseline characteristics (age, sex, race) between delirium and non-delirium groups. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to assess the independent association between AIP (analyzed as both a continuous and categorical variable in quartiles) and POD, with adjustments for demographics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, vital signs, medication use, and surgical details. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) were used to explore nonlinearity. Subgroup and mediation analyses were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 6,067 eligible patients, 1,565 (25.8%) developed POD. After PSM, 3,130 patients were analyzed. Multivariable regression revealed a significant positive association between AIP and POD (OR: 1.622, 95% CI: 1.455-1.81, P < 0.001). Quartile stratification revealed that higher AIP levels were associated with an increased risk of POD (OR: 1.708, 95% CI: 1.399-2.088, P < 0.001). In the fully adjusted model (Model 3), AIP remained significantly associated with POD (OR: 1.435, 95% CI: 1.249-1.652, P < 0.001). RCS analysis revealed a significant nonlinear relationship between AIP and POD (P < 0.001), consistent across gender subgroups. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant interactions. Mediation analysis indicated that hemoglobin (Hb), red cell distribution width (RDW), albumin (Alb), and respiratory rate (RR) partially mediated the association between AIP and POD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AIP was independently and nonlinearly associated with an increased risk of POD following cardiac surgery. As an easily calculable composite lipid indicator, AIP may serve as a potential biomarker for preoperative risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13632281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-026-00717-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and the risk of postoperative delirium (POD) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the MIMIC-IV 2.2 with patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used in a 1:1 ratio to balance baseline characteristics (age, sex, race) between delirium and non-delirium groups. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to assess the independent association between AIP (analyzed as both a continuous and categorical variable in quartiles) and POD, with adjustments for demographics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, vital signs, medication use, and surgical details. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) were used to explore nonlinearity. Subgroup and mediation analyses were also performed.

Results: Among 6,067 eligible patients, 1,565 (25.8%) developed POD. After PSM, 3,130 patients were analyzed. Multivariable regression revealed a significant positive association between AIP and POD (OR: 1.622, 95% CI: 1.455-1.81, P < 0.001). Quartile stratification revealed that higher AIP levels were associated with an increased risk of POD (OR: 1.708, 95% CI: 1.399-2.088, P < 0.001). In the fully adjusted model (Model 3), AIP remained significantly associated with POD (OR: 1.435, 95% CI: 1.249-1.652, P < 0.001). RCS analysis revealed a significant nonlinear relationship between AIP and POD (P < 0.001), consistent across gender subgroups. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant interactions. Mediation analysis indicated that hemoglobin (Hb), red cell distribution width (RDW), albumin (Alb), and respiratory rate (RR) partially mediated the association between AIP and POD.

Conclusion: AIP was independently and nonlinearly associated with an increased risk of POD following cardiac surgery. As an easily calculable composite lipid indicator, AIP may serve as a potential biomarker for preoperative risk stratification.

心脏手术患者血浆粥样硬化指数与术后谵妄之间的关系:对MIMIC-IV数据库的分析
背景:本研究旨在探讨心脏手术患者血浆粥样硬化指数(AIP)与术后谵妄(POD)风险的关系。方法:采用MIMIC-IV 2.2的数据,对接受心脏手术的患者进行回顾性队列研究。倾向评分匹配(PSM)以1:1的比例用于平衡谵妄和非谵妄组之间的基线特征(年龄,性别,种族)。采用多变量logistic回归模型评估AIP(以四分位数作为连续变量和分类变量进行分析)与POD之间的独立关联,并对人口统计学、合并症、实验室参数、生命体征、药物使用和手术细节进行调整。限制三次样条(RCS)用于非线性分析。还进行了亚组分析和中介分析。结果:在6067例符合条件的患者中,1565例(25.8%)发生POD。PSM后,对3130例患者进行了分析。多变量回归显示AIP与POD显著正相关(OR: 1.622, 95% CI: 1.455-1.81, P)结论:AIP与心脏手术后POD风险增加独立且非线性相关。AIP是一种易于计算的复合脂质指标,可作为术前风险分层的潜在生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书