Outcomes of Tranexamic Acid Treatment in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Overview of Reviews.

IF 0.6 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Acta medica Indonesiana Pub Date : 2026-04-01
Aurel Feodora Tantoro, Rehulina Br Tarigan, Kaima Ishmata Rianti, Suwito Indra
{"title":"Outcomes of Tranexamic Acid Treatment in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Overview of Reviews.","authors":"Aurel Feodora Tantoro, Rehulina Br Tarigan, Kaima Ishmata Rianti, Suwito Indra","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a life-threatening emergency requiring prompt management. Standard treatments include endoscopic intervention, blood transfusions, and pharmacological therapies such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and antifibrinolytics like tranexamic acid (TXA). However, the efficacy of TXA in UGIB remains controversial due to mixed findings. This systematic review analyzed six systematic reviews covering 34,351 patients. The objective is to assess TXA's effectiveness in reducing mortality, rebleeding, and thromboembolic events, as well as secondary outcomes such as transfusion requirements, surgery, hospital stay, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies on non-GI bleeding, pediatric populations, and non-peer-reviewed articles were excluded. A comprehensive search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and DOAJ (2014-2024) identified 157 records, with six systematic reviews/meta-analyses (34,351 participants) meeting inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR 2, with two studies rated as high confidence and four as moderate confidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Current high-quality evidence does not support routine TXA use for mortality reduction in UGIB. Safety remains uncertain, particularly with prolonged high-dose administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings are consistent with the 2022 Indonesian national consensus, which advises against routine TXA use in UGIB. Future research should focus on optimized dosing strategies, timing of administration, and identification of clinically relevant subgroups to clarify its therapeutic role.</p>","PeriodicalId":6889,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Indonesiana","volume":"58 2","pages":"138-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a life-threatening emergency requiring prompt management. Standard treatments include endoscopic intervention, blood transfusions, and pharmacological therapies such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and antifibrinolytics like tranexamic acid (TXA). However, the efficacy of TXA in UGIB remains controversial due to mixed findings. This systematic review analyzed six systematic reviews covering 34,351 patients. The objective is to assess TXA's effectiveness in reducing mortality, rebleeding, and thromboembolic events, as well as secondary outcomes such as transfusion requirements, surgery, hospital stay, and adverse events.

Methods: Studies on non-GI bleeding, pediatric populations, and non-peer-reviewed articles were excluded. A comprehensive search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and DOAJ (2014-2024) identified 157 records, with six systematic reviews/meta-analyses (34,351 participants) meeting inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR 2, with two studies rated as high confidence and four as moderate confidence.

Results: Current high-quality evidence does not support routine TXA use for mortality reduction in UGIB. Safety remains uncertain, particularly with prolonged high-dose administration.

Conclusion: These findings are consistent with the 2022 Indonesian national consensus, which advises against routine TXA use in UGIB. Future research should focus on optimized dosing strategies, timing of administration, and identification of clinically relevant subgroups to clarify its therapeutic role.

氨甲环酸治疗上消化道出血患者的疗效:综述。
背景:上消化道出血(UGIB)是危及生命的急症,需要及时处理。标准治疗包括内镜干预、输血和药物治疗,如质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)和抗纤溶剂,如氨甲环酸(TXA)。然而,由于研究结果不一,TXA在UGIB中的疗效仍然存在争议。本系统综述分析了6项系统综述,涵盖34,351例患者。目的是评估TXA在降低死亡率、再出血、血栓栓塞事件以及次要结局(如输血要求、手术、住院时间和不良事件)方面的有效性。方法:排除非消化道出血、儿科人群和非同行评议文章的研究。通过PubMed、Cochrane Library、ScienceDirect和DOAJ(2014-2024)的综合检索,确定了157条记录,6项系统评价/荟萃分析(34,351名参与者)符合纳入标准。使用AMSTAR 2评估偏倚风险,其中两项研究被评为高可信度,四项研究被评为中等可信度。结果:目前的高质量证据不支持常规使用TXA降低UGIB的死亡率。安全性仍不确定,特别是长期高剂量给药。结论:这些发现与2022年印度尼西亚国家共识一致,该共识建议在UGIB中不要常规使用TXA。未来的研究应侧重于优化给药策略、给药时间和确定临床相关亚组,以明确其治疗作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta medica Indonesiana
Acta medica Indonesiana MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Indonesiana – The Indonesian Journal of Internal Medicine is an open accessed online journal and comprehensive peer-reviewed medical journal published by the Indonesian Society of Internal Medicine since 1968. Our main mission is to encourage the novel and important science in the clinical area in internal medicine. We welcome authors for original articles (research), review articles, interesting case reports, special articles, clinical practices, and medical illustrations that focus on the clinical area of internal medicine. Subjects suitable for publication include, but are not limited to the following fields of: -Allergy and immunology -Emergency medicine -Cancer and stem cells -Cardiovascular -Endocrinology and Metabolism -Gastroenterology -Gerontology -Hematology -Hepatology -Tropical and Infectious Disease -Virology -Internal medicine -Psychosomatic -Pulmonology -Rheumatology -Renal and Hypertension -Thyroid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书