Pirinka Georgiev Tuttle, Tiffany Hidalgo, Catherine Soderstrom, F Isik Karahanoglu, Christian Russel Reyes, Yalei Chen, Carolina Owen, Mar Santamaria, Denise E Chou, Bunmi Williams, Anna Gao, Jessica Selig, Briana Peterson, Bhavna Adhin, Xuemei Cai
{"title":"Limited agreement of cytokines and CRP through patient-centric microsampling compared to venipuncture in healthy adults.","authors":"Pirinka Georgiev Tuttle, Tiffany Hidalgo, Catherine Soderstrom, F Isik Karahanoglu, Christian Russel Reyes, Yalei Chen, Carolina Owen, Mar Santamaria, Denise E Chou, Bunmi Williams, Anna Gao, Jessica Selig, Briana Peterson, Bhavna Adhin, Xuemei Cai","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2026.2698413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This low-interventional study assessed the agreement of the paper DBS and Tasso-M20, two dried blood patient-centric sampling (PCS) devices used to measure C-reactive protein (CRP) and cytokine levels (TNF-α, IL-8, IL-10, IL-2, IL-6, and IFN-γ) and compared the results to venous plasma samples in the general adult population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Levels of cytokines and CRP were measured with an assay for venous plasma, adapted for use with dried blood from PCS. Study participants also provided their preferences for blood sampling through a device usability questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlations were observed for some of the selected cytokines measured with dried blood PCS devices compared to venous plasma. However, results were not always consistently and reliably measured. A subset of the cytokines could also not be detected in venous plasma. Overall, participants reported a preference for using PCS devices over venipuncture, on their own at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCS shows promise for a better patient experience; however, our results highlight that further study of cytokines and CRP using PCS is needed before it can be used in place of venipuncture. Future studies should consider measurement of analytes in specific patient populations, whole blood matrix PCS, and potentially more sensitive assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"691-700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13557554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2026.2698413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: This low-interventional study assessed the agreement of the paper DBS and Tasso-M20, two dried blood patient-centric sampling (PCS) devices used to measure C-reactive protein (CRP) and cytokine levels (TNF-α, IL-8, IL-10, IL-2, IL-6, and IFN-γ) and compared the results to venous plasma samples in the general adult population.
Materials and methods: Levels of cytokines and CRP were measured with an assay for venous plasma, adapted for use with dried blood from PCS. Study participants also provided their preferences for blood sampling through a device usability questionnaire.
Results: Correlations were observed for some of the selected cytokines measured with dried blood PCS devices compared to venous plasma. However, results were not always consistently and reliably measured. A subset of the cytokines could also not be detected in venous plasma. Overall, participants reported a preference for using PCS devices over venipuncture, on their own at home.
Conclusion: PCS shows promise for a better patient experience; however, our results highlight that further study of cytokines and CRP using PCS is needed before it can be used in place of venipuncture. Future studies should consider measurement of analytes in specific patient populations, whole blood matrix PCS, and potentially more sensitive assays.
BioanalysisBIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍:
Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing.
The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality.
Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing.
The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques.
Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.