Deep Learning Outperforms Descriptor-Based Classification of Food Items Using Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Data

IF 1.8 3区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Mahmoud Elsayed, Islam H. El Azab, Hassan E. Abd Elsalam, Hussein A. K. Kyhoiesh
{"title":"Deep Learning Outperforms Descriptor-Based Classification of Food Items Using Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Data","authors":"Mahmoud Elsayed,&nbsp;Islam H. El Azab,&nbsp;Hassan E. Abd Elsalam,&nbsp;Hussein A. K. Kyhoiesh","doi":"10.1002/rcm.70134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Food classification and adulteration detection are challenged by the complexity of chemical matrices. Traditional descriptor-based methods fail to capture interactions in chromatography–mass spectrometry (CMS) data. This study compares a convolutional neural network (CNN) against a random forest (RF) baseline using engineered descriptors to classify 15 food items to demonstrate deep learning advantage for objective, scalable food authentication.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Three thousand CMS spectra is computationally simulated (200 per class) based on FooDB compound profiles. Six engineered descriptors (mean intensity, standard deviation, spectral entropy, etc.) are extracted for RF training. A SimpleCNN with two convolutional layers (32/64 filters, kernel size 5) followed by max-pooling, a fully connected layer (128 units, dropout 0.3), and softmax output is trained (Adam, lr = 0.001, 50 epochs). t-SNE and K-means (<i>k</i> = 5) visualize the chemical space, while adulteration are simulated by mixing corn syrup into honey spectra (10%–50% v/v).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The CNN achieves 93.1% accuracy, significantly outperforming RF (87.3%). t-SNE reveales five coherent clusters (silhouette coefficient = 0.71; Davies–Bouldin index = 0.43). Adulteration detection reaches 94.2% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity. The chemical similarity network identified novel pairings (e.g., chocolate–coffee, cosine similarity = 0.804) consistent with shared Maillard reaction products.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>End-to-end deep learning on CMS fingerprints substantially surpasses descriptor-based classification to provide a robust pipeline for food authentication, adulteration screening, and data-driven pairing discovery. Validation on experimentally acquired spectra remains a necessary next step.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":225,"journal":{"name":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","volume":"40 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcm.70134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

Food classification and adulteration detection are challenged by the complexity of chemical matrices. Traditional descriptor-based methods fail to capture interactions in chromatography–mass spectrometry (CMS) data. This study compares a convolutional neural network (CNN) against a random forest (RF) baseline using engineered descriptors to classify 15 food items to demonstrate deep learning advantage for objective, scalable food authentication.

Methods

Three thousand CMS spectra is computationally simulated (200 per class) based on FooDB compound profiles. Six engineered descriptors (mean intensity, standard deviation, spectral entropy, etc.) are extracted for RF training. A SimpleCNN with two convolutional layers (32/64 filters, kernel size 5) followed by max-pooling, a fully connected layer (128 units, dropout 0.3), and softmax output is trained (Adam, lr = 0.001, 50 epochs). t-SNE and K-means (k = 5) visualize the chemical space, while adulteration are simulated by mixing corn syrup into honey spectra (10%–50% v/v).

Results

The CNN achieves 93.1% accuracy, significantly outperforming RF (87.3%). t-SNE reveales five coherent clusters (silhouette coefficient = 0.71; Davies–Bouldin index = 0.43). Adulteration detection reaches 94.2% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity. The chemical similarity network identified novel pairings (e.g., chocolate–coffee, cosine similarity = 0.804) consistent with shared Maillard reaction products.

Conclusion

End-to-end deep learning on CMS fingerprints substantially surpasses descriptor-based classification to provide a robust pipeline for food authentication, adulteration screening, and data-driven pairing discovery. Validation on experimentally acquired spectra remains a necessary next step.

使用色谱-质谱数据,深度学习优于基于描述符的食品分类。
理由:食品分类和掺假检测受到化学基质复杂性的挑战。传统的基于描述符的方法无法捕获色谱-质谱(CMS)数据中的相互作用。本研究将卷积神经网络(CNN)与随机森林(RF)基线进行比较,使用工程描述符对15种食品进行分类,以展示深度学习在客观、可扩展的食品认证方面的优势。方法:以FooDB化合物剖面为基础,计算模拟3000个CMS光谱(每类200个)。六个工程描述符(平均强度,标准差,谱熵等)被提取用于射频训练。SimpleCNN具有两个卷积层(32/64过滤器,内核大小为5),然后是max-pooling,一个完全连接层(128个单元,dropout 0.3)和softmax输出(Adam, lr = 0.001, 50 epoch)。t-SNE和k -means (k = 5)可视化化学空间,而通过将玉米糖浆混入蜂蜜光谱(10%-50% v/v)来模拟掺假。结果:CNN准确率达到93.1%,显著优于RF(87.3%)。t-SNE显示5个相干簇(廓形系数= 0.71;Davies-Bouldin指数= 0.43)。掺假检测灵敏度94.2%,特异度96.8%。化学相似性网络确定了与美拉德反应产物一致的新配对(例如,巧克力-咖啡,余弦相似性= 0.804)。结论:端到端CMS指纹的深度学习大大超过了基于描述符的分类,为食品认证、掺假筛选和数据驱动的配对发现提供了强大的管道。下一步必须对实验获得的光谱进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
219
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry is a journal whose aim is the rapid publication of original research results and ideas on all aspects of the science of gas-phase ions; it covers all the associated scientific disciplines. There is no formal limit on paper length ("rapid" is not synonymous with "brief"), but papers should be of a length that is commensurate with the importance and complexity of the results being reported. Contributions may be theoretical or practical in nature; they may deal with methods, techniques and applications, or with the interpretation of results; they may cover any area in science that depends directly on measurements made upon gaseous ions or that is associated with such measurements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书