Microfluidic Gut-on-a-Chip Models for Functional Food Evaluation: From Digestion Kinetics to Personalized Nutrition.

IF 15.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Feng Yao, Lichun Chen
{"title":"Microfluidic Gut-on-a-Chip Models for Functional Food Evaluation: From Digestion Kinetics to Personalized Nutrition.","authors":"Feng Yao, Lichun Chen","doi":"10.1111/1541-4337.70549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accurate assessment of the gastrointestinal fate of functional food ingredients is critical for substantiating health benefits. However, conventional in vitro models do not fully capture the dynamic, multicellular, and physicochemical environment of the human intestine, creating a predictive gap. Microfluidic gut-on-a-chip (GOC) technology provides a microphysiological approach by integrating fluid flow, mechanical cues, and multicellular co-cultures into a controllable biomimetic platform. This review critically examines the potential applications of GOC systems in evaluating food bioactives. We first summarize core design principles, including biomimetic architecture, material selection, mechanical stimulation, shear stress, and oxygen or chemical gradient control. We then discuss their applications in sequential digestion, intestinal absorption, barrier assessment, host-microbiota interactions, disease-specific modeling, and personalized nutrition. We provide a balanced analysis of the advantages and limitations of GOC systems, with emphasis on physiological relevance in selected contexts, real-time monitoring, material-related analytical bias, biological variability, throughput, standardization, regulatory acceptance, and industrial scalability. Finally, we discuss three application-oriented pathways for food-industry translation: high-throughput screening platforms, personalized formulation testing, and multi-organ microphysiological systems for systemic efficacy and safety assessment. As the field matures, GOC technology may serve as a supportive tool for evidence-based functional food development by bridging conventional in vitro assays and human intervention studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":155,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","volume":"25 4","pages":"e70549"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.70549","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accurate assessment of the gastrointestinal fate of functional food ingredients is critical for substantiating health benefits. However, conventional in vitro models do not fully capture the dynamic, multicellular, and physicochemical environment of the human intestine, creating a predictive gap. Microfluidic gut-on-a-chip (GOC) technology provides a microphysiological approach by integrating fluid flow, mechanical cues, and multicellular co-cultures into a controllable biomimetic platform. This review critically examines the potential applications of GOC systems in evaluating food bioactives. We first summarize core design principles, including biomimetic architecture, material selection, mechanical stimulation, shear stress, and oxygen or chemical gradient control. We then discuss their applications in sequential digestion, intestinal absorption, barrier assessment, host-microbiota interactions, disease-specific modeling, and personalized nutrition. We provide a balanced analysis of the advantages and limitations of GOC systems, with emphasis on physiological relevance in selected contexts, real-time monitoring, material-related analytical bias, biological variability, throughput, standardization, regulatory acceptance, and industrial scalability. Finally, we discuss three application-oriented pathways for food-industry translation: high-throughput screening platforms, personalized formulation testing, and multi-organ microphysiological systems for systemic efficacy and safety assessment. As the field matures, GOC technology may serve as a supportive tool for evidence-based functional food development by bridging conventional in vitro assays and human intervention studies.

功能食品评价的微流控肠道芯片模型:从消化动力学到个性化营养。
准确评估功能性食品成分的胃肠道命运对于证实健康益处至关重要。然而,传统的体外模型并不能完全捕捉人类肠道的动态、多细胞和物理化学环境,从而造成预测差距。微流控芯片肠道(GOC)技术通过将流体流动、机械线索和多细胞共培养整合到一个可控的仿生平台中,提供了一种微生理方法。本文综述了GOC系统在评价食品生物活性方面的潜在应用。我们首先总结了核心设计原则,包括仿生建筑、材料选择、机械刺激、剪切应力和氧或化学梯度控制。然后我们讨论了它们在顺序消化、肠道吸收、屏障评估、宿主-微生物群相互作用、疾病特异性建模和个性化营养方面的应用。我们对GOC系统的优势和局限性进行了平衡分析,重点是在特定环境下的生理相关性、实时监测、材料相关的分析偏差、生物变异性、吞吐量、标准化、监管接受度和工业可扩展性。最后,我们讨论了食品工业翻译的三个面向应用的途径:高通量筛选平台,个性化配方测试和多器官微生理系统,用于系统功效和安全性评估。随着该领域的成熟,GOC技术可以通过连接传统的体外检测和人为干预研究,作为基于证据的功能性食品开发的支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
26.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (CRFSFS) is an online peer-reviewed journal established in 2002. It aims to provide scientists with unique and comprehensive reviews covering various aspects of food science and technology. CRFSFS publishes in-depth reviews addressing the chemical, microbiological, physical, sensory, and nutritional properties of foods, as well as food processing, engineering, analytical methods, and packaging. Manuscripts should contribute new insights and recommendations to the scientific knowledge on the topic. The journal prioritizes recent developments and encourages critical assessment of experimental design and interpretation of results. Topics related to food safety, such as preventive controls, ingredient contaminants, storage, food authenticity, and adulteration, are considered. Reviews on food hazards must demonstrate validity and reliability in real food systems, not just in model systems. Additionally, reviews on nutritional properties should provide a realistic perspective on how foods influence health, considering processing and storage effects on bioactivity. The journal also accepts reviews on consumer behavior, risk assessment, food regulations, and post-harvest physiology. Authors are encouraged to consult the Editor in Chief before submission to ensure topic suitability. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on analytical and sensory methods, quality control, and food safety approaches are welcomed, with authors advised to follow IFIS Good review practice guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书