Measuring Mankeeping: Development and Validation of a Scale Assessing How Women Experience the Impact of Men's Declining Social Networks

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Vincent O. Mancini, Briana N. Guerrini, James J. Clarke, Dylan P. Vergara, Zac E. Seidler, Angelica P. Ferrara
{"title":"Measuring Mankeeping: Development and Validation of a Scale Assessing How Women Experience the Impact of Men's Declining Social Networks","authors":"Vincent O. Mancini, Briana N. Guerrini, James J. Clarke, Dylan P. Vergara, Zac E. Seidler, Angelica P. Ferrara","doi":"10.1007/s11199-026-01661-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:italic>Mankeeping</jats:italic> was theorized as the unreciprocated labor women take on to compensate for losses in men’s social networks, thereby reducing the burden on families, heterosexual bonds, and men. However, there is currently no validated instrument that can reliably assess this theory. Across two studies, this paper aimed to develop and validate a scale to evaluate women’s experiences of <jats:italic>mankeeping</jats:italic> . Study 1 describes the scale development process using data derived from 402 heterosexually partnered women residing in the United States. Exploratory factor analysis showed a six-factor solution for a 46-item instrument, titled the <jats:italic>Mankeeping Scale – Partner Report</jats:italic> (MSPR), which demonstrated good reliability and validity. Study 2 tested the initial factor structure and measurement invariance of the MSPR in a sample of women in the United Kingdom ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 395). Confirmatory factor analyses revealed the original six-factor model provides the best model fit. Results provide strong evidence for the configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance of the MSPR across both countries. Based on this invariance, additional analyses were performed on all data ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 797) to develop and validate a brief 18-item version of the MSPR, which retained similar psychometric properties to the 46-item scale. The MSPR now equips researchers, clinicians, and policymakers with an instrument that quantifies how women’s mankeeping intersects with losses in men’s social networks and relationship functioning, informing or monitoring future interventions. Further innovation, such as creating a companion scale from men’s perspective, will enhance our understanding of this phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":48425,"journal":{"name":"Sex Roles","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Roles","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-026-01661-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mankeeping was theorized as the unreciprocated labor women take on to compensate for losses in men’s social networks, thereby reducing the burden on families, heterosexual bonds, and men. However, there is currently no validated instrument that can reliably assess this theory. Across two studies, this paper aimed to develop and validate a scale to evaluate women’s experiences of mankeeping . Study 1 describes the scale development process using data derived from 402 heterosexually partnered women residing in the United States. Exploratory factor analysis showed a six-factor solution for a 46-item instrument, titled the Mankeeping Scale – Partner Report (MSPR), which demonstrated good reliability and validity. Study 2 tested the initial factor structure and measurement invariance of the MSPR in a sample of women in the United Kingdom ( N = 395). Confirmatory factor analyses revealed the original six-factor model provides the best model fit. Results provide strong evidence for the configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance of the MSPR across both countries. Based on this invariance, additional analyses were performed on all data ( N = 797) to develop and validate a brief 18-item version of the MSPR, which retained similar psychometric properties to the 46-item scale. The MSPR now equips researchers, clinicians, and policymakers with an instrument that quantifies how women’s mankeeping intersects with losses in men’s social networks and relationship functioning, informing or monitoring future interventions. Further innovation, such as creating a companion scale from men’s perspective, will enhance our understanding of this phenomenon.
测量男性行为:一个评估女性如何体验男性社交网络衰退影响的量表的开发和验证
从理论上讲,男权是女性承担的无偿劳动,以弥补男性在社交网络中的损失,从而减轻家庭、异性恋关系和男性的负担。然而,目前还没有有效的工具可以可靠地评估这一理论。在两项研究中,本文旨在开发和验证一个评估女性男厕经验的量表。研究1描述了量表的发展过程,使用了402名居住在美国的异性恋伴侣女性的数据。探索性因子分析显示,对46项量表——伴侣报告(MSPR)有6个因子的解决方案,具有良好的信度和效度。研究2检验了英国女性样本(N = 395)中MSPR的初始因素结构和测量不变性。验证性因子分析表明,原来的六因子模型提供了最佳的模型拟合。结果为两国MSPR的结构、度量、标量和严格不变性提供了强有力的证据。基于这种不变性,对所有数据(N = 797)进行了额外的分析,以开发和验证一个简短的18项MSPR版本,它保留了与46项量表相似的心理测量特性。MSPR现在为研究人员、临床医生和政策制定者提供了一种工具,可以量化女性维持男性生活与男性社会网络和关系功能的损失之间的关系,为未来的干预提供信息或监测。进一步的创新,例如从男性的角度创建伴侣量表,将增强我们对这一现象的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sex Roles
Sex Roles Multiple-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Sex Roles: A Journal of Research is a global, multidisciplinary, scholarly, social and behavioral science journal with a feminist perspective. It publishes original research reports as well as original theoretical papers and conceptual review articles that explore how gender organizes people’s lives and their surrounding worlds, including gender identities, belief systems, representations, interactions, relations, organizations, institutions, and statuses. The range of topics covered is broad and dynamic, including but not limited to the study of gendered attitudes, stereotyping, and sexism; gendered contexts, culture, and power; the intersections of gender with race, class, sexual orientation, age, and other statuses and identities; body image; violence; gender (including masculinities) and feminist identities; human sexuality; communication studies; work and organizations; gendered development across the life span or life course; mental, physical, and reproductive health and health care; sports; interpersonal relationships and attraction; activism and social change; economic, political, and legal inequities; and methodological challenges and innovations in doing gender research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书