Vincent O. Mancini, Briana N. Guerrini, James J. Clarke, Dylan P. Vergara, Zac E. Seidler, Angelica P. Ferrara
{"title":"Measuring Mankeeping: Development and Validation of a Scale Assessing How Women Experience the Impact of Men's Declining Social Networks","authors":"Vincent O. Mancini, Briana N. Guerrini, James J. Clarke, Dylan P. Vergara, Zac E. Seidler, Angelica P. Ferrara","doi":"10.1007/s11199-026-01661-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:italic>Mankeeping</jats:italic> was theorized as the unreciprocated labor women take on to compensate for losses in men’s social networks, thereby reducing the burden on families, heterosexual bonds, and men. However, there is currently no validated instrument that can reliably assess this theory. Across two studies, this paper aimed to develop and validate a scale to evaluate women’s experiences of <jats:italic>mankeeping</jats:italic> . Study 1 describes the scale development process using data derived from 402 heterosexually partnered women residing in the United States. Exploratory factor analysis showed a six-factor solution for a 46-item instrument, titled the <jats:italic>Mankeeping Scale – Partner Report</jats:italic> (MSPR), which demonstrated good reliability and validity. Study 2 tested the initial factor structure and measurement invariance of the MSPR in a sample of women in the United Kingdom ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 395). Confirmatory factor analyses revealed the original six-factor model provides the best model fit. Results provide strong evidence for the configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance of the MSPR across both countries. Based on this invariance, additional analyses were performed on all data ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 797) to develop and validate a brief 18-item version of the MSPR, which retained similar psychometric properties to the 46-item scale. The MSPR now equips researchers, clinicians, and policymakers with an instrument that quantifies how women’s mankeeping intersects with losses in men’s social networks and relationship functioning, informing or monitoring future interventions. Further innovation, such as creating a companion scale from men’s perspective, will enhance our understanding of this phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":48425,"journal":{"name":"Sex Roles","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sex Roles","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-026-01661-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mankeeping was theorized as the unreciprocated labor women take on to compensate for losses in men’s social networks, thereby reducing the burden on families, heterosexual bonds, and men. However, there is currently no validated instrument that can reliably assess this theory. Across two studies, this paper aimed to develop and validate a scale to evaluate women’s experiences of mankeeping . Study 1 describes the scale development process using data derived from 402 heterosexually partnered women residing in the United States. Exploratory factor analysis showed a six-factor solution for a 46-item instrument, titled the Mankeeping Scale – Partner Report (MSPR), which demonstrated good reliability and validity. Study 2 tested the initial factor structure and measurement invariance of the MSPR in a sample of women in the United Kingdom ( N = 395). Confirmatory factor analyses revealed the original six-factor model provides the best model fit. Results provide strong evidence for the configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance of the MSPR across both countries. Based on this invariance, additional analyses were performed on all data ( N = 797) to develop and validate a brief 18-item version of the MSPR, which retained similar psychometric properties to the 46-item scale. The MSPR now equips researchers, clinicians, and policymakers with an instrument that quantifies how women’s mankeeping intersects with losses in men’s social networks and relationship functioning, informing or monitoring future interventions. Further innovation, such as creating a companion scale from men’s perspective, will enhance our understanding of this phenomenon.
期刊介绍:
Sex Roles: A Journal of Research is a global, multidisciplinary, scholarly, social and behavioral science journal with a feminist perspective. It publishes original research reports as well as original theoretical papers and conceptual review articles that explore how gender organizes people’s lives and their surrounding worlds, including gender identities, belief systems, representations, interactions, relations, organizations, institutions, and statuses. The range of topics covered is broad and dynamic, including but not limited to the study of gendered attitudes, stereotyping, and sexism; gendered contexts, culture, and power; the intersections of gender with race, class, sexual orientation, age, and other statuses and identities; body image; violence; gender (including masculinities) and feminist identities; human sexuality; communication studies; work and organizations; gendered development across the life span or life course; mental, physical, and reproductive health and health care; sports; interpersonal relationships and attraction; activism and social change; economic, political, and legal inequities; and methodological challenges and innovations in doing gender research.