Effects and Characteristics of Mathematics Interventions for Students with Co-Occurring Difficulties in Mathematics and Reading: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

IF 11.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Ellinor Waaland, Vibeke Rønneberg, Dieuwer ten Braak
{"title":"Effects and Characteristics of Mathematics Interventions for Students with Co-Occurring Difficulties in Mathematics and Reading: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis","authors":"Ellinor Waaland, Vibeke Rønneberg, Dieuwer ten Braak","doi":"10.1007/s10648-026-10184-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among students who have learning difficulties in mathematics and reading, co-occurring difficulties in both domains are highly prevalent. Research has shown that students with co-occurring mathematics and reading difficulties tend to have greater cognitive challenges than students who have difficulties with either mathematics or reading. It is plausible that these cognitive difficulties can influence the responsiveness to interventions. This systematic review with meta-analysis investigated the effects and characteristics of mathematics interventions in early elementary students (G1-G3) with co-occurring difficulties in mathematics and reading, as well as how these students had been identified in the included studies. Based on a comprehensive literature search, only nine studies ( <jats:italic>k</jats:italic> = 1036) met the predefined inclusion criteria. The available evidence indicates a positive overall mean effect of mathematics interventions on mathematical outcomes for students with co-occurring mathematics and reading difficulties ( <jats:italic>g</jats:italic> = 0.47 for the model with outliers; <jats:italic>g</jats:italic> = 0.52 for the model without outliers). However, this result should be interpreted with caution, given the heterogeneity of the evidence and the relatively small evidence base. The synthesis of intervention characteristics highlighted that effective mathematics interventions commonly included explicit instruction, which was classified as potentially relevant for low-performing students, as well as overall structure, repetition, and strategy learning, which were classified as potentially relevant to support executive function. Finally, findings revealed considerable variation in the cut-off criteria used to identify students with co-occurring mathematics and reading difficulties. Implications of the findings and directions for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"216 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10184-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among students who have learning difficulties in mathematics and reading, co-occurring difficulties in both domains are highly prevalent. Research has shown that students with co-occurring mathematics and reading difficulties tend to have greater cognitive challenges than students who have difficulties with either mathematics or reading. It is plausible that these cognitive difficulties can influence the responsiveness to interventions. This systematic review with meta-analysis investigated the effects and characteristics of mathematics interventions in early elementary students (G1-G3) with co-occurring difficulties in mathematics and reading, as well as how these students had been identified in the included studies. Based on a comprehensive literature search, only nine studies ( k = 1036) met the predefined inclusion criteria. The available evidence indicates a positive overall mean effect of mathematics interventions on mathematical outcomes for students with co-occurring mathematics and reading difficulties ( g = 0.47 for the model with outliers; g = 0.52 for the model without outliers). However, this result should be interpreted with caution, given the heterogeneity of the evidence and the relatively small evidence base. The synthesis of intervention characteristics highlighted that effective mathematics interventions commonly included explicit instruction, which was classified as potentially relevant for low-performing students, as well as overall structure, repetition, and strategy learning, which were classified as potentially relevant to support executive function. Finally, findings revealed considerable variation in the cut-off criteria used to identify students with co-occurring mathematics and reading difficulties. Implications of the findings and directions for future research are discussed.
数学干预对数学和阅读同时出现困难学生的效果和特点:一项meta分析的系统评价
在数学和阅读有学习困难的学生中,在这两个领域同时出现的困难是非常普遍的。研究表明,同时存在数学和阅读困难的学生往往比那些既没有数学也没有阅读困难的学生面临更大的认知挑战。这些认知困难可能会影响对干预的反应,这是合理的。本研究采用荟萃分析的系统回顾研究了数学干预对同时存在数学和阅读困难的小学生(G1-G3)的影响和特征,以及这些学生在纳入的研究中是如何被识别的。通过全面的文献检索,只有9项研究(k = 1036)符合预定的纳入标准。现有证据表明,数学干预对同时存在数学和阅读困难的学生的数学成绩有积极的总体平均影响(在有异常值的模型中g = 0.47;在没有异常值的模型中g = 0.52)。然而,考虑到证据的异质性和相对较小的证据基础,应该谨慎解释这一结果。干预特征的综合强调了有效的数学干预通常包括明确的指导,这被归类为与表现不佳的学生潜在相关,以及整体结构、重复和策略学习,这被归类为与支持执行功能潜在相关。最后,研究结果显示,用于识别同时存在数学和阅读困难的学生的截止标准存在相当大的差异。讨论了研究结果的意义和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书