The Organic Cosmos: Cybernetics and Politics of Relations Between Arendt and Latour

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Toni Čerkez
{"title":"The Organic Cosmos: Cybernetics and Politics of Relations Between Arendt and Latour","authors":"Toni Čerkez","doi":"10.1093/ips/olag031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relational thinking in International Relations Theory (IRT) and International Political Sociology (IPS) critiques Cartesian binaries by advancing relational ontologies of politics. Central to this critique is Bruno Latour’s theory of modernity, which challenges Cartesianism and calls for an emancipatory break from it. I engage Latour through a dialogue with Hannah Arendt’s account of the shift from Being to Process, which she links to cybernetics and the dominance of labor in the vita activa. I reinterpret this shift as a move from Cartesian mechanism (Arendt’s Being) to what I call organic cosmology (Arendt’s Process), reflecting digitalised reality. I argue that IRT and IPS have under-theorized this cosmological shift, with consequences for the politics of relations. Cybernetics inaugurated organic cosmology by positing that information constitutes relations. Yet information is treated as separate from matter, producing a post-Cartesian dualism left largely unaddressed by Latour and contemporary IRT and IPS. This binary underpins computational capitalism by enabling data extractivism as an ordering logic. Drawing on debates on earth-system governance and algorithmic ontology, I argue that neglecting cybernetics as a cosmological formation leaves relational IRT and IPS ill-equipped to grasp how cybernetic imaginaries structure politics of relations and reproduce new dualisms, weakening their critical purchase.","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relational thinking in International Relations Theory (IRT) and International Political Sociology (IPS) critiques Cartesian binaries by advancing relational ontologies of politics. Central to this critique is Bruno Latour’s theory of modernity, which challenges Cartesianism and calls for an emancipatory break from it. I engage Latour through a dialogue with Hannah Arendt’s account of the shift from Being to Process, which she links to cybernetics and the dominance of labor in the vita activa. I reinterpret this shift as a move from Cartesian mechanism (Arendt’s Being) to what I call organic cosmology (Arendt’s Process), reflecting digitalised reality. I argue that IRT and IPS have under-theorized this cosmological shift, with consequences for the politics of relations. Cybernetics inaugurated organic cosmology by positing that information constitutes relations. Yet information is treated as separate from matter, producing a post-Cartesian dualism left largely unaddressed by Latour and contemporary IRT and IPS. This binary underpins computational capitalism by enabling data extractivism as an ordering logic. Drawing on debates on earth-system governance and algorithmic ontology, I argue that neglecting cybernetics as a cosmological formation leaves relational IRT and IPS ill-equipped to grasp how cybernetic imaginaries structure politics of relations and reproduce new dualisms, weakening their critical purchase.
有机宇宙:阿伦特与拉图尔关系的控制论与政治学
国际关系理论(IRT)和国际政治社会学(IPS)中的关系思维通过推进政治的关系本体论来批判笛卡尔二元理论。这种批判的核心是布鲁诺·拉图尔(Bruno Latour)的现代性理论,该理论挑战了笛卡尔主义,并呼吁从笛卡尔主义中解放出来。我通过与汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)关于从存在到过程的转变的对话来吸引拉图尔,她将其与控制论和劳动在活跃生活中的主导地位联系起来。我将这种转变重新解释为从笛卡尔机制(阿伦特的存在)到我所谓的有机宇宙学(阿伦特的过程)的转变,反映了数字化的现实。我认为IRT和IPS没有把这种宇宙论的转变理论化,这对关系的政治产生了影响。控制论通过假定信息构成关系开创了有机宇宙学。然而,信息被视为与物质分离,产生了后笛卡尔的二元论,这在很大程度上没有被拉图尔和当代的IRT和IPS所解决。这种二进制通过将数据提取作为一种排序逻辑来支持计算资本主义。通过对地球系统治理和算法本体论的讨论,我认为忽视控制论作为一种宇宙学形式会使关系IRT和IPS无法掌握控制论想象如何构建关系政治并再现新的二元论,从而削弱了它们的批判性购买。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: International Political Sociology (IPS), responds to the need for more productive collaboration among political sociologists, international relations specialists and sociopolitical theorists. It is especially concerned with challenges arising from contemporary transformations of social, political, and global orders given the statist forms of traditional sociologies and the marginalization of social processes in many approaches to international relations. IPS is committed to theoretical innovation, new modes of empirical research and the geographical and cultural diversification of research beyond the usual circuits of European and North-American scholarship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书