Outcome-Based Language Teaching in EMI Listening: Balancing Accountability With Ungraded Supports for Low-Proficiency Learners

IF 4.7 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Camik Wanhassan
{"title":"Outcome-Based Language Teaching in EMI Listening: Balancing Accountability With Ungraded Supports for Low-Proficiency Learners","authors":"Camik Wanhassan","doi":"10.1177/13621688261457415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Listening plays a critical yet undertheorized role in English-medium instruction (EMI), where subject courses are taught through English rather than learners’ first language, and access to disciplinary knowledge relies heavily on real-time comprehension of lectures and academic tasks not designed for language development. For low-proficiency students enrolled in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programmes, this creates a high-stakes learning condition in which assessment-driven accountability can intensify cognitive and affective pressure. While outcome-based education (OBE) offers curricular structure and transparency, it is frequently criticized for privileging measurable outcomes over sustained engagement and long-term skill development. This study examines how accountability in EMI listening courses can be structurally balanced with ungraded pedagogical supports to foster engagement and learning sustainability. Drawing on a three-year longitudinal reform of a compulsory elective EMI listening course, the study analyses how a design approach integrating graded accountability with collaborative learning, voluntary practice, and reflective work reshaped learners’ engagement and learning trajectories. Using a mixed-methods design combining descriptive and inferential quantitative analyses with thematic analysis of learner reflections, integrated through triangulation, the analysis synthesizes performance data, engagement logs, and learner reflections collected from 533 low-proficiency STEM learners across three cohorts. Findings indicate that assessment-driven designs alone were insufficient to support learning progression in EMI listening. When graded accountability was complemented by ungraded, low-risk supports, learners demonstrated reduced failure risk, sustained voluntary engagement, and heightened reflective awareness of listening strategies and goals. Listening was increasingly construed not as a short-term course requirement, but as a transferable academic skill. The study contributes to EMI and language teaching research by theorizing EMI listening as a pedagogically constrained condition and by illustrating how OBE can be enacted as a supportive, rather than compliance-oriented, design. The findings offer transferable design principles for balancing accountability with ungraded pedagogical supports in EMI listening courses beyond the immediate institutional context.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688261457415","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Listening plays a critical yet undertheorized role in English-medium instruction (EMI), where subject courses are taught through English rather than learners’ first language, and access to disciplinary knowledge relies heavily on real-time comprehension of lectures and academic tasks not designed for language development. For low-proficiency students enrolled in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programmes, this creates a high-stakes learning condition in which assessment-driven accountability can intensify cognitive and affective pressure. While outcome-based education (OBE) offers curricular structure and transparency, it is frequently criticized for privileging measurable outcomes over sustained engagement and long-term skill development. This study examines how accountability in EMI listening courses can be structurally balanced with ungraded pedagogical supports to foster engagement and learning sustainability. Drawing on a three-year longitudinal reform of a compulsory elective EMI listening course, the study analyses how a design approach integrating graded accountability with collaborative learning, voluntary practice, and reflective work reshaped learners’ engagement and learning trajectories. Using a mixed-methods design combining descriptive and inferential quantitative analyses with thematic analysis of learner reflections, integrated through triangulation, the analysis synthesizes performance data, engagement logs, and learner reflections collected from 533 low-proficiency STEM learners across three cohorts. Findings indicate that assessment-driven designs alone were insufficient to support learning progression in EMI listening. When graded accountability was complemented by ungraded, low-risk supports, learners demonstrated reduced failure risk, sustained voluntary engagement, and heightened reflective awareness of listening strategies and goals. Listening was increasingly construed not as a short-term course requirement, but as a transferable academic skill. The study contributes to EMI and language teaching research by theorizing EMI listening as a pedagogically constrained condition and by illustrating how OBE can be enacted as a supportive, rather than compliance-oriented, design. The findings offer transferable design principles for balancing accountability with ungraded pedagogical supports in EMI listening courses beyond the immediate institutional context.
EMI听力中基于结果的语言教学:平衡问责与对低水平学习者的不分级支持
听力在英语媒介教学(EMI)中扮演着至关重要但尚未得到充分理论解释的角色,在EMI中,学科课程是通过英语而不是学习者的母语教授的,获得学科知识在很大程度上依赖于对讲座和学术任务的实时理解,而不是为语言发展而设计的。对于参加科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)课程的低水平学生来说,这创造了一个高风险的学习条件,其中评估驱动的问责制可能会加剧认知和情感压力。虽然基于结果的教育(OBE)提供了课程结构和透明度,但它经常被批评为优先考虑可衡量的结果,而不是持续的参与和长期的技能发展。本研究探讨了EMI听力课程的问责制如何在结构上与不分级的教学支持相平衡,以促进参与和学习的可持续性。通过对一门强制性选修EMI听力课程进行为期三年的纵向改革,本研究分析了将分级问责制与协作学习、自愿实践和反思工作相结合的设计方法如何重塑学习者的参与度和学习轨迹。采用混合方法设计,将描述性和推断性定量分析与学习者反思的主题分析相结合,通过三角测量进行整合,分析综合了从三个队列的533名低水平STEM学习者中收集的绩效数据、参与日志和学习者反思。研究结果表明,仅靠评估驱动的设计不足以支持EMI听力的学习进展。当分级问责制与非分级、低风险的支持相辅相成时,学习者表现出更低的失败风险,持续的自愿参与,并提高了对听力策略和目标的反思意识。听力越来越不被视为短期课程要求,而是一种可转换的学术技能。该研究通过将EMI听力理论化为一种教学上的约束条件,并通过说明如何将出窍作为一种支持性设计,而不是以服从为导向的设计,为EMI和语言教学研究做出了贡献。研究结果提供了可转移的设计原则,用于在EMI听力课程中平衡问责制和不分级的教学支持,而不是直接的机构背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书