Subject–verb agreement by Turkish speakers of English: Differential cue-weighting in L1 and L2 and distinct mechanisms for comprehension and production

IF 2.4 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Nazik Dinçtopal Deniz, Özge Bakay, Cem Murat Deniz
{"title":"Subject–verb agreement by Turkish speakers of English: Differential cue-weighting in L1 and L2 and distinct mechanisms for comprehension and production","authors":"Nazik Dinçtopal Deniz, Özge Bakay, Cem Murat Deniz","doi":"10.1017/s1366728926101497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employing a self-paced reading experiment, a read-aloud production task and a pen-and-paper questionnaire, we examined if Turkish (L2) and native (L1) speakers of English rely on similar or different mechanisms in comprehending and producing English subject–verb number agreement. The results showed that the syntactic distance of an attractor to the head noun affected the L1 speakers’ parsing decisions, while the L2 speakers were influenced by its linear proximity to the verb. The results also showed <jats:italic>singular attraction</jats:italic> in comprehension for both groups and (a tendency for) <jats:italic>plural attraction</jats:italic> in production. We argue that L1 and L2 speakers differ in the sources of attraction and in their cue weighting/encoding while processing and producing S-V agreement. Whereas syntactic proximity is more crucial in the L1 speakers’ agreement computation, L2 speakers weigh linear distance cue more heavily. We also argue that S-V agreement computation is governed through different mechanisms in comprehension and production.","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"319 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728926101497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Employing a self-paced reading experiment, a read-aloud production task and a pen-and-paper questionnaire, we examined if Turkish (L2) and native (L1) speakers of English rely on similar or different mechanisms in comprehending and producing English subject–verb number agreement. The results showed that the syntactic distance of an attractor to the head noun affected the L1 speakers’ parsing decisions, while the L2 speakers were influenced by its linear proximity to the verb. The results also showed singular attraction in comprehension for both groups and (a tendency for) plural attraction in production. We argue that L1 and L2 speakers differ in the sources of attraction and in their cue weighting/encoding while processing and producing S-V agreement. Whereas syntactic proximity is more crucial in the L1 speakers’ agreement computation, L2 speakers weigh linear distance cue more heavily. We also argue that S-V agreement computation is governed through different mechanisms in comprehension and production.
说英语的土耳其人的主谓一致:第一语言和第二语言线索权重的差异以及理解和产生的不同机制
采用自定节奏阅读实验、大声朗读生成任务和纸笔问卷,我们研究了土耳其语(L2)和母语(L1)英语使用者在理解和生成英语主动数一致性方面是否依赖相似或不同的机制。结果表明,吸引子与头名词的句法距离影响母语说话者的句法分析决策,而第二语言说话者则受其与动词的线性接近程度的影响。结果还显示了两组在理解上的单一吸引力和在生产上的(一种)多重吸引力。我们认为,母语和第二语言说话者在吸引力的来源和线索加权/编码在处理和产生S-V协议时是不同的。虽然句法接近性在母语说话者的共识计算中更为重要,但第二语言说话者更看重线性距离线索。我们还认为,S-V协议计算在理解和产生过程中受到不同机制的支配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书