Tightening up under threat: Social class shapes the strength of norms.

IF 6.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Ying Lin,Jesse R Harrington,Michele J Gelfand
{"title":"Tightening up under threat: Social class shapes the strength of norms.","authors":"Ying Lin,Jesse R Harrington,Michele J Gelfand","doi":"10.1037/pspi0000524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social class is more than an economic divide; it engenders distinct cultural patterns. Building on tightness-looseness theory, we identify a critical yet overlooked dimension of within-society cultural variation across social class contexts: the strength of social norms. We propose that lower class contexts foster tighter cultures, characterized by stricter norms and lower tolerance for deviance, as a functional adaptation to chronic socioeconomic threat. Across five studies, we demonstrate that the lower class culture is tighter than the higher class one. Study 1 (57 countries) reveals that lower class individuals are less tolerant of norm violations and more inclined to punish them. Meta-analyses of global data over 52 years show that this divergence in tightness-looseness is associated with a broader trade-off between order and openness: The lower class emphasizes social order yet exhibits lower openness to new people, ideas, and change compared to the higher class (Study 2). Studies 3 and 4 identify the psychological mechanisms, showing that lower social class is associated with greater exposure to socioeconomic threat and heightened vigilance toward danger, which in turn are associated with greater tightness. These threat-based adaptations are further transmitted and reinforced through parental practices. Finally, Study 5 provides experimental evidence that lower class contexts causally increase the need for cultural tightness. By elucidating how social class shapes the experience, adherence, and enforcement of norms, we offer a new framework for understanding cultural differentiation within societies-revealing tightness-looseness as a product of structurally unequal threat exposure that is transmitted across generations and may itself perpetuate class inequality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social class is more than an economic divide; it engenders distinct cultural patterns. Building on tightness-looseness theory, we identify a critical yet overlooked dimension of within-society cultural variation across social class contexts: the strength of social norms. We propose that lower class contexts foster tighter cultures, characterized by stricter norms and lower tolerance for deviance, as a functional adaptation to chronic socioeconomic threat. Across five studies, we demonstrate that the lower class culture is tighter than the higher class one. Study 1 (57 countries) reveals that lower class individuals are less tolerant of norm violations and more inclined to punish them. Meta-analyses of global data over 52 years show that this divergence in tightness-looseness is associated with a broader trade-off between order and openness: The lower class emphasizes social order yet exhibits lower openness to new people, ideas, and change compared to the higher class (Study 2). Studies 3 and 4 identify the psychological mechanisms, showing that lower social class is associated with greater exposure to socioeconomic threat and heightened vigilance toward danger, which in turn are associated with greater tightness. These threat-based adaptations are further transmitted and reinforced through parental practices. Finally, Study 5 provides experimental evidence that lower class contexts causally increase the need for cultural tightness. By elucidating how social class shapes the experience, adherence, and enforcement of norms, we offer a new framework for understanding cultural differentiation within societies-revealing tightness-looseness as a product of structurally unequal threat exposure that is transmitted across generations and may itself perpetuate class inequality. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
在威胁下收紧:社会阶级塑造了规范的强度。
社会阶层不仅仅是一个经济鸿沟;它产生了独特的文化模式。在松紧理论的基础上,我们确定了跨社会阶级背景的社会内部文化差异的一个关键但被忽视的维度:社会规范的力量。我们认为,较低的阶级背景促进了更紧密的文化,其特征是更严格的规范和对越轨行为的更低容忍度,作为对长期社会经济威胁的功能性适应。在五项研究中,我们证明了下层文化比上层文化更紧密。研究1(57个国家)表明,下层社会的个体对违反规范的行为不太宽容,更倾向于惩罚他们。52年来全球数据的荟萃分析表明,这种从紧与从松的差异与秩序与开放之间更广泛的权衡有关:下层阶级强调社会秩序,但与上层阶级相比,对新人、思想和变化的开放程度较低(研究2)。研究3和4确定了心理机制,表明较低的社会阶层与更大的社会经济威胁和对危险的高度警惕有关,而对危险的高度警惕又与更大的紧张有关。这些基于威胁的适应通过父母的做法进一步传播和加强。最后,研究5提供了实验证据,证明较低的阶级背景会导致对文化紧密性的需求增加。通过阐明社会阶级如何塑造规范的经验、遵守和执行,我们为理解社会中的文化差异提供了一个新的框架——揭示了作为结构上不平等的威胁暴露的产物的紧与松,这种威胁暴露是代代相传的,它本身可能使阶级不平等永续下去。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书