Testing measurement invariance of the Brief Symptom Inventory across race, sex, and time among adults with cocaine use disorder.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Melissa R Schick,Yudilyn Jaramillo,Brian D Kiluk,Charla Nich,Donna LaPaglia,Angela M Haeny
{"title":"Testing measurement invariance of the Brief Symptom Inventory across race, sex, and time among adults with cocaine use disorder.","authors":"Melissa R Schick,Yudilyn Jaramillo,Brian D Kiluk,Charla Nich,Donna LaPaglia,Angela M Haeny","doi":"10.1037/pas0001486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) is a commonly used measure to understand the influence of psychological distress on substance use treatment outcomes. However, few studies have examined whether the BSI functions equivalently across groups to allow for interpretable comparisons among individuals who use substances. The present study evaluated measurement invariance of the full 53-item BSI and the BSI-18 across race, sex, and time among individuals with cocaine use disorder. Data from seven clinical trials evaluating behavioral and/or pharmacological treatments for cocaine use were combined, providing a total sample of 629 participants with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, cocaine abuse/dependence (42.0% Black, 58.0% White; 38.3% female, 61.5% male; Mage = 39.74 years, SD = 9.49). Factor analyses supported an eight-factor model for the BSI and a three-factor model for the BSI-18, largely consistent with recommended scoring guidelines. We did not find support for measurement invariance of either the full BSI or the BSI-18 across race, sex, or time. After model trimming, we were able to identify models for which invariance testing could be conducted. We found evidence for weak factorial invariance of versions of the BSI and BSI-18 by race and versions of the BSI by sex, and strict factorial invariance of versions of the BSI by time and versions of the BSI-18 by sex and time. Findings suggest that caution is warranted when making comparisons across race, sex, or time using the full BSI or BSI-18 among individuals seeking treatment for cocaine use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) is a commonly used measure to understand the influence of psychological distress on substance use treatment outcomes. However, few studies have examined whether the BSI functions equivalently across groups to allow for interpretable comparisons among individuals who use substances. The present study evaluated measurement invariance of the full 53-item BSI and the BSI-18 across race, sex, and time among individuals with cocaine use disorder. Data from seven clinical trials evaluating behavioral and/or pharmacological treatments for cocaine use were combined, providing a total sample of 629 participants with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, cocaine abuse/dependence (42.0% Black, 58.0% White; 38.3% female, 61.5% male; Mage = 39.74 years, SD = 9.49). Factor analyses supported an eight-factor model for the BSI and a three-factor model for the BSI-18, largely consistent with recommended scoring guidelines. We did not find support for measurement invariance of either the full BSI or the BSI-18 across race, sex, or time. After model trimming, we were able to identify models for which invariance testing could be conducted. We found evidence for weak factorial invariance of versions of the BSI and BSI-18 by race and versions of the BSI by sex, and strict factorial invariance of versions of the BSI by time and versions of the BSI-18 by sex and time. Findings suggest that caution is warranted when making comparisons across race, sex, or time using the full BSI or BSI-18 among individuals seeking treatment for cocaine use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
成人可卡因使用障碍患者简短症状量表在种族、性别和时间上的不变性检验。
简要症状量表(BSI)是了解心理困扰对药物使用治疗结果影响的常用测量方法。然而,很少有研究调查BSI是否在不同群体中具有相同的功能,以便在使用物质的个体之间进行可解释的比较。本研究评估了可卡因使用障碍个体的53项BSI和BSI-18在种族、性别和时间上的测量不变性。结合7项评估可卡因使用行为和/或药物治疗的临床试验的数据,提供629名参与者的样本,第四版《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》,可卡因滥用/依赖(黑人42.0%,白人58.0%;女性38.3%,男性61.5%;年龄= 39.74岁,SD = 9.49)。因子分析支持BSI的八因子模型和BSI-18的三因子模型,与推荐的评分指南基本一致。我们没有发现支持完整BSI或BSI-18在种族、性别或时间上的测量不变性。在模型修剪之后,我们能够确定可以进行不变性测试的模型。我们发现了BSI版本和BSI-18版本按种族和BSI版本按性别的弱因子不变性的证据,BSI版本按时间和BSI-18版本按性别和时间的严格因子不变性。研究结果表明,在寻求可卡因使用治疗的个体中使用完整BSI或BSI-18进行跨种族、性别或时间比较时,需要谨慎。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书