Global Landscape of Publicly Available Human Oral Microbiome Data.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
X Chen,L Jamieson,L S Weyrich,S Nath
{"title":"Global Landscape of Publicly Available Human Oral Microbiome Data.","authors":"X Chen,L Jamieson,L S Weyrich,S Nath","doi":"10.1177/00220345261456612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite rapid growth in oral microbiome research, it remains unclear how well publicly available data reflect the diversity of the global human population. This study systematically evaluated the geographic and sampling-type representativeness of publicly available human oral microbiome data. A global meta-research analysis of publicly available human oral microbiome records in the NCBI BioSample database released up to December 31, 2025, was conducted. Records were retrieved, harmonized, and analyzed across 4 dimensions: geographic origin, oral sampling type, temporal trends, and population-adjusted representation using a derived representation index (RI). A total of 222,454 BioSamples from 1,600 studies were identified, spanning 92 countries and 4 major oral sampling-type groups: oral fluids, oral mucosa and surfaces, dental plaque and calculus, and special or lesion-associated sites. Geographic distribution was highly concentrated; nearly half of all geographically annotated samples originated from the United States and China, while 61% of countries worldwide contributed no samples. Low- and middle-income regions, including Central and Southern Asia (RI = -12.76) and Sub-Saharan Africa (RI = -11.21), were underrepresented relative to their population sizes. Sampling-type distribution was similarly uneven, with saliva samples comprising more than half of all samples. In contrast, disease-relevant sites, including carious lesions, periapical lesions, and the dental pulp, each represented less than 0.2% of the dataset. Together, these findings underscore that publicly available human oral microbiome data remain unevenly distributed across geographic origin and sampling types, reflecting structural and practical factors that have persisted over time. Deliberate efforts to improve global representation, sampling diversity, and metadata standardization are needed to build a more scientifically robust oral microbiome evidence base.","PeriodicalId":15596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"220345261456612"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345261456612","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite rapid growth in oral microbiome research, it remains unclear how well publicly available data reflect the diversity of the global human population. This study systematically evaluated the geographic and sampling-type representativeness of publicly available human oral microbiome data. A global meta-research analysis of publicly available human oral microbiome records in the NCBI BioSample database released up to December 31, 2025, was conducted. Records were retrieved, harmonized, and analyzed across 4 dimensions: geographic origin, oral sampling type, temporal trends, and population-adjusted representation using a derived representation index (RI). A total of 222,454 BioSamples from 1,600 studies were identified, spanning 92 countries and 4 major oral sampling-type groups: oral fluids, oral mucosa and surfaces, dental plaque and calculus, and special or lesion-associated sites. Geographic distribution was highly concentrated; nearly half of all geographically annotated samples originated from the United States and China, while 61% of countries worldwide contributed no samples. Low- and middle-income regions, including Central and Southern Asia (RI = -12.76) and Sub-Saharan Africa (RI = -11.21), were underrepresented relative to their population sizes. Sampling-type distribution was similarly uneven, with saliva samples comprising more than half of all samples. In contrast, disease-relevant sites, including carious lesions, periapical lesions, and the dental pulp, each represented less than 0.2% of the dataset. Together, these findings underscore that publicly available human oral microbiome data remain unevenly distributed across geographic origin and sampling types, reflecting structural and practical factors that have persisted over time. Deliberate efforts to improve global representation, sampling diversity, and metadata standardization are needed to build a more scientifically robust oral microbiome evidence base.
可公开获得的人类口腔微生物组数据的全球概况。
尽管口腔微生物组研究迅速发展,但目前尚不清楚公开数据在多大程度上反映了全球人口的多样性。本研究系统地评估了可公开获得的人类口腔微生物组数据的地理代表性和采样类型代表性。对截至2025年12月31日发布的NCBI BioSample数据库中公开可用的人类口腔微生物组记录进行了一项全球元研究分析。使用衍生表征指数(RI)检索、协调和分析了4个维度的记录:地理来源、口头抽样类型、时间趋势和人口调整表征。从92个国家和4个主要的口腔采样类型组(口腔液体、口腔黏膜和表面、牙菌斑和牙石以及特殊或病变相关部位)共确定了来自1600项研究的222454份生物样本。地理分布高度集中;近一半的地理注释样本来自美国和中国,而全球61%的国家没有提供样本。低收入和中等收入地区,包括中亚和南亚(RI = -12.76)和撒哈拉以南非洲(RI = -11.21),相对于其人口规模而言代表性不足。样本类型分布同样不均匀,唾液样本占所有样本的一半以上。相比之下,与疾病相关的部位,包括龋齿、根尖周病变和牙髓,各占数据集的不到0.2%。总之,这些发现强调,可公开获得的人类口腔微生物组数据在地理来源和采样类型上仍然不均匀分布,反映了结构和实际因素随着时间的推移而持续存在。为了建立一个更加科学可靠的口腔微生物组证据基础,需要有意识地努力改善全球代表性、采样多样性和元数据标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Research
Journal of Dental Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
155
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Research (JDR) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal committed to sharing new knowledge and information on all sciences related to dentistry and the oral cavity, covering health and disease. With monthly publications, JDR ensures timely communication of the latest research to the oral and dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书