Efficacy and safety of ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids in patients with abdominal surgical scars on the acoustic pathway.

IF 3
Junshu Li, Yong Wang, Chengqiu Qi, Changqing Pan, Jinyun Chen
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids in patients with abdominal surgical scars on the acoustic pathway.","authors":"Junshu Li, Yong Wang, Chengqiu Qi, Changqing Pan, Jinyun Chen","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2026.2670494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation for uterine fibroids in patients with abdominal wall scars on the acoustic pathway.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 608 patients were included in the retrospective analysis. Preoperative and postoperative pelvic MRI data, treatment data, and follow-up information were collected. Patients were divided into scar group (213 cases: 172 transverse and 41 longitudinal abdominal wall scars) and non-scar group (395 cases). Treatment efficacy, adverse events, and complications were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median fibroid ablation rates were similar in the scar and non-scar groups: 87.81% (IQR 78.20-98.80%) and 87.67% (IQR 75.18-96.75%), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.403). The incidence of skin-burning sensation during operation in the scar group was significantly higher than that in the non-scar group [15.96% (34/213) vs 8.35% (33/395), <i>p</i> = 0.004]. Postoperative abdominal wall MRT2WI signal changes occurred in 22.37% (136/608) of cases, mainly in the subcutaneous fat layer (50%, 68/136), appearing as patchy mixed high signal on MRT2WI. These changes were higher in the scar group than in the non-scar group [28.17% (60/213) vs 19.24% (76/395), <i>p</i> = 0.012]. However, these abnormalities resolved spontaneously without intervention. No serious adverse events or complications occurred in either group during or after treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abdominal wall surgical scars on the acoustic pathway do not significantly affect the safety and efficacy of USgHIFU for uterine fibroids.</p>","PeriodicalId":520653,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","volume":"43 1","pages":"2670494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2026.2670494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation for uterine fibroids in patients with abdominal wall scars on the acoustic pathway.

Methods: A total of 608 patients were included in the retrospective analysis. Preoperative and postoperative pelvic MRI data, treatment data, and follow-up information were collected. Patients were divided into scar group (213 cases: 172 transverse and 41 longitudinal abdominal wall scars) and non-scar group (395 cases). Treatment efficacy, adverse events, and complications were compared between groups.

Results: The median fibroid ablation rates were similar in the scar and non-scar groups: 87.81% (IQR 78.20-98.80%) and 87.67% (IQR 75.18-96.75%), respectively (p = 0.403). The incidence of skin-burning sensation during operation in the scar group was significantly higher than that in the non-scar group [15.96% (34/213) vs 8.35% (33/395), p = 0.004]. Postoperative abdominal wall MRT2WI signal changes occurred in 22.37% (136/608) of cases, mainly in the subcutaneous fat layer (50%, 68/136), appearing as patchy mixed high signal on MRT2WI. These changes were higher in the scar group than in the non-scar group [28.17% (60/213) vs 19.24% (76/395), p = 0.012]. However, these abnormalities resolved spontaneously without intervention. No serious adverse events or complications occurred in either group during or after treatment.

Conclusion: Abdominal wall surgical scars on the acoustic pathway do not significantly affect the safety and efficacy of USgHIFU for uterine fibroids.

超声消融术治疗经声道腹部手术瘢痕子宫肌瘤的疗效和安全性。
目的:探讨超声引导下高强度聚焦超声(USgHIFU)消融腹壁声道瘢痕子宫肌瘤的安全性和有效性。方法:对608例患者进行回顾性分析。收集术前、术后盆腔MRI资料、治疗资料及随访资料。患者分为疤痕组213例,其中横向腹壁疤痕172例,纵向腹壁疤痕41例,非疤痕组395例。比较两组治疗疗效、不良事件及并发症。结果:瘢痕组和非瘢痕组中位肌瘤消融率相近,分别为87.81% (IQR 78.20 ~ 98.80%)和87.67% (IQR 75.18 ~ 96.75%),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.403)。瘢痕组术中皮肤烧灼感发生率明显高于非瘢痕组[15.96% (34/213)vs 8.35% (33/395), p = 0.004]。术后腹壁MRT2WI信号改变占22.37%(136/608),主要表现在皮下脂肪层(50%,68/136),MRT2WI表现为斑片状混合高信号。这些变化在疤痕组高于非疤痕组[28.17% (60/213)vs 19.24% (76/395), p = 0.012]。然而,这些异常在没有干预的情况下自行消退。两组治疗期间及治疗后均未发生严重不良事件或并发症。结论:超声超声治疗子宫肌瘤的安全性和有效性无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书