{"title":"Efficacy and safety of ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids in patients with abdominal surgical scars on the acoustic pathway.","authors":"Junshu Li, Yong Wang, Chengqiu Qi, Changqing Pan, Jinyun Chen","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2026.2670494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation for uterine fibroids in patients with abdominal wall scars on the acoustic pathway.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 608 patients were included in the retrospective analysis. Preoperative and postoperative pelvic MRI data, treatment data, and follow-up information were collected. Patients were divided into scar group (213 cases: 172 transverse and 41 longitudinal abdominal wall scars) and non-scar group (395 cases). Treatment efficacy, adverse events, and complications were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median fibroid ablation rates were similar in the scar and non-scar groups: 87.81% (IQR 78.20-98.80%) and 87.67% (IQR 75.18-96.75%), respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.403). The incidence of skin-burning sensation during operation in the scar group was significantly higher than that in the non-scar group [15.96% (34/213) vs 8.35% (33/395), <i>p</i> = 0.004]. Postoperative abdominal wall MRT2WI signal changes occurred in 22.37% (136/608) of cases, mainly in the subcutaneous fat layer (50%, 68/136), appearing as patchy mixed high signal on MRT2WI. These changes were higher in the scar group than in the non-scar group [28.17% (60/213) vs 19.24% (76/395), <i>p</i> = 0.012]. However, these abnormalities resolved spontaneously without intervention. No serious adverse events or complications occurred in either group during or after treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abdominal wall surgical scars on the acoustic pathway do not significantly affect the safety and efficacy of USgHIFU for uterine fibroids.</p>","PeriodicalId":520653,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","volume":"43 1","pages":"2670494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2026.2670494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation for uterine fibroids in patients with abdominal wall scars on the acoustic pathway.
Methods: A total of 608 patients were included in the retrospective analysis. Preoperative and postoperative pelvic MRI data, treatment data, and follow-up information were collected. Patients were divided into scar group (213 cases: 172 transverse and 41 longitudinal abdominal wall scars) and non-scar group (395 cases). Treatment efficacy, adverse events, and complications were compared between groups.
Results: The median fibroid ablation rates were similar in the scar and non-scar groups: 87.81% (IQR 78.20-98.80%) and 87.67% (IQR 75.18-96.75%), respectively (p = 0.403). The incidence of skin-burning sensation during operation in the scar group was significantly higher than that in the non-scar group [15.96% (34/213) vs 8.35% (33/395), p = 0.004]. Postoperative abdominal wall MRT2WI signal changes occurred in 22.37% (136/608) of cases, mainly in the subcutaneous fat layer (50%, 68/136), appearing as patchy mixed high signal on MRT2WI. These changes were higher in the scar group than in the non-scar group [28.17% (60/213) vs 19.24% (76/395), p = 0.012]. However, these abnormalities resolved spontaneously without intervention. No serious adverse events or complications occurred in either group during or after treatment.
Conclusion: Abdominal wall surgical scars on the acoustic pathway do not significantly affect the safety and efficacy of USgHIFU for uterine fibroids.