Randomized comparison of lipid-containing and non-lipid-containing artificial tears on tear film dynamics over a 3-month period.

IF 1.8
Jennifer E Ding, Anisha Pradhan, Dorothy K Ma, Andrea J FazioLiu, Sarah M Chang, Andrew D Graham, Devin J Leung, Ryan S Wu, Yixiu Zhou, Tatyana Svitova, Thao N Yeh, Meng C Lin
{"title":"Randomized comparison of lipid-containing and non-lipid-containing artificial tears on tear film dynamics over a 3-month period.","authors":"Jennifer E Ding, Anisha Pradhan, Dorothy K Ma, Andrea J FazioLiu, Sarah M Chang, Andrew D Graham, Devin J Leung, Ryan S Wu, Yixiu Zhou, Tatyana Svitova, Thao N Yeh, Meng C Lin","doi":"10.1002/ovs2.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the effects of a lipid-containing artificial tear (AT) and a non-lipid-containing AT on tear film dynamics over a 3-month period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects with low lipid layer thickness were randomized to lipid-containing or non-lipid-containing ATs for 3 months. At each visit Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), LipiView, non-invasive and fluorescein tear breakup times, tear lipid layer and aqueous film recordings with EasyTear View+, and corneal staining assessment were performed. Lipid layer thickness and tear thinning rate were calculated using custom LabView programs. Mixed effects models were used to analyze relationships among variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty nine subjects completed the study. Mean EasyTear View+ lipid layer thickness with non-lipid-containing AT decreased from baseline (65.1 [61.0, 69.2] nm) to 3 months (58.0 [53.4, 62.7] nm, p = 0.012), whereas mean lipid layer thickness with the lipid-containing AT remained stable (baseline = 59.0 [53.6, 64.4] nm, 3 months = 62.4 [56.1, 68.7] nm, p = 0.30). There was a significant difference in lipid layer thickness change from baseline to 3 months between the lipid-containing (3.4 nm) and non-lipid-containing ATs (-7.1 nm, p = 0.014). Tear thinning rate with the non-lipid-containing AT was faster at 3 months (baseline = 3.01 [2.21, 3.81]%/sec, 3 months = 4.78 [3.62, 5.94]%/sec, p = 0.008), but remained stable with the lipid-containing AT (baseline = 2.84 [1.93, 3.76]%/sec, 3 months = 2.93 [2.15, 3.70]%/sec, p = 0.84). The increase in tear thinning rate from baseline was greater with the non-lipid-containing (1.77%/sec) than the lipid-containing AT (0.09%/sec, p = 0.019). Fluorescein tear breakup time with the non-lipid-containing AT remained stable at 3 months (4.70 [4.14, 5.25] sec) versus baseline (4.23 [3.48, 4.99] sec, p = 0.26), whereas fluorescein tear breakup time with the lipid-containing AT was longer at 3 months (6.33 [4.85, 7.82] sec) versus baseline (4.44 [3.66, 5.22] sec, p = 0.029). There were no significant changes in OSDI score, LipiView lipid layer thickness, non-invasive tear breakup time or corneal staining grade over the 3-month period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with lipid deficiency may benefit from lipid-containing AT over the non-lipid-containing AT to stabilize tear lipid thickness and minimize tear thinning while increasing tear breakup time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT05705518) on the date of January 20, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":520732,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry","volume":"103 7","pages":"e70084"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ovs2.70084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To study the effects of a lipid-containing artificial tear (AT) and a non-lipid-containing AT on tear film dynamics over a 3-month period.

Methods: Subjects with low lipid layer thickness were randomized to lipid-containing or non-lipid-containing ATs for 3 months. At each visit Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), LipiView, non-invasive and fluorescein tear breakup times, tear lipid layer and aqueous film recordings with EasyTear View+, and corneal staining assessment were performed. Lipid layer thickness and tear thinning rate were calculated using custom LabView programs. Mixed effects models were used to analyze relationships among variables.

Results: Thirty nine subjects completed the study. Mean EasyTear View+ lipid layer thickness with non-lipid-containing AT decreased from baseline (65.1 [61.0, 69.2] nm) to 3 months (58.0 [53.4, 62.7] nm, p = 0.012), whereas mean lipid layer thickness with the lipid-containing AT remained stable (baseline = 59.0 [53.6, 64.4] nm, 3 months = 62.4 [56.1, 68.7] nm, p = 0.30). There was a significant difference in lipid layer thickness change from baseline to 3 months between the lipid-containing (3.4 nm) and non-lipid-containing ATs (-7.1 nm, p = 0.014). Tear thinning rate with the non-lipid-containing AT was faster at 3 months (baseline = 3.01 [2.21, 3.81]%/sec, 3 months = 4.78 [3.62, 5.94]%/sec, p = 0.008), but remained stable with the lipid-containing AT (baseline = 2.84 [1.93, 3.76]%/sec, 3 months = 2.93 [2.15, 3.70]%/sec, p = 0.84). The increase in tear thinning rate from baseline was greater with the non-lipid-containing (1.77%/sec) than the lipid-containing AT (0.09%/sec, p = 0.019). Fluorescein tear breakup time with the non-lipid-containing AT remained stable at 3 months (4.70 [4.14, 5.25] sec) versus baseline (4.23 [3.48, 4.99] sec, p = 0.26), whereas fluorescein tear breakup time with the lipid-containing AT was longer at 3 months (6.33 [4.85, 7.82] sec) versus baseline (4.44 [3.66, 5.22] sec, p = 0.029). There were no significant changes in OSDI score, LipiView lipid layer thickness, non-invasive tear breakup time or corneal staining grade over the 3-month period.

Conclusions: Patients with lipid deficiency may benefit from lipid-containing AT over the non-lipid-containing AT to stabilize tear lipid thickness and minimize tear thinning while increasing tear breakup time.

Trial registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT05705518) on the date of January 20, 2023.

含脂和不含脂人工泪液在3个月期间对泪膜动态的随机比较。
目的:研究含脂人工泪(AT)和不含脂人工泪(AT)对泪膜动力学的影响,为期3个月。方法:将低脂层厚度受试者随机分为含脂和不含脂两组,为期3个月。每次就诊时进行眼表疾病指数(OSDI)、LipiView、无创泪液破裂次数和荧光素泪液破裂次数、EasyTear View+泪液脂质层和水膜记录以及角膜染色评估。使用定制的LabView程序计算脂质层厚度和撕裂稀释率。采用混合效应模型分析变量间的关系。结果:39名受试者完成了研究。非含脂AT组的平均EasyTear View+脂质层厚度从基线值(65.1 [61.0,69.2]nm)下降到3个月(58.0 [53.4,62.7]nm, p = 0.012),而含脂AT组的平均脂质层厚度保持稳定(基线值= 59.0 [53.6,64.4]nm, 3个月= 62.4 [56.1,68.7]nm, p = 0.30)。含脂at组(3.4 nm)和非含脂at组(-7.1 nm, p = 0.014)的脂质层厚度变化从基线到3个月有显著差异。非含脂AT组的撕裂变薄率在3个月时更快(基线= 3.01[2.21,3.81]%/秒,3个月= 4.78[3.62,5.94]%/秒,p = 0.008),而含脂AT组的撕裂变薄率保持稳定(基线= 2.84[1.93,3.76]%/秒,3个月= 2.93[2.15,3.70]%/秒,p = 0.84)。与基线相比,非脂质AT的撕裂变薄率增加(1.77%/秒)大于含脂AT(0.09%/秒,p = 0.019)。非含脂AT的荧光素撕裂时间在3个月时保持稳定(4.70[4.14,5.25]秒),比基线(4.23[3.48,4.99]秒,p = 0.26),而含脂AT的荧光素撕裂时间在3个月时更长(6.33[4.85,7.82]秒),比基线(4.44[3.66,5.22]秒,p = 0.029)。OSDI评分、LipiView脂质层厚度、无创撕裂时间、角膜染色分级3个月无明显变化。结论:脂质缺乏患者使用含脂AT比不含脂AT更有利于稳定泪液脂质厚度,减少泪液变薄,同时增加泪液破裂时间。试验注册:本研究于2023年1月20日在ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT05705518)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书