Omadacycline for community-acquired infections: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

IF 0.6
Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira Amador, Cainã Araújo Saraiva, Pandora Eloá Oliveira Fonseca, Sávio Benvindo Ferreira
{"title":"Omadacycline for community-acquired infections: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis","authors":"Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira Amador, Cainã Araújo Saraiva, Pandora Eloá Oliveira Fonseca, Sávio Benvindo Ferreira","doi":"10.7705/biomedica.7814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction. Community-acquired infections have a significant burden on healthcare systems and are caused by a variety of pathogens with different severities. Increasing microbial resistance complicates treatment, highlighting the need for new therapies. Omadacycline, a novel antibiotic, has broad-spectrum activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, particularly those involved in community-acquired infections.Objective. To evaluate omadacycline’s efficacy and safety for treating community-acquired infections.Materials and methods. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized and non-randomized studies about omadacycline for community-acquired infections, with no time restrictions. Primary outcomes were clinical success at the end of treatment and post-treatment evaluation. Secondary outcomes included the risk of adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Results. We analyzed data from 10 studies involving 1666 patients, addressing infections such as pneumonia, wound infections, cellulitis, major abscesses, lower extremity ulcers, erysipelas, cystitis, and bone or joint infections. The analysis showed a 90% (1138 of 1264 patients; 95% CI: 88 - 91) clinical success rate at the end of treatment and 84% (1288 of 1534 patients; 95% CI: 82 - 86) success rate at post-treatment evaluation. Adverse events occurred in 45% (747 of 1662; 95% CI: 32 - 59), with 18% [181 of 1008; 95% CI: 13 - 24] experiencing gastrointestinal issues. The mortality rate was 0% (0,8%) (13 patients; 95% CI: 0 - 1). Conclusions. Omadacycline is a promising option for treating community-acquired infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":101322,"journal":{"name":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","volume":"46 Sp. 1","pages":"47-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13496218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.7814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Community-acquired infections have a significant burden on healthcare systems and are caused by a variety of pathogens with different severities. Increasing microbial resistance complicates treatment, highlighting the need for new therapies. Omadacycline, a novel antibiotic, has broad-spectrum activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, particularly those involved in community-acquired infections.Objective. To evaluate omadacycline’s efficacy and safety for treating community-acquired infections.Materials and methods. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized and non-randomized studies about omadacycline for community-acquired infections, with no time restrictions. Primary outcomes were clinical success at the end of treatment and post-treatment evaluation. Secondary outcomes included the risk of adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Results. We analyzed data from 10 studies involving 1666 patients, addressing infections such as pneumonia, wound infections, cellulitis, major abscesses, lower extremity ulcers, erysipelas, cystitis, and bone or joint infections. The analysis showed a 90% (1138 of 1264 patients; 95% CI: 88 - 91) clinical success rate at the end of treatment and 84% (1288 of 1534 patients; 95% CI: 82 - 86) success rate at post-treatment evaluation. Adverse events occurred in 45% (747 of 1662; 95% CI: 32 - 59), with 18% [181 of 1008; 95% CI: 13 - 24] experiencing gastrointestinal issues. The mortality rate was 0% (0,8%) (13 patients; 95% CI: 0 - 1). Conclusions. Omadacycline is a promising option for treating community-acquired infections.

奥马达环素治疗社区获得性感染:一项系统综述和单组荟萃分析。
介绍。社区感染给卫生系统造成相当大的负担,是由各种病原体引起的,其严重程度各不相同。微生物耐药性的增加使治疗复杂化,这凸显了新疗法的必要性。奥马四环素是一种新型抗生素,对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性病原体具有广谱活性,特别是那些涉及社区获得性感染的病原体。目标。评估奥马四环素治疗社区获得性感染的有效性和安全性。材料和方法。我们在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane进行了无时间限制的社区获得性感染的奥马达西林随机和非随机研究。主要结果是治疗结束时的临床成功和治疗后的评估。次要结果包括不良事件的风险。使用R. Results软件进行统计分析。分析了涉及1666名患者的10项研究的数据,这些研究涉及肺炎、伤口感染、蜂窝组织炎、严重脓肿、下肢溃疡、丹毒、膀胱炎以及骨或关节感染等感染。分析显示,治疗结束时的临床成功率为90%(1264例患者1138例,95%置信区间88 - 91),治疗后的临床成功率为84%(1534例患者1288例,95%置信区间82 - 86)。45%的病例发生不良事件(1662例中的747例;95%的置信区间:32 - 59),18%的病例出现胃肠道问题(1008例中的181例;95%的置信区间:13 - 24)。死亡率为0%(0.8%)(13例;95%置信区间:0 - 1)。结论。奥马四环素是治疗社区获得性感染的一种有希望的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书