Incremental value of binary PSMA PET nodal status when added to Briganti-2019 and MSKCC models for predicting pathologic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
S Cetin, S Sozen, B Sahin, E Suer, S Yazici, G Aslan, A Bugra Senturk, L Turkeri
{"title":"Incremental value of binary PSMA PET nodal status when added to Briganti-2019 and MSKCC models for predicting pathologic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.","authors":"S Cetin, S Sozen, B Sahin, E Suer, S Yazici, G Aslan, A Bugra Senturk, L Turkeri","doi":"10.1016/j.acuroe.2026.502004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether adding PSMA PET-detected lymph node involvement to established nomograms (Briganti-2019 and MSKCC) improves prediction of pathologic lymph node metastasis(LNM) in prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective, registry-based, multi-center cohort coordinated by the Turkish Urooncology Association, with data from 10 centers. We included 301 men undergoing radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) and preoperative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. For each nomogram, we fitted a baseline model and a model with the addition of PSMA PET nodal involvement (positive/negative). Discrimination (AUC) was compared using the DeLong test; model fit with the likelihood-ratio (LR) test; clinical utility with decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For Briganti-2019, AUC numerically increased from 0.744 to 0.828 (ΔAUC +0.084; DeLong P = .342), with improved fit (Δ-2LL 12.633; P < .001). For MSKCC, AUC numerically increased from 0.813 to 0.830 (ΔAUC +0.017; DeLong P = .620), with better fit (Δ-2LL 9.306; P = .002). DCA showed a consistent net-benefit gain for Briganti-2019 with PSMA PET across 5%-20% thresholds (largest around 15%), whereas gains for MSKCC were modest and confined to higher thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding PSMA PET/CT nodal status improved model fit and suggested potential incremental clinical utility, particularly for Briganti-2019; however, statistically significant improvement in discrimination was not demonstrated by DeLong testing. PSMA PET/CT and clinical nomograms may be considered complementary tools for selecting candidates for ePLND.</p>","PeriodicalId":94291,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":" ","pages":"502004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2026.502004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether adding PSMA PET-detected lymph node involvement to established nomograms (Briganti-2019 and MSKCC) improves prediction of pathologic lymph node metastasis(LNM) in prostate cancer.
Materials and methods: Retrospective, registry-based, multi-center cohort coordinated by the Turkish Urooncology Association, with data from 10 centers. We included 301 men undergoing radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) and preoperative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. For each nomogram, we fitted a baseline model and a model with the addition of PSMA PET nodal involvement (positive/negative). Discrimination (AUC) was compared using the DeLong test; model fit with the likelihood-ratio (LR) test; clinical utility with decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results: For Briganti-2019, AUC numerically increased from 0.744 to 0.828 (ΔAUC +0.084; DeLong P = .342), with improved fit (Δ-2LL 12.633; P < .001). For MSKCC, AUC numerically increased from 0.813 to 0.830 (ΔAUC +0.017; DeLong P = .620), with better fit (Δ-2LL 9.306; P = .002). DCA showed a consistent net-benefit gain for Briganti-2019 with PSMA PET across 5%-20% thresholds (largest around 15%), whereas gains for MSKCC were modest and confined to higher thresholds.
Conclusion: Adding PSMA PET/CT nodal status improved model fit and suggested potential incremental clinical utility, particularly for Briganti-2019; however, statistically significant improvement in discrimination was not demonstrated by DeLong testing. PSMA PET/CT and clinical nomograms may be considered complementary tools for selecting candidates for ePLND.