Oncologic outcome and safety profile of first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab vs. conventional chemotherapy in advanced urothelial cancer.

Q3 Medicine
Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy Pub Date : 2026-07-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.37349/etat.2026.1002379
Makito Miyake, Nobutaka Nishimura, Yuki Oda, Takuto Shimizu, Takeshi Inoue, Satoshi Anai, Keichi Sakamoto, Yoshiaki Matsumura, Yuta Toyoshima, Daiki Ichii, Kota Iida, Takashi Iwamoto, Norimi Takamatsu, Atsushi Tomioka, Hiroaki Yamamoto, Fumisato Maesaka, Kiyohide Fujimoto
{"title":"Oncologic outcome and safety profile of first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab vs. conventional chemotherapy in advanced urothelial cancer.","authors":"Makito Miyake, Nobutaka Nishimura, Yuki Oda, Takuto Shimizu, Takeshi Inoue, Satoshi Anai, Keichi Sakamoto, Yoshiaki Matsumura, Yuta Toyoshima, Daiki Ichii, Kota Iida, Takashi Iwamoto, Norimi Takamatsu, Atsushi Tomioka, Hiroaki Yamamoto, Fumisato Maesaka, Kiyohide Fujimoto","doi":"10.37349/etat.2026.1002379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this multicenter study was to assess patient characteristics and short-term survival outcomes of first-line (1L) enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) as compared with conventional chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The database included 642 patients with la/mUC diagnosed between January 2008 and December 2025 at 12 collaborating hospitals. Baseline characteristics and follow-up data, including overall and organ-specific objective tumor response according to the RECIST v1.1, progression-free survival, and duration of response, were compared among the 1L regimens. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were graded according to the CTCAE v5.0 in patients treated with 1L EVP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The objective response and disease control rate were higher with 1L EVP than with chemotherapy (66% vs. 42% and 83% vs. 68%, respectively). The organ-specific response rate for liver metastatic lesions was 85%. Median progression-free survival (95% confidence interval) for 1L EVP, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, and gemcitabine plus carboplatin was 14.5 months (10.5-not determined), 10.5 months (8.4-13.3), and 9.2 months (6.7-14.2), respectively. In the safety analysis set including 40 patients, all-grade TRAEs occurred in 36 (90%) patients, including grade 1-2 events in 30 (75%) and grade 3-4 toxicities in 6 (15%). Grade 3-4 TRAEs included skin toxicity (7.5%), anorexia (5.0%), anemia (5.0%), gastrointestinal disorders (2.5%), renal dysfunction (2.5%), and interstitial lung disease (2.5%). The median number of administered EV cycles was 4 (range, 1-13), 5 (2-13), and 10 (4-13) in the overall, responder, and complete-response populations, respectively. EV dose modifications and interruptions were frequent in the initial 2 months but rare thereafter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multicenter study provides real-world evidence on short-term outcomes and safety with 1L EVP, highlighting its impact on the evolving treatment landscape for la/mUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":73002,"journal":{"name":"Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy","volume":"7 ","pages":"1002379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13337572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37349/etat.2026.1002379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this multicenter study was to assess patient characteristics and short-term survival outcomes of first-line (1L) enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EVP) as compared with conventional chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC).

Methods: The database included 642 patients with la/mUC diagnosed between January 2008 and December 2025 at 12 collaborating hospitals. Baseline characteristics and follow-up data, including overall and organ-specific objective tumor response according to the RECIST v1.1, progression-free survival, and duration of response, were compared among the 1L regimens. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were graded according to the CTCAE v5.0 in patients treated with 1L EVP.

Results: The objective response and disease control rate were higher with 1L EVP than with chemotherapy (66% vs. 42% and 83% vs. 68%, respectively). The organ-specific response rate for liver metastatic lesions was 85%. Median progression-free survival (95% confidence interval) for 1L EVP, gemcitabine plus cisplatin, and gemcitabine plus carboplatin was 14.5 months (10.5-not determined), 10.5 months (8.4-13.3), and 9.2 months (6.7-14.2), respectively. In the safety analysis set including 40 patients, all-grade TRAEs occurred in 36 (90%) patients, including grade 1-2 events in 30 (75%) and grade 3-4 toxicities in 6 (15%). Grade 3-4 TRAEs included skin toxicity (7.5%), anorexia (5.0%), anemia (5.0%), gastrointestinal disorders (2.5%), renal dysfunction (2.5%), and interstitial lung disease (2.5%). The median number of administered EV cycles was 4 (range, 1-13), 5 (2-13), and 10 (4-13) in the overall, responder, and complete-response populations, respectively. EV dose modifications and interruptions were frequent in the initial 2 months but rare thereafter.

Conclusions: This multicenter study provides real-world evidence on short-term outcomes and safety with 1L EVP, highlighting its impact on the evolving treatment landscape for la/mUC.

在晚期尿路上皮癌中,一线维多汀联合派姆单抗与常规化疗相比的肿瘤预后和安全性
目的:这项多中心研究的目的是评估在局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌(la/mUC)中,与常规化疗相比,一线(1L) enfortumab vedotin联合派姆单抗(pembrolizumab, EVP)的患者特征和短期生存结果。方法:数据库包括2008年1月至2025年12月在12家合作医院诊断的642例la/mUC患者。基线特征和随访数据,包括根据RECIST v1.1的总体和器官特异性客观肿瘤反应,无进展生存期和反应持续时间,在11个方案中进行比较。治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)根据CTCAE v5.0对1L EVP患者进行分级。结果:1L EVP组的客观有效率和疾病控制率均高于化疗组(分别为66%比42%和83%比68%)。肝转移病变的器官特异性反应率为85%。1L EVP、吉西他滨+顺铂和吉西他滨+卡铂的中位无进展生存期(95%置信区间)分别为14.5个月(10.5-未确定)、10.5个月(8.4-13.3)和9.2个月(6.7-14.2)。在包括40例患者的安全性分析集中,36例(90%)患者发生了全级别trae,其中30例(75%)发生了1-2级事件,6例(15%)发生了3-4级毒性。3-4级TRAEs包括皮肤毒性(7.5%)、厌食症(5.0%)、贫血(5.0%)、胃肠道疾病(2.5%)、肾功能障碍(2.5%)和间质性肺疾病(2.5%)。在总体、应答和完全应答人群中,给予EV周期的中位数分别为4(范围,1-13)、5(2-13)和10(4-13)。剂量改变和中断在最初2个月很频繁,但此后很少发生。结论:这项多中心研究为1L EVP的短期疗效和安全性提供了真实证据,突出了其对la/mUC治疗前景的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书