Medication-Related Errors Among Nurses by Unit Adaptation Levels: Bayesian Network-Based Exploratory Study.

IF 5
JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2026-07-07 DOI:10.2196/87436
Naotaka Sugimura, Katsuhiko Ogasawara
{"title":"Medication-Related Errors Among Nurses by Unit Adaptation Levels: Bayesian Network-Based Exploratory Study.","authors":"Naotaka Sugimura, Katsuhiko Ogasawara","doi":"10.2196/87436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical errors occur more frequently in health care than in other industries due to challenges in patient safety education for nurses and students. To address this, it is important to identify the factors and structures underlying clinical errors and apply these insights to educational programs. Medication-related errors are highly preventable with appropriate interventions, highlighting the importance of data-driven safety education. Previous research suggests that unit adaptation, rather than clinical experience alone, plays a critical role in error occurrence. Focusing on \"adaptive performance,\" an underexplored concept in nursing, can help identify new educational strategies and interventions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This hypothesis-generating study used Bayesian network modeling to examine how unit experience-and, secondarily, total nursing experience-relates to the structure of medication-related errors, with implications for data-driven patient safety education and nursing student instruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed methods study conducted a qualitative root cause analysis of medication error reports to identify causal factors. Bayesian network modeling, an artificial intelligence-based approach, was used to visualize error-generation flows and compare models based on years of experience within the current unit. Data were obtained from 2023 medication-related error reports submitted by nurses to the Japan Council for Quality Health Care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 119 medication-related incidents, the largest proportion occurred in internal medicine departments (n=47 cases, 39.5%), followed by surgical departments (n=27 cases, 22.7%), the intensive care unit (n=10 cases, 8.4%), and the emergency room (n=7 cases, 5.9%). Most incidents occurred in patient rooms or wards (n=97 cases, 81.5%). Root cause analysis identified 10 types of medication-related events and 23 contributing factors. Cases were categorized into low-, moderate-, and high-adaptation groups based on years of experience in the current unit. In the low-adaptation group (n=33), 69.7% of nurses had ≥5 years of total nursing experience, indicating that the group did not consist solely of novice nurses. The average entropy of incident events across the Bayesian network models ranged from 0.37 to 0.78, suggesting moderate to relatively high uncertainty in the inferred error structures. The moderate- and high-adaptation models exhibited fewer complex error networks, with weaker chains of unsafe conditions or actions than the low-adaptation model. The extensive clinical experience did not always prevent errors; rather, it was often linked to lapses in verification behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unit adaptation appears to play a critical role in shaping error pathways. Nurses with lower unit adaptation demonstrated more complex error structures, indicating higher vulnerability to incident chains. In contrast, total years of nursing experience did not uniformly reduce risk and may even relate to lapses in verification behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"9 ","pages":"e87436"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13340574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/87436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical errors occur more frequently in health care than in other industries due to challenges in patient safety education for nurses and students. To address this, it is important to identify the factors and structures underlying clinical errors and apply these insights to educational programs. Medication-related errors are highly preventable with appropriate interventions, highlighting the importance of data-driven safety education. Previous research suggests that unit adaptation, rather than clinical experience alone, plays a critical role in error occurrence. Focusing on "adaptive performance," an underexplored concept in nursing, can help identify new educational strategies and interventions.

Objective: This hypothesis-generating study used Bayesian network modeling to examine how unit experience-and, secondarily, total nursing experience-relates to the structure of medication-related errors, with implications for data-driven patient safety education and nursing student instruction.

Methods: This mixed methods study conducted a qualitative root cause analysis of medication error reports to identify causal factors. Bayesian network modeling, an artificial intelligence-based approach, was used to visualize error-generation flows and compare models based on years of experience within the current unit. Data were obtained from 2023 medication-related error reports submitted by nurses to the Japan Council for Quality Health Care.

Results: Among 119 medication-related incidents, the largest proportion occurred in internal medicine departments (n=47 cases, 39.5%), followed by surgical departments (n=27 cases, 22.7%), the intensive care unit (n=10 cases, 8.4%), and the emergency room (n=7 cases, 5.9%). Most incidents occurred in patient rooms or wards (n=97 cases, 81.5%). Root cause analysis identified 10 types of medication-related events and 23 contributing factors. Cases were categorized into low-, moderate-, and high-adaptation groups based on years of experience in the current unit. In the low-adaptation group (n=33), 69.7% of nurses had ≥5 years of total nursing experience, indicating that the group did not consist solely of novice nurses. The average entropy of incident events across the Bayesian network models ranged from 0.37 to 0.78, suggesting moderate to relatively high uncertainty in the inferred error structures. The moderate- and high-adaptation models exhibited fewer complex error networks, with weaker chains of unsafe conditions or actions than the low-adaptation model. The extensive clinical experience did not always prevent errors; rather, it was often linked to lapses in verification behavior.

Conclusions: Unit adaptation appears to play a critical role in shaping error pathways. Nurses with lower unit adaptation demonstrated more complex error structures, indicating higher vulnerability to incident chains. In contrast, total years of nursing experience did not uniformly reduce risk and may even relate to lapses in verification behaviors.

基于贝叶斯网络的护士用药相关差错单位适应水平的探索性研究
背景:由于护士和学生在患者安全教育方面面临挑战,医疗保健行业的医疗事故发生率高于其他行业。为了解决这个问题,重要的是要确定临床错误的因素和结构,并将这些见解应用到教育计划中。通过适当的干预措施,与药物有关的错误是可以高度预防的,这突出了数据驱动的安全教育的重要性。先前的研究表明,单位适应,而不是临床经验,在错误发生中起着关键作用。关注“适应性表现”,这是护理学中一个未被充分探索的概念,可以帮助确定新的教育策略和干预措施。目的:本假设生成研究使用贝叶斯网络模型来检验单位经验(其次是总体护理经验)与药物相关错误结构的关系,并对数据驱动的患者安全教育和护理学生指导具有指导意义。方法:采用混合方法对用药差错报告进行定性的根本原因分析,找出导致用药差错的原因。贝叶斯网络建模是一种基于人工智能的方法,用于可视化错误生成流程,并根据当前单元的多年经验比较模型。数据来自护士向日本优质医疗保健委员会提交的2023份与药物相关的错误报告。结果:119起药物相关事件中,发生在内科的比例最大(n=47例,占39.5%),其次是外科(n=27例,占22.7%)、重症监护病房(n=10例,占8.4%)和急诊室(n=7例,占5.9%)。大多数事故发生在病房或病房(97例,占81.5%)。根本原因分析确定了10种药物相关事件和23种促成因素。根据当前单位多年的经验,将病例分为低、中、高适应组。在低适应组(n=33)中,69.7%的护士总护理经验≥5年,表明该组并非完全由新手护士组成。贝叶斯网络模型中事件的平均熵在0.37到0.78之间,表明在推断的误差结构中存在中等到相对较高的不确定性。与低适应模型相比,中等和高适应模型的复杂误差网络较少,不安全条件或行为链较弱。丰富的临床经验并不总能预防错误;相反,它通常与核查行为的失误有关。结论:单位适应似乎在形成错误路径中起关键作用。低单位适应性的护士表现出更复杂的错误结构,表明更容易受到事件链的影响。相比之下,总护理经验并没有统一地降低风险,甚至可能与验证行为的失误有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书