A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the impact of placement instability on the mental health outcomes of care experienced children and young people

IF 4.1
JCPP advances Pub Date : 2026-09-13 Epub Date: 2026-01-31 DOI:10.1002/jcv2.70099
Rosa Sparks, Gary Kainth, Helen Minnis, Jala Rizeq
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis examining the impact of placement instability on the mental health outcomes of care experienced children and young people","authors":"Rosa Sparks,&nbsp;Gary Kainth,&nbsp;Helen Minnis,&nbsp;Jala Rizeq","doi":"10.1002/jcv2.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Care experienced children and young people (CECYP) are at risk of mental health difficulties. This review aimed to examine the impact of placement instability on the mental health outcomes of CECYP and to explore how placement instability is measured.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidance. Four databases (PsycINFO, Embase, Medline and ProQuest) were initially searched on 14<sup>th</sup> December 2023, with an updated search conducted on January 29<sup>th</sup> 2025. The following inclusion criteria were used: quantitative observational studies, CECYP (0–18 years), mental health difficulties as the outcome and placement instability as the exposure. The quality of the included studies was also assessed. The results from all papers included in the review were narratively synthesised and results from a subsample of the papers eligible for quantitative synthesis were analysed using a random effects meta-analysis to examine the association between placement instability and mental health outcomes of CECYP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-two studies were eligible for inclusion. The measurement of placement instability varied with some studies counting number of placement moves and some grouping number of moves into levels. The time frames in which moves were measured also varied. Overall, placement instability had a negative impact on mental health outcomes in CECYP, irrespective of age, sex, domain of mental health assessed (internalising and externalising), and initial levels of mental health. The meta-analysis found that placement instability had a small significant association with both internalising (<i>r =</i> 0.14, 95% CI = 0.12, 0.17) and externalising (<i>r =</i> 0.14, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.18) mental health difficulties.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Placement instability is inconsistently measured and defined in the literature. Despite this heterogeneity in operationalisation, it remains a concerning risk factor for mental health difficulties of CECYP. Efforts should be made to minimise instability for this population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>The protocol was registered on PROSPERO on the 2nd of February 2024 (CRD42024444031), can be found at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024444031.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73542,"journal":{"name":"JCPP advances","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13339400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCPP advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcv2.70099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Care experienced children and young people (CECYP) are at risk of mental health difficulties. This review aimed to examine the impact of placement instability on the mental health outcomes of CECYP and to explore how placement instability is measured.

Methods

This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidance. Four databases (PsycINFO, Embase, Medline and ProQuest) were initially searched on 14th December 2023, with an updated search conducted on January 29th 2025. The following inclusion criteria were used: quantitative observational studies, CECYP (0–18 years), mental health difficulties as the outcome and placement instability as the exposure. The quality of the included studies was also assessed. The results from all papers included in the review were narratively synthesised and results from a subsample of the papers eligible for quantitative synthesis were analysed using a random effects meta-analysis to examine the association between placement instability and mental health outcomes of CECYP.

Results

Twenty-two studies were eligible for inclusion. The measurement of placement instability varied with some studies counting number of placement moves and some grouping number of moves into levels. The time frames in which moves were measured also varied. Overall, placement instability had a negative impact on mental health outcomes in CECYP, irrespective of age, sex, domain of mental health assessed (internalising and externalising), and initial levels of mental health. The meta-analysis found that placement instability had a small significant association with both internalising (r = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.12, 0.17) and externalising (r = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.18) mental health difficulties.

Conclusion

Placement instability is inconsistently measured and defined in the literature. Despite this heterogeneity in operationalisation, it remains a concerning risk factor for mental health difficulties of CECYP. Efforts should be made to minimise instability for this population.

Trial Registration

The protocol was registered on PROSPERO on the 2nd of February 2024 (CRD42024444031), can be found at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024444031.

一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,研究安置不稳定性对经历过护理的儿童和青少年心理健康结果的影响。
背景:经历过护理的儿童和青少年(CECYP)面临心理健康困难的风险。本综述旨在研究安置不稳定性对CECYP心理健康结果的影响,并探讨如何测量安置不稳定性。方法:本综述遵循PRISMA指南进行。四个数据库(PsycINFO, Embase, Medline和ProQuest)最初于2023年12月14日进行了搜索,并于2025年1月29日进行了更新搜索。采用以下纳入标准:定量观察性研究,CECYP(0-18岁),以精神健康困难为结局,以安置不稳定性为暴露。纳入研究的质量也被评估。对纳入本综述的所有论文的结果进行叙述性综合,并对符合定量综合条件的论文子样本的结果进行随机效应荟萃分析,以检验安置不稳定性与CECYP心理健康结局之间的关系。结果:22项研究符合纳入条件。对于不稳定性的测量方法,有些研究采用了计算移动数的方法,有些研究则采用了将移动数分组的方法。测量移动的时间框架也各不相同。总体而言,安置不稳定对CECYP的心理健康结果有负面影响,无论年龄、性别、心理健康评估领域(内化和外化)和初始心理健康水平如何。荟萃分析发现,安置不稳定性与内在化(r = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.12, 0.17)和外在化(r = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.18)心理健康困难有小的显著关联。结论:文献中对置入不稳定性的测量和定义不一致。尽管在操作上存在这种异质性,但它仍然是CECYP心理健康困难的一个令人担忧的风险因素。应努力将这一人群的不稳定性降至最低。试验注册:该方案已于2024年2月2日在PROSPERO上注册(CRD42024444031),可在https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024444031上找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书