The effect of exercise on clinical pain: a systematic umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Pain Reports Pub Date : 2026-07-06 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001455
Ben Singh, Aaron Miatke, Dot Dumuid, Rachel Curtis, Kimberley Szeto, Kylie Dankiw, Emily Eglitis, Jasmine Petersen, Mason Zhou, Catherine Simpson, Lisa Matricciani, Felicity Braithwaite, Tasha Stanton, Carol Maher
{"title":"The effect of exercise on clinical pain: a systematic umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis.","authors":"Ben Singh, Aaron Miatke, Dot Dumuid, Rachel Curtis, Kimberley Szeto, Kylie Dankiw, Emily Eglitis, Jasmine Petersen, Mason Zhou, Catherine Simpson, Lisa Matricciani, Felicity Braithwaite, Tasha Stanton, Carol Maher","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exercise is recommended for managing pain, yet the consistency, magnitude, and certainty of effects across different pain conditions and exercises remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This umbrella review aimed to synthesize the best available evidence on the analgesic effects of exercise by examining systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2024. Eligible studies included systematic reviews with meta-analyses of RCTs comparing exercise to control conditions, with pain as a primary or secondary outcome. Reviews without meta-analyses, those not involving RCTs, or those primarily focused on experimentally induced or laboratory pain were excluded. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR-2. Standardized mean differences in pain were synthesized using random-effects meta-meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 157 systematic reviews comprising 2,736 RCTs and 221,279 participants were included. Exercise significantly reduced pain compared with controls (pooled standardized mean differences = -0.59; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.53; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Effects were observed across both chronic and acute pain conditions, encompassing musculoskeletal, neurological, inflammatory, and cancer populations. Aerobic, resistance, yoga, Pilates, and tai chi were effective. Greater effects were observed in lower-intensity, shorter-duration (<12 weeks) programs. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of findings, and the overall GRADE certainty was moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This umbrella review provides compelling evidence that exercise offers consistent and clinically meaningful pain relief across diverse populations and conditions. Findings support the integration of even low-intensity, short-term exercise into routine pain management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"11 4","pages":"e1455"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13340705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Exercise is recommended for managing pain, yet the consistency, magnitude, and certainty of effects across different pain conditions and exercises remain unclear.

Objectives: This umbrella review aimed to synthesize the best available evidence on the analgesic effects of exercise by examining systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: Eleven databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2024. Eligible studies included systematic reviews with meta-analyses of RCTs comparing exercise to control conditions, with pain as a primary or secondary outcome. Reviews without meta-analyses, those not involving RCTs, or those primarily focused on experimentally induced or laboratory pain were excluded. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR-2. Standardized mean differences in pain were synthesized using random-effects meta-meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Results: A total of 157 systematic reviews comprising 2,736 RCTs and 221,279 participants were included. Exercise significantly reduced pain compared with controls (pooled standardized mean differences = -0.59; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.53; P < 0.001). Effects were observed across both chronic and acute pain conditions, encompassing musculoskeletal, neurological, inflammatory, and cancer populations. Aerobic, resistance, yoga, Pilates, and tai chi were effective. Greater effects were observed in lower-intensity, shorter-duration (<12 weeks) programs. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of findings, and the overall GRADE certainty was moderate.

Conclusion: This umbrella review provides compelling evidence that exercise offers consistent and clinically meaningful pain relief across diverse populations and conditions. Findings support the integration of even low-intensity, short-term exercise into routine pain management strategies.

运动对临床疼痛的影响:一项系统综述和meta-meta分析。
导论:运动被推荐用于治疗疼痛,但不同疼痛状况和运动的一致性、强度和确定性影响尚不清楚。目的:本综述旨在通过对随机对照试验(rct)的系统评价和荟萃分析,综合现有的关于运动镇痛作用的最佳证据。方法:系统检索自建库至2024年8月的11个数据库。符合条件的研究包括比较运动和对照条件的随机对照试验的系统综述和荟萃分析,疼痛作为主要或次要结果。没有荟萃分析的综述、不涉及随机对照试验的综述、主要关注实验诱发或实验室疼痛的综述均被排除。两名审稿人独立提取数据并使用AMSTAR-2评估方法学质量。采用随机效应meta-meta分析综合疼痛的标准化平均差异。使用GRADE、亚组分析和敏感性分析评估证据的确定性。结果:共纳入157项系统评价,包括2,736项随机对照试验和221,279名受试者。与对照组相比,运动显著减轻了疼痛(合并标准化平均差异= -0.59;95% CI, -0.65至-0.53;P < 0.001)。在慢性和急性疼痛状况下,包括肌肉骨骼、神经系统、炎症和癌症人群中都观察到了效果。有氧运动、阻力运动、瑜伽、普拉提和太极都是有效的。结论:这一综述提供了令人信服的证据,证明运动在不同人群和条件下提供了一致的、临床上有意义的疼痛缓解。研究结果支持将低强度的短期运动纳入常规疼痛管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书