Propolis-xenograft scaffolds: comparing delivery methods for tibial bone regeneration in rats.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2026-07-02 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2340/biid.v13.46215
Yunia Dwi Rakhmatia, Lisda Damayanti, Rasmi Rikmasari, Nuroh Najmi, Sri Tjahajawati, Eriska Riyanti
{"title":"Propolis-xenograft scaffolds: comparing delivery methods for tibial bone regeneration in rats.","authors":"Yunia Dwi Rakhmatia, Lisda Damayanti, Rasmi Rikmasari, Nuroh Najmi, Sri Tjahajawati, Eriska Riyanti","doi":"10.2340/biid.v13.46215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alveolar bone loss after tooth extraction may compromise implant placement and often requires regenerative treatment. Propolis, a natural compound with osteogenic and anti-inflammatory properties, may enhance bone regeneration, particularly when combined with xenograft biomaterials. This study evaluated the effects of oral and topical propolis, alone and in combination with xenograft, on bone healing in a rat tibial defect model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to six groups (<i>n</i> = 10): control, oral propolis, topical propolis, xenograft, oral propolis with xenograft, and topical propolis with xenograft. Standardized tibial defects (5 × 2 × 2 mm) were created and treated accordingly. After 4 weeks, radiographic, histological, and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Outcomes included relative bone density, new bone area, and osteoblast and osteoclast counts. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative bone density increased from 19% in the control group to 81% in the topical propolis with xenograft group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). This group also showed the largest new bone area (434,196 ± 153,911 µm² vs. 89,408 ± 42,376 µm²; <i>p</i> < 0.001), higher osteoblast counts (178.4 ± 44.2 vs. 49.4 ± 15.2), and lower osteoclast counts compared with single-treatment groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Combination treatments, particularly topical propolis with xenograft, consistently yielded superior outcomes (<i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Propolis enhances bone regeneration, especially when applied topically in combination with xenograft. This approach promotes bone formation and balanced remodeling, supporting its potential for clinical application in bone regenerative therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"13 ","pages":"46215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13339890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.46215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alveolar bone loss after tooth extraction may compromise implant placement and often requires regenerative treatment. Propolis, a natural compound with osteogenic and anti-inflammatory properties, may enhance bone regeneration, particularly when combined with xenograft biomaterials. This study evaluated the effects of oral and topical propolis, alone and in combination with xenograft, on bone healing in a rat tibial defect model.

Materials and methods: Sixty male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to six groups (n = 10): control, oral propolis, topical propolis, xenograft, oral propolis with xenograft, and topical propolis with xenograft. Standardized tibial defects (5 × 2 × 2 mm) were created and treated accordingly. After 4 weeks, radiographic, histological, and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Outcomes included relative bone density, new bone area, and osteoblast and osteoclast counts. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test (p < 0.05).

Results: Relative bone density increased from 19% in the control group to 81% in the topical propolis with xenograft group (p < 0.05). This group also showed the largest new bone area (434,196 ± 153,911 µm² vs. 89,408 ± 42,376 µm²; p < 0.001), higher osteoblast counts (178.4 ± 44.2 vs. 49.4 ± 15.2), and lower osteoclast counts compared with single-treatment groups (p < 0.001). Combination treatments, particularly topical propolis with xenograft, consistently yielded superior outcomes (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Propolis enhances bone regeneration, especially when applied topically in combination with xenograft. This approach promotes bone formation and balanced remodeling, supporting its potential for clinical application in bone regenerative therapy.

蜂胶-异种移植支架:大鼠胫骨再生给药方法的比较。
背景:拔牙后牙槽骨丢失可能影响种植体的放置,通常需要再生治疗。蜂胶是一种具有成骨和抗炎特性的天然化合物,可以促进骨再生,特别是当与异种移植生物材料结合使用时。本研究评估了口服和外用蜂胶单独使用以及与异种移植物联合使用对大鼠胫骨缺损模型骨愈合的影响。材料与方法:雄性Wistar大鼠60只,随机分为6组(n = 10):对照组、口服蜂胶组、外用蜂胶组、异种蜂胶组、口服蜂胶组和外用蜂胶组。建立标准胫骨缺损(5 × 2 × 2 mm)并进行相应处理。4周后,进行影像学、组织学和组织形态学分析。结果包括相对骨密度、新骨面积、成骨细胞和破骨细胞计数。资料分析采用单因素方差分析加Tukey事后检验(p < 0.05)。结果:外用蜂胶异种移植组相对骨密度由对照组的19%提高到81% (p < 0.05)。与单一治疗组相比,该组新生骨面积最大(434,196±153,911µm²比89,408±42,376µm²,p < 0.001),成骨细胞计数较高(178.4±44.2比49.4±15.2),破骨细胞计数较低(p < 0.001)。联合治疗,特别是外用蜂胶和异种移植物,始终取得了较好的结果(p < 0.01)。结论:蜂胶能促进骨再生,特别是与异种移植联合局部应用。这种方法促进骨形成和平衡重塑,支持其在骨再生治疗中的临床应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书