Cognition-Modulated EEG Signatures and Clinical Features in Major Depressive Disorder: A Machine Learning-Based Exploratory Study.

IF 2.9 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alpha psychiatry Pub Date : 2026-06-28 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.31083/AP50791
Cheng-Ta Li, Chih-An Lai, Jia-Shyun Jeng, Chih-Ming Cheng, Ya-Mei Bai, Chung-Ping Chen
{"title":"Cognition-Modulated EEG Signatures and Clinical Features in Major Depressive Disorder: A Machine Learning-Based Exploratory Study.","authors":"Cheng-Ta Li, Chih-An Lai, Jia-Shyun Jeng, Chih-Ming Cheng, Ya-Mei Bai, Chung-Ping Chen","doi":"10.31083/AP50791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) includes heterogeneous clinical dimensions, including depressive symptom severity, treatment refractoriness, and suicidality, which are commonly assessed using subjective rating scales and retrospective clinical histories. Dysfunction of frontal and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) networks has been implicated in MDD, suggesting that electroencephalography (EEG)-based approaches combined with machine learning (ML) may help with objective characterization of clinical heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Resting-state and cognition-modulated EEG data were analyzed from 209 patients with MDD. A rostral ACC-engaging cognitive task (RECT) was used to probe frontal-ACC circuitry. Linear and non-linear EEG features extracted from frontal electrodes across multiple frequency bands were integrated with several ML classifiers to perform exploratory classification of suicidality, depressive symptom severity, and treatment refractoriness. Class imbalance in suicidality was addressed using synthetic oversampling applied to the training data only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ML models, particularly Random Forest (RF), outperformed support vector machines across all outcomes. RF achieved classification accuracies of around 83% (area under curve (AUC) = 0.83) for depression severity and 87% (AUC = 0.87) for treatment refractoriness. Suicidality categorization performance improved following data balancing. Feature importance studies found consistent patterns across outcomes, with useful predictors primarily obtained from frontal electrodes and nonlinear EEG complexity measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of cognition-engaging frontal modulation and ensemble-based ML applied to EEG data suggests the feasibility of an exploratory, unified EEG-based approach for identifying important characteristics of MDD. These findings highlight the importance of frontal network dysfunction across the severity spectrum of MDD and the need for further validation in larger and longitudinal cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":"27 3","pages":"50791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13339876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/AP50791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) includes heterogeneous clinical dimensions, including depressive symptom severity, treatment refractoriness, and suicidality, which are commonly assessed using subjective rating scales and retrospective clinical histories. Dysfunction of frontal and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) networks has been implicated in MDD, suggesting that electroencephalography (EEG)-based approaches combined with machine learning (ML) may help with objective characterization of clinical heterogeneity.

Methods: Resting-state and cognition-modulated EEG data were analyzed from 209 patients with MDD. A rostral ACC-engaging cognitive task (RECT) was used to probe frontal-ACC circuitry. Linear and non-linear EEG features extracted from frontal electrodes across multiple frequency bands were integrated with several ML classifiers to perform exploratory classification of suicidality, depressive symptom severity, and treatment refractoriness. Class imbalance in suicidality was addressed using synthetic oversampling applied to the training data only.

Results: ML models, particularly Random Forest (RF), outperformed support vector machines across all outcomes. RF achieved classification accuracies of around 83% (area under curve (AUC) = 0.83) for depression severity and 87% (AUC = 0.87) for treatment refractoriness. Suicidality categorization performance improved following data balancing. Feature importance studies found consistent patterns across outcomes, with useful predictors primarily obtained from frontal electrodes and nonlinear EEG complexity measures.

Conclusions: The combination of cognition-engaging frontal modulation and ensemble-based ML applied to EEG data suggests the feasibility of an exploratory, unified EEG-based approach for identifying important characteristics of MDD. These findings highlight the importance of frontal network dysfunction across the severity spectrum of MDD and the need for further validation in larger and longitudinal cohorts.

重度抑郁症的认知调制脑电图特征和临床特征:一项基于机器学习的探索性研究。
背景:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)包括异质性的临床维度,包括抑郁症状严重程度、治疗难治性和自杀倾向,通常使用主观评定量表和回顾性临床病史进行评估。额叶和前扣带皮层(ACC)网络的功能障碍与重度抑郁症有关,这表明基于脑电图(EEG)的方法结合机器学习(ML)可能有助于客观表征临床异质性。方法:对209例重度抑郁症患者静息状态和认知调节脑电图数据进行分析。采用吻侧acc参与的认知任务(RECT)来探测额侧acc回路。从额叶电极提取的多个频段的线性和非线性EEG特征与多个ML分类器相结合,对自杀倾向、抑郁症状严重程度和治疗难治性进行探索性分类。通过对训练数据进行综合过采样,解决了自杀行为中的类别不平衡问题。结果:机器学习模型,特别是随机森林(RF),在所有结果上都优于支持向量机。RF对抑郁症严重程度的分类准确率约为83%(曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.83),对治疗难治性的分类准确率约为87% (AUC = 0.87)。数据平衡后,自杀分类性能得到改善。特征重要性研究发现了结果的一致模式,主要从额叶电极和非线性脑电图复杂性测量中获得有用的预测因子。结论:结合认知参与额叶调制和基于集成的ML应用于脑电图数据,表明了一种探索性的、统一的基于脑电图的方法识别重度抑郁症重要特征的可行性。这些发现强调了额叶网络功能障碍在重度抑郁症严重程度范围内的重要性,需要在更大的纵向队列中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书