Clinical Utility of Positive End-expiratory Pressure-incorporated PaO2/FiO2 Ratio in Prognosticating Mortality and Severity Reclassification in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Vignesh Prabhu, Souvik Chaudhuri, Shwethapriya Rao, Pratibha Todur
{"title":"Clinical Utility of Positive End-expiratory Pressure-incorporated PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> Ratio in Prognosticating Mortality and Severity Reclassification in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Vignesh Prabhu, Souvik Chaudhuri, Shwethapriya Rao, Pratibha Todur","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-25205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> (PF) ratio is globally used for defining and classifying acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), yet it does not take ventilatory support into consideration, which is crucial in achieving oxygenation. Incorporating the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) into the PF ratio (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>*PEEP; PFP ratio) may provide a more physiologically meaningful index of disease diagnosis, severity, and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the clinical utility of the PFP ratio in prognosticating mortality and its impact on reclassification of ARDS severity as compared to the traditional PF ratio.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) was performed following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251110685). A search for relevant studies from inception to July 2025 was performed, and the studies on adults with ARDS receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and those that reported PFP ratio and mortality outcomes were included. Summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) model was used to evaluate the prognostic accuracy, while the reclassification of ARDS severity using PFP vs PF ratio was descriptively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of five studies with 4,454 patients were included for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the PFP ratio for prognosticating mortality were 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-0.67] and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.96), respectively. The area under the sROC was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.85), inferring good discriminant ability. For reclassification of ARDS severity based on PFP ratio, a total of four studies were included, and 30-71.9% of patients were reclassified, showing significant bidirectional shifts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive end-expiratory pressure incorporation to the PF ratio improves the prognostic ability and leads to meaningful reclassification of ARDS severity.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Prabhu V, Chaudhuri S, Rao S, Todur P. Clinical Utility of Positive End-expiratory Pressure-incorporated PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> Ratio in Prognosticating Mortality and Severity Reclassification in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2026;30(5):420-429.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"30 5","pages":"420-429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13337781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-25205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: PaO2/FiO2 (PF) ratio is globally used for defining and classifying acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), yet it does not take ventilatory support into consideration, which is crucial in achieving oxygenation. Incorporating the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) into the PF ratio (PaO2/FiO2*PEEP; PFP ratio) may provide a more physiologically meaningful index of disease diagnosis, severity, and prognosis.

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical utility of the PFP ratio in prognosticating mortality and its impact on reclassification of ARDS severity as compared to the traditional PF ratio.

Materials and methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) was performed following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251110685). A search for relevant studies from inception to July 2025 was performed, and the studies on adults with ARDS receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and those that reported PFP ratio and mortality outcomes were included. Summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) model was used to evaluate the prognostic accuracy, while the reclassification of ARDS severity using PFP vs PF ratio was descriptively analyzed.

Results: A total of five studies with 4,454 patients were included for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the PFP ratio for prognosticating mortality were 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-0.67] and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.96), respectively. The area under the sROC was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.85), inferring good discriminant ability. For reclassification of ARDS severity based on PFP ratio, a total of four studies were included, and 30-71.9% of patients were reclassified, showing significant bidirectional shifts.

Conclusion: Positive end-expiratory pressure incorporation to the PF ratio improves the prognostic ability and leads to meaningful reclassification of ARDS severity.

How to cite this article: Prabhu V, Chaudhuri S, Rao S, Todur P. Clinical Utility of Positive End-expiratory Pressure-incorporated PaO2/FiO2 Ratio in Prognosticating Mortality and Severity Reclassification in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2026;30(5):420-429.

呼气末正压合并PaO2/FiO2比值在预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征死亡率和严重程度重分类中的临床应用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
简介:PaO2/FiO2 (PF)比率在全球范围内用于急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的定义和分类,但未考虑通气支持,而通气支持对实现氧合至关重要。将呼气末正压(PEEP)与PF比值(PaO2/FiO2*PEEP; PFP比值)相结合,可提供更有生理意义的疾病诊断、严重程度和预后指标。目的:评价PFP比值在预测死亡率方面的临床应用,以及与传统的PFP比值相比,PFP比值对ARDS严重程度重分类的影响。材料和方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析(SRMA)遵循PRISMA指南进行,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251110685)。我们检索了从成立到2025年7月的相关研究,纳入了接受有创机械通气(IMV)的成人ARDS患者的研究以及报告PFP比率和死亡率结果的研究。采用总受试者工作特征(sROC)模型评价预后准确性,描述性分析PFP / PF比值对ARDS严重程度的再分类。结果:共纳入5项研究,4454例患者进行meta分析。PFP比值预测死亡率的综合敏感性和特异性分别为0.55[95%可信区间(CI): 0.41-0.67]和0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.96)。sROC下面积为0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.85),说明其判别能力较好。基于PFP比率对ARDS严重程度进行重分,共纳入4项研究,重分率为30-71.9%,呈现明显的双向变化。结论:呼气末正压与PF比值结合可提高预后能力,对ARDS严重程度进行有意义的重新分类。Prabhu V, Chaudhuri S, Rao S, Todur P.呼气末正压合并PaO2/FiO2比值在急性呼吸窘迫综合征预后死亡率和严重程度重分类中的临床应用:系统综述和meta分析。中华危重医学杂志,2016;30(5):420-429。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书