Validation of the Chinese version of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-ELD14 for assessing quality of life in elderly cancer patients.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Lin Yue, Ruijuan Si, Ying Wang, Rong Sun, Qiong Wu, Haiyan Wang
{"title":"Validation of the Chinese version of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-ELD14 for assessing quality of life in elderly cancer patients.","authors":"Lin Yue, Ruijuan Si, Ying Wang, Rong Sun, Qiong Wu, Haiyan Wang","doi":"10.1017/S1478951526102971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To translate the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-ELD14 (EORTC QLQ-ELD14) into Chinese and validate its effectiveness in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Chinese version was developed through a rigorous translation and back-translation process based on the Brislin model, followed by cross-cultural adaptation through expert consultation. A total of 260 elderly cancer patients from a tertiary hospital in Tianjin were recruited between June 2024 and February 2025 to evaluate the instrument's reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 248 completed responses, the Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 demonstrated robust psychometric properties. The questionnaire comprises 7 dimensions (14 items), with item-level content validity indices ranging from 0.800 to 1.000 and a scale-level content validity index of 0.980. Exploratory factor analysis identified 7 underlying factors, accounting for 82.913% of the cumulative variance. Internal consistency was excellent, with a Cronbach's <i>α</i> of 0.958 for the total scale and dimension alphas exceeding 0.800. Test-retest reliability was 0.849 for the total scale and ranged from 0.813 to 0.856 across dimension.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 has good reliability and validity, which is suitable for evaluating the quality of life of elderly cancer patients within Chinese cultural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"24 ","pages":"e192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13370300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951526102971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To translate the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-ELD14 (EORTC QLQ-ELD14) into Chinese and validate its effectiveness in China.

Methods: The Chinese version was developed through a rigorous translation and back-translation process based on the Brislin model, followed by cross-cultural adaptation through expert consultation. A total of 260 elderly cancer patients from a tertiary hospital in Tianjin were recruited between June 2024 and February 2025 to evaluate the instrument's reliability and validity.

Results: Among the 248 completed responses, the Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 demonstrated robust psychometric properties. The questionnaire comprises 7 dimensions (14 items), with item-level content validity indices ranging from 0.800 to 1.000 and a scale-level content validity index of 0.980. Exploratory factor analysis identified 7 underlying factors, accounting for 82.913% of the cumulative variance. Internal consistency was excellent, with a Cronbach's α of 0.958 for the total scale and dimension alphas exceeding 0.800. Test-retest reliability was 0.849 for the total scale and ranged from 0.813 to 0.856 across dimension.

Significance of results: The Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 has good reliability and validity, which is suitable for evaluating the quality of life of elderly cancer patients within Chinese cultural contexts.

EORTC生活质量问卷- eld14中文版用于评估老年癌症患者生活质量的验证。
目的:将欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷eld14 (EORTC QLQ-ELD14)翻译成中文并验证其在中国的有效性。方法:根据布里斯林模型,经过严格的翻译和反翻译过程,并通过专家咨询进行跨文化改编。本研究于2024年6月至2025年2月在天津市某三级医院招募260例老年肿瘤患者,对该量表进行信度和效度评估。结果:在248份已完成的问卷中,中文版的EORTC QLQ-ELD14表现出较强的心理测量特性。问卷包括7个维度(14个项目),项目层面的内容效度指数为0.800 ~ 1.000,量表层面的内容效度指数为0.980。探索性因子分析确定了7个潜在因素,占累积方差的82.913%。总体量表的Cronbach’s α为0.958,维度α大于0.800,内部一致性较好。总量表的重测信度为0.849,各维度的信度在0.813 ~ 0.856之间。结果的意义:中文版的EORTC QLQ-ELD14具有良好的信度和效度,适用于中国文化背景下老年癌症患者的生活质量评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书