Patient perceptions of barriers and facilitators for self-care in surgical fast-track programmes related to capability, opportunity and motivation: a theory-based qualitative study in Sweden.

IF 2.1 Q2 NURSING
Pär Wennberg, Kerstin Eriksson, Margit Neher, Anders Broström, Anna Granath, Lotta Wikström
{"title":"Patient perceptions of barriers and facilitators for self-care in surgical fast-track programmes related to capability, opportunity and motivation: a theory-based qualitative study in Sweden.","authors":"Pär Wennberg, Kerstin Eriksson, Margit Neher, Anders Broström, Anna Granath, Lotta Wikström","doi":"10.1177/17449871261456609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical care increasingly shifts pre- and postoperative care responsibility to patient self-care at home. By using the capability, opportunity, motivation-behaviour (COM-B) framework, patient determinants influencing self-care can be explained.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to describe patients' experienced facilitators of and barriers to self-care in surgical fast-track programmes related to capability, opportunity and motivation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative design study with semi-structured interviews was conducted among 27 general and orthopaedic surgery patients at three Swedish hospitals. Data were analysed deductively using the COM-B framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients' self-care experiences were explained by capability, opportunity and motivation and the dynamic interaction between these factors. A key analytical finding was the pivotal role of family and friends, whose emotional and practical support strengthened patients' capability and motivation. Facilitators for behaviour change included prior surgical experience, clear information, physical ability, social and professional support, optimism and realistic goals. Barriers included cognitive and physical limitations, pain, fatigue and emotional distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight family involvement as an underused resource and support policy development of person centred pre- and postoperative self-care strategies. This study advances nursing theory by applying the COM-B model to illuminate interdependent behavioural processes in surgical self-care; themes could occasionally overlap.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871261456609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13337552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871261456609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical care increasingly shifts pre- and postoperative care responsibility to patient self-care at home. By using the capability, opportunity, motivation-behaviour (COM-B) framework, patient determinants influencing self-care can be explained.

Aim: The aim was to describe patients' experienced facilitators of and barriers to self-care in surgical fast-track programmes related to capability, opportunity and motivation.

Methods: A qualitative design study with semi-structured interviews was conducted among 27 general and orthopaedic surgery patients at three Swedish hospitals. Data were analysed deductively using the COM-B framework.

Results: The patients' self-care experiences were explained by capability, opportunity and motivation and the dynamic interaction between these factors. A key analytical finding was the pivotal role of family and friends, whose emotional and practical support strengthened patients' capability and motivation. Facilitators for behaviour change included prior surgical experience, clear information, physical ability, social and professional support, optimism and realistic goals. Barriers included cognitive and physical limitations, pain, fatigue and emotional distress.

Conclusions: Findings highlight family involvement as an underused resource and support policy development of person centred pre- and postoperative self-care strategies. This study advances nursing theory by applying the COM-B model to illuminate interdependent behavioural processes in surgical self-care; themes could occasionally overlap.

患者对外科快速通道项目中自我护理障碍和促进因素的认知与能力、机会和动机相关:瑞典一项基于理论的定性研究。
背景:外科护理越来越多地将术前和术后护理责任转移到患者在家自我护理。通过使用能力,机会,动机-行为(COM-B)框架,可以解释影响自我保健的患者决定因素。目的:目的是描述患者经验丰富的辅助和障碍,自我护理在外科快速通道方案相关的能力,机会和动机。方法:采用半结构化访谈的定性设计研究,对瑞典三家医院的27例普通外科和骨科患者进行调查。使用COM-B框架对数据进行演绎分析。结果:患者的自我护理体验可由能力、机会和动机三个因素解释,且三者之间存在动态交互作用。一个关键的分析发现是家庭和朋友的关键作用,他们的情感和实际支持增强了患者的能力和动力。行为改变的促进因素包括先前的手术经验、清晰的信息、身体能力、社会和专业支持、乐观和现实的目标。障碍包括认知和身体限制、疼痛、疲劳和情绪困扰。结论:研究结果强调家庭参与是一种未充分利用的资源,并支持以人为中心的术前和术后自我护理策略的政策制定。本研究通过应用COM-B模型来阐明手术自我护理中的相互依赖行为过程,从而促进护理理论的发展;主题偶尔会重叠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书