Medicines governance and systemic constraints: A qualitative study among healthcare professionals in South Africa.

IF 1.7 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Miriam M Ndwandwe, Mygirl P Lowane, Thembi V Simbeni, Mathildah M Mokgatle
{"title":"Medicines governance and systemic constraints: A qualitative study among healthcare professionals in South Africa.","authors":"Miriam M Ndwandwe, Mygirl P Lowane, Thembi V Simbeni, Mathildah M Mokgatle","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v18i1.5356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Medicine shortages and governance failures in low- and middle-income countries continue to hinder progress towards universal health coverage.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong> To explore healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences of medicines governance in South African healthcare facilities.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong> The study was conducted at the public healthcare sectors in Eastern Cape province, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A qualitative exploratory cross-sectional design was used. Twenty healthcare professionals were purposively selected. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke's framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Four major themes emerged: systemic governance constraints; pharmaceutical supply chain vulnerabilities; weak accountability mechanisms; and gaps in protocol implementation. Key determinants of medicine shortages included weak budget governance, supplier payment delays, limited pharmacy support staff and inconsistent implementation of standard treatment guidelines (STG) and limited functionality of Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees (PTCs).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Medicine shortages result from systemic governance failures rather than isolated logistical issues. Strengthening pharmaceutical governance requires transparent budgeting, timely supplier payment systems, functional PTCs, and STG training to improve equitable access to essential medicines.Contribution: This study deepens the understanding of pharmaceutical governance, revealing systemic, interrelated factors that collectively lead to the shortage of pharmaceuticals in South Africa. Unlike previous research that focused primarily on supply chain logistics, the study showed that stock-outs were rooted not simply in operational inefficiency, but also in structural governance weaknesses. This study presents practical insights to strengthen pharmaceutical governance and supports national efforts to achieve universal health coverage by identifying specific governance obstacles and proposing system-level reforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"e1-e10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13347692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v18i1.5356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Medicine shortages and governance failures in low- and middle-income countries continue to hinder progress towards universal health coverage.

Aim:  To explore healthcare professionals' perceptions and experiences of medicines governance in South African healthcare facilities.

Setting:  The study was conducted at the public healthcare sectors in Eastern Cape province, South Africa.

Methods:  A qualitative exploratory cross-sectional design was used. Twenty healthcare professionals were purposively selected. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke's framework.

Results:  Four major themes emerged: systemic governance constraints; pharmaceutical supply chain vulnerabilities; weak accountability mechanisms; and gaps in protocol implementation. Key determinants of medicine shortages included weak budget governance, supplier payment delays, limited pharmacy support staff and inconsistent implementation of standard treatment guidelines (STG) and limited functionality of Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees (PTCs).

Conclusion:  Medicine shortages result from systemic governance failures rather than isolated logistical issues. Strengthening pharmaceutical governance requires transparent budgeting, timely supplier payment systems, functional PTCs, and STG training to improve equitable access to essential medicines.Contribution: This study deepens the understanding of pharmaceutical governance, revealing systemic, interrelated factors that collectively lead to the shortage of pharmaceuticals in South Africa. Unlike previous research that focused primarily on supply chain logistics, the study showed that stock-outs were rooted not simply in operational inefficiency, but also in structural governance weaknesses. This study presents practical insights to strengthen pharmaceutical governance and supports national efforts to achieve universal health coverage by identifying specific governance obstacles and proposing system-level reforms.

药物治理和系统约束:南非医疗保健专业人员的定性研究。
背景:低收入和中等收入国家的药品短缺和治理失败继续阻碍实现全民健康覆盖的进展。目的:探讨卫生保健专业人员的看法和经验的药物治理在南非的卫生保健设施。环境:本研究在南非东开普省的公共卫生保健部门进行。方法:采用定性探索性横断面设计。有目的地选择了20名医疗保健专业人员。进行了半结构化访谈,录音,逐字转录,并使用Braun和Clarke的框架进行主题分析。结果:出现了四大主题:系统性治理约束;医药供应链脆弱性;问责机制薄弱;以及协议执行方面的差距。药品短缺的关键决定因素包括预算治理薄弱、供应商付款延迟、药房支持人员有限、标准治疗指南(STG)的实施不一致以及药学和治疗委员会(ptc)的功能有限。结论:药品短缺是系统治理失败的结果,而不是孤立的后勤问题。加强药品治理需要透明的预算编制、及时的供应商支付系统、有效的药品预付费中心和STG培训,以改善基本药物的公平获取。贡献:本研究加深了对药品治理的理解,揭示了导致南非药品短缺的系统性、相互关联的因素。与以往主要关注供应链物流的研究不同,这项研究表明,缺货不仅源于运营效率低下,还源于结构性治理薄弱。本研究提出了加强药品治理的实际见解,并通过确定具体的治理障碍和提出系统层面的改革建议,支持国家实现全民健康覆盖的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书