Telehealth-Based Ketogenic Metabolic Therapy With Lifestyle Interventions for Post-viral Illness: A Research Brief of Patients' Experiences.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2026-07-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735261459218
Dana Dharmakaya Colgan, Diane D Stadler, Tabitha Grow, Mary Ruddick, Thomas Weimbs, Todd E Davenport, Heather Zwickey
{"title":"Telehealth-Based Ketogenic Metabolic Therapy With Lifestyle Interventions for Post-viral Illness: A Research Brief of Patients' Experiences.","authors":"Dana Dharmakaya Colgan, Diane D Stadler, Tabitha Grow, Mary Ruddick, Thomas Weimbs, Todd E Davenport, Heather Zwickey","doi":"10.1177/23743735261459218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Infection-associated chronic illnesses are associated with substantial functional impairment that limits participation in traditional in-person research. A fully remote, multicomponent intervention that combines ketogenic metabolic therapy (KMT) with behavioral interventions targets several proposed biological mechanisms underlying these conditions. This study aimed to characterize patient-reported experiences with a fully remote intervention that integrated KMT and thiamine supplementation with behavioral strategies, including circadian entrainment and mindfulness-based resilience coaching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, quantitative data were collected via online REDCap surveys. Feasibility and acceptability benchmarks included perceived treatment suitability, relevance, safety, and reported treatment adherence. Optimization items evaluated preferred program duration, dosing, and structure, as well as components that respondents identified as most important for future refinement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among an international sample (<i>n</i>=41), all feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were met: 96% reported the intervention was helpful, 96% recommended it, and 75% felt \"<i>a lot better</i>\" after completion. Respondents provided patient-centered perspectives to optimize the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating patient perspectives is essential for guiding the development of safe, acceptable, and effective treatment strategies for infection-associated chronic illness, including Long COVID. Strong indicators of feasibility, acceptability, and perceived benefits support the rationale for larger controlled trials to investigate clinical efficacy and the underlying mechanistic pathways of multicomponent metabolic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"13 ","pages":"23743735261459218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13338534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735261459218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Infection-associated chronic illnesses are associated with substantial functional impairment that limits participation in traditional in-person research. A fully remote, multicomponent intervention that combines ketogenic metabolic therapy (KMT) with behavioral interventions targets several proposed biological mechanisms underlying these conditions. This study aimed to characterize patient-reported experiences with a fully remote intervention that integrated KMT and thiamine supplementation with behavioral strategies, including circadian entrainment and mindfulness-based resilience coaching.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, quantitative data were collected via online REDCap surveys. Feasibility and acceptability benchmarks included perceived treatment suitability, relevance, safety, and reported treatment adherence. Optimization items evaluated preferred program duration, dosing, and structure, as well as components that respondents identified as most important for future refinement.

Results: Among an international sample (n=41), all feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were met: 96% reported the intervention was helpful, 96% recommended it, and 75% felt "a lot better" after completion. Respondents provided patient-centered perspectives to optimize the intervention.

Conclusions: Incorporating patient perspectives is essential for guiding the development of safe, acceptable, and effective treatment strategies for infection-associated chronic illness, including Long COVID. Strong indicators of feasibility, acceptability, and perceived benefits support the rationale for larger controlled trials to investigate clinical efficacy and the underlying mechanistic pathways of multicomponent metabolic interventions.

远程医疗为基础的生酮代谢治疗与生活方式干预病毒后疾病:患者经验的研究简报。
背景/目的:感染相关的慢性疾病与严重的功能损害相关,这限制了传统的面对面研究的参与。一种将生酮代谢疗法(KMT)与行为干预相结合的远程多组分干预针对这些疾病背后的几种生物学机制。本研究旨在通过将KMT和硫胺素补充剂与行为策略(包括昼夜节律干扰和基于正念的恢复力训练)相结合的完全远程干预来描述患者报告的经历。方法:在本横断面研究中,通过在线REDCap调查收集定量数据。可行性和可接受性基准包括感知治疗的适用性、相关性、安全性和报告的治疗依从性。优化项目评估了首选的程序持续时间、剂量和结构,以及受访者认为对未来改进最重要的组件。结果:在国际样本(n=41)中,所有的可行性和可接受性基准均得到满足:96%的人报告干预是有帮助的,96%的人推荐干预,75%的人在完成干预后感觉“好多了”。受访者提供以患者为中心的观点来优化干预。结论:纳入患者观点对于指导制定安全、可接受和有效的感染相关慢性疾病(包括长冠肺炎)治疗策略至关重要。可行性、可接受性和可感知的益处强有力的指标支持了大规模对照试验的基本原理,以研究多组分代谢干预的临床疗效和潜在的机制途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书