{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT-5 in evaluating root canal treatment and periapical pathosis on periapical radiographs.","authors":"Waleed Almutairi, Mujahid Alnasser, Hanan Alharbi, Obadah Austah","doi":"10.5395/rde.2026.51.e29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots such as ChatGPT-5 (OpenAI) are increasingly used for dental radiograph interpretation, especially among patients seeking self-assessment. However, their diagnostic accuracy in endodontics remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional STARD-AI-compliant study analyzed 271 anonymized periapical radiographs of endodontically treated posterior teeth, classified as straightforward (n = 167) or complex (n = 104), using standardized ChatGPT-5 prompts. Diagnostic criteria included obturation length (short, adequate, long), presence of voids, and periapical pathosis. Results were compared to those of a panel of general dentists and a reference standard from endodontic specialists. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated using the McNemar test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT-5 demonstrated high specificity (up to 99.3%) for normal or adequately treated findings but low sensitivity for short (13.7%) or long (0.0%) obturations, voids (9.0%-22.7%), and periapical lesions (10.5%-28.6%). Overall accuracy (54.0%-63.2%) was significantly lower than that of general dentists (76.0%-85.6%) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although ChatGPT-5 achieved high specificity, its low sensitivity and overall accuracy limit diagnostic reliability. Expert clinician oversight remains essential for accurate interpretation and treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":" ","pages":"e29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13575415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2026.51.e29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots such as ChatGPT-5 (OpenAI) are increasingly used for dental radiograph interpretation, especially among patients seeking self-assessment. However, their diagnostic accuracy in endodontics remains unclear.
Methods: This cross-sectional STARD-AI-compliant study analyzed 271 anonymized periapical radiographs of endodontically treated posterior teeth, classified as straightforward (n = 167) or complex (n = 104), using standardized ChatGPT-5 prompts. Diagnostic criteria included obturation length (short, adequate, long), presence of voids, and periapical pathosis. Results were compared to those of a panel of general dentists and a reference standard from endodontic specialists. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated using the McNemar test (p < 0.05).
Results: ChatGPT-5 demonstrated high specificity (up to 99.3%) for normal or adequately treated findings but low sensitivity for short (13.7%) or long (0.0%) obturations, voids (9.0%-22.7%), and periapical lesions (10.5%-28.6%). Overall accuracy (54.0%-63.2%) was significantly lower than that of general dentists (76.0%-85.6%) (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Although ChatGPT-5 achieved high specificity, its low sensitivity and overall accuracy limit diagnostic reliability. Expert clinician oversight remains essential for accurate interpretation and treatment planning.