Diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT-5 in evaluating root canal treatment and periapical pathosis on periapical radiographs.

IF 2.9
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-08 DOI:10.5395/rde.2026.51.e29
Waleed Almutairi, Mujahid Alnasser, Hanan Alharbi, Obadah Austah
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT-5 in evaluating root canal treatment and periapical pathosis on periapical radiographs.","authors":"Waleed Almutairi, Mujahid Alnasser, Hanan Alharbi, Obadah Austah","doi":"10.5395/rde.2026.51.e29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots such as ChatGPT-5 (OpenAI) are increasingly used for dental radiograph interpretation, especially among patients seeking self-assessment. However, their diagnostic accuracy in endodontics remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional STARD-AI-compliant study analyzed 271 anonymized periapical radiographs of endodontically treated posterior teeth, classified as straightforward (n = 167) or complex (n = 104), using standardized ChatGPT-5 prompts. Diagnostic criteria included obturation length (short, adequate, long), presence of voids, and periapical pathosis. Results were compared to those of a panel of general dentists and a reference standard from endodontic specialists. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated using the McNemar test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT-5 demonstrated high specificity (up to 99.3%) for normal or adequately treated findings but low sensitivity for short (13.7%) or long (0.0%) obturations, voids (9.0%-22.7%), and periapical lesions (10.5%-28.6%). Overall accuracy (54.0%-63.2%) was significantly lower than that of general dentists (76.0%-85.6%) (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although ChatGPT-5 achieved high specificity, its low sensitivity and overall accuracy limit diagnostic reliability. Expert clinician oversight remains essential for accurate interpretation and treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":" ","pages":"e29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13575415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2026.51.e29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots such as ChatGPT-5 (OpenAI) are increasingly used for dental radiograph interpretation, especially among patients seeking self-assessment. However, their diagnostic accuracy in endodontics remains unclear.

Methods: This cross-sectional STARD-AI-compliant study analyzed 271 anonymized periapical radiographs of endodontically treated posterior teeth, classified as straightforward (n = 167) or complex (n = 104), using standardized ChatGPT-5 prompts. Diagnostic criteria included obturation length (short, adequate, long), presence of voids, and periapical pathosis. Results were compared to those of a panel of general dentists and a reference standard from endodontic specialists. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated using the McNemar test (p < 0.05).

Results: ChatGPT-5 demonstrated high specificity (up to 99.3%) for normal or adequately treated findings but low sensitivity for short (13.7%) or long (0.0%) obturations, voids (9.0%-22.7%), and periapical lesions (10.5%-28.6%). Overall accuracy (54.0%-63.2%) was significantly lower than that of general dentists (76.0%-85.6%) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Although ChatGPT-5 achieved high specificity, its low sensitivity and overall accuracy limit diagnostic reliability. Expert clinician oversight remains essential for accurate interpretation and treatment planning.

ChatGPT-5在评估根管治疗和根尖周x线片上的诊断准确性。
人工智能(AI)聊天机器人,如ChatGPT-5 (OpenAI)越来越多地用于牙科x线片解释,特别是在寻求自我评估的患者中。然而,它们在牙髓学中的诊断准确性尚不清楚。方法:本研究采用标准化的ChatGPT-5提示,分析了271张经根管治疗后牙的匿名根尖周x线片,分为简单型(n = 167)和复杂型(n = 104)。诊断标准包括封闭长度(短,足够,长),有无空隙和根尖周围病变。结果与普通牙医小组和牙髓专家的参考标准进行了比较。采用McNemar检验计算敏感性、特异性和准确性(p < 0.05)。结果:ChatGPT-5对正常或充分治疗的结果显示出高特异性(高达99.3%),但对短期(13.7%)或长期(0.0%)闭孔、空洞(9.0%-22.7%)和根尖周病变(10.5%-28.6%)的敏感性较低。总体准确率(54.0% ~ 63.2%)显著低于普通牙医(76.0% ~ 85.6%)(p < 0.001)。结论:虽然ChatGPT-5具有较高的特异性,但其较低的敏感性和总体准确性限制了诊断的可靠性。专家临床医生的监督对于准确的解释和治疗计划仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书