Using the Personality Assessment Inventory to Measure Antagonism and Disinhibition Domains: Associations with Psychiatric History and Externalizing Life Events in a Forensic Sample.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lindsay L Livengood, Matthew T Huss, Jared R Ruchensky
{"title":"Using the Personality Assessment Inventory to Measure Antagonism and Disinhibition Domains: Associations with Psychiatric History and Externalizing Life Events in a Forensic Sample.","authors":"Lindsay L Livengood, Matthew T Huss, Jared R Ruchensky","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2026.2696831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Alternative Model for Personality Disorder is an emerging personality pathology model that includes dimensional personality impairment and traits. Although there is substantial research on this model, there is limited work on the psychometric properties of the corresponding measures in criminal-legal samples. The purpose of the present study was to validate the Personality Assessment Inventory's Antagonism and Disinhibition domain and facet scores in a sample (<i>n</i> = 141) from routine private practice forensic interviews. A series of correlations were computed to assess the relationship between externalizing behaviors and psychiatric history associated with PAI AMPD scores, including substance use and criminal record. Results were generally in line with expectations. The PAI Irresponsibility facet was positively associated with the number of illegal substances used and the total number of charges. The strength and direction of correlations were consistent across the original Antisocial Features scores and this rescoring approach. These results provide evidence of convergent validity for these scores but indicate they do not offer a statistical advantage in predicting these correlations over the standard PAI Antisocial Features scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2026.2696831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Alternative Model for Personality Disorder is an emerging personality pathology model that includes dimensional personality impairment and traits. Although there is substantial research on this model, there is limited work on the psychometric properties of the corresponding measures in criminal-legal samples. The purpose of the present study was to validate the Personality Assessment Inventory's Antagonism and Disinhibition domain and facet scores in a sample (n = 141) from routine private practice forensic interviews. A series of correlations were computed to assess the relationship between externalizing behaviors and psychiatric history associated with PAI AMPD scores, including substance use and criminal record. Results were generally in line with expectations. The PAI Irresponsibility facet was positively associated with the number of illegal substances used and the total number of charges. The strength and direction of correlations were consistent across the original Antisocial Features scores and this rescoring approach. These results provide evidence of convergent validity for these scores but indicate they do not offer a statistical advantage in predicting these correlations over the standard PAI Antisocial Features scores.

使用人格评估量表测量对抗和解除抑制域:与精神病史和外化生活事件在法医样本中的关联。
人格障碍的替代模型是一种新兴的人格病理学模型,包括维度人格损伤和特征。尽管对该模型进行了大量的研究,但对刑事-法律样本中相应措施的心理测量特性的研究有限。本研究的目的是在常规私人执业法医访谈样本(n = 141)中验证人格评估量表的对抗和解除抑制域和facet得分。计算了一系列的相关性来评估外化行为和与PAI AMPD评分相关的精神病史之间的关系,包括物质使用和犯罪记录。结果大体上符合预期。PAI不负责任方面与使用的非法物质数量和收费总数呈正相关。相关的强度和方向在原始的反社会特征得分和这种评分方法中是一致的。这些结果为这些分数提供了收敛效度的证据,但表明它们在预测这些与标准PAI反社会特征分数的相关性方面没有统计学优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书