{"title":"Four different fixation strategies for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: a finite element analysis.","authors":"Yuan Liu, Xiang Zhang, Aïcha Noura Yélèen Traoré, Sujan Shakya, Guichen Liang, Yi Li, Xin Duan","doi":"10.1186/s13018-026-07040-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures are complex injuries that result from high-energy trauma. Despite the availability of multiple fixation strategies, optimal surgical management remains a subject of ongoing debate and comparative biomechanical data are lacking. This study evaluated the stability of four commonly used constructs for internal fixation using patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) to provide a robust biomechanical rationale for surgical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient-specific FEA models were reconstructed using computed tomography imaging data of eight patients to simulate a complex injury pattern involving an ipsilateral Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture combined with a comminuted femoral shaft fracture. Four distinct internal fixation strategies were evaluated: proximal femoral nail antirotation, compression plate with cannulated screws, antegrade intramedullary nail with cannulated screws (AN-CS), and long proximal femoral locking plate. Stability parameters were quantified under simulated axial and torsional loading conditions to assess the mechanical performance of each construct.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under both loading conditions, the AN-CS group consistently maintained low levels of femoral and implant displacement while demonstrating a more uniform stress distribution and minimum interfragmentary motion at the femoral neck fracture site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Of the four fixation methods evaluated in this simulation study, the AN-CS construct exhibited the best biomechanical performance overall. The AN-CS fixation effectively balanced interfragmentary stability with a uniform stress distribution, thereby providing a biomechanical basis to guide subsequent clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13625483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07040-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures are complex injuries that result from high-energy trauma. Despite the availability of multiple fixation strategies, optimal surgical management remains a subject of ongoing debate and comparative biomechanical data are lacking. This study evaluated the stability of four commonly used constructs for internal fixation using patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) to provide a robust biomechanical rationale for surgical decision-making.
Methods: Patient-specific FEA models were reconstructed using computed tomography imaging data of eight patients to simulate a complex injury pattern involving an ipsilateral Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture combined with a comminuted femoral shaft fracture. Four distinct internal fixation strategies were evaluated: proximal femoral nail antirotation, compression plate with cannulated screws, antegrade intramedullary nail with cannulated screws (AN-CS), and long proximal femoral locking plate. Stability parameters were quantified under simulated axial and torsional loading conditions to assess the mechanical performance of each construct.
Results: Under both loading conditions, the AN-CS group consistently maintained low levels of femoral and implant displacement while demonstrating a more uniform stress distribution and minimum interfragmentary motion at the femoral neck fracture site.
Conclusion: Of the four fixation methods evaluated in this simulation study, the AN-CS construct exhibited the best biomechanical performance overall. The AN-CS fixation effectively balanced interfragmentary stability with a uniform stress distribution, thereby providing a biomechanical basis to guide subsequent clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.