Four different fixation strategies for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: a finite element analysis.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Yuan Liu, Xiang Zhang, Aïcha Noura Yélèen Traoré, Sujan Shakya, Guichen Liang, Yi Li, Xin Duan
{"title":"Four different fixation strategies for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: a finite element analysis.","authors":"Yuan Liu, Xiang Zhang, Aïcha Noura Yélèen Traoré, Sujan Shakya, Guichen Liang, Yi Li, Xin Duan","doi":"10.1186/s13018-026-07040-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures are complex injuries that result from high-energy trauma. Despite the availability of multiple fixation strategies, optimal surgical management remains a subject of ongoing debate and comparative biomechanical data are lacking. This study evaluated the stability of four commonly used constructs for internal fixation using patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) to provide a robust biomechanical rationale for surgical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient-specific FEA models were reconstructed using computed tomography imaging data of eight patients to simulate a complex injury pattern involving an ipsilateral Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture combined with a comminuted femoral shaft fracture. Four distinct internal fixation strategies were evaluated: proximal femoral nail antirotation, compression plate with cannulated screws, antegrade intramedullary nail with cannulated screws (AN-CS), and long proximal femoral locking plate. Stability parameters were quantified under simulated axial and torsional loading conditions to assess the mechanical performance of each construct.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under both loading conditions, the AN-CS group consistently maintained low levels of femoral and implant displacement while demonstrating a more uniform stress distribution and minimum interfragmentary motion at the femoral neck fracture site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Of the four fixation methods evaluated in this simulation study, the AN-CS construct exhibited the best biomechanical performance overall. The AN-CS fixation effectively balanced interfragmentary stability with a uniform stress distribution, thereby providing a biomechanical basis to guide subsequent clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13625483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07040-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures are complex injuries that result from high-energy trauma. Despite the availability of multiple fixation strategies, optimal surgical management remains a subject of ongoing debate and comparative biomechanical data are lacking. This study evaluated the stability of four commonly used constructs for internal fixation using patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) to provide a robust biomechanical rationale for surgical decision-making.

Methods: Patient-specific FEA models were reconstructed using computed tomography imaging data of eight patients to simulate a complex injury pattern involving an ipsilateral Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture combined with a comminuted femoral shaft fracture. Four distinct internal fixation strategies were evaluated: proximal femoral nail antirotation, compression plate with cannulated screws, antegrade intramedullary nail with cannulated screws (AN-CS), and long proximal femoral locking plate. Stability parameters were quantified under simulated axial and torsional loading conditions to assess the mechanical performance of each construct.

Results: Under both loading conditions, the AN-CS group consistently maintained low levels of femoral and implant displacement while demonstrating a more uniform stress distribution and minimum interfragmentary motion at the femoral neck fracture site.

Conclusion: Of the four fixation methods evaluated in this simulation study, the AN-CS construct exhibited the best biomechanical performance overall. The AN-CS fixation effectively balanced interfragmentary stability with a uniform stress distribution, thereby providing a biomechanical basis to guide subsequent clinical decision-making.

同侧股骨颈和股骨骨干骨折的四种不同固定策略:有限元分析。
背景:同侧股骨颈和股骨骨干骨折是由高能创伤引起的复杂损伤。尽管有多种固定策略,但最佳的手术处理仍然是一个持续争论的主题,并且缺乏比较的生物力学数据。本研究利用患者特异性有限元分析(FEA)评估了四种常用内固定装置的稳定性,为手术决策提供了强有力的生物力学依据。方法:利用8例患者的计算机断层成像数据重建患者特异性有限元模型,模拟复杂的损伤模式,包括同侧Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折合并股骨干粉碎性骨折。评估了四种不同的内固定策略:股骨近端防旋转钉、加压钢板加空心螺钉、顺行髓内钉加空心螺钉(AN-CS)和股骨近端长锁定钢板。在模拟轴向和扭转载荷条件下,量化了稳定性参数,以评估每个结构的力学性能。结果:在两种加载条件下,AN-CS组始终保持低水平的股骨和假体位移,同时在股骨颈骨折部位表现出更均匀的应力分布和最小的碎片间运动。结论:在本模拟研究中评估的四种固定方法中,AN-CS结构整体上表现出最好的生物力学性能。AN-CS固定有效地平衡了骨折块间的稳定性和均匀的应力分布,从而为指导后续临床决策提供了生物力学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书