Evaluation of the Sidekick point-of-care progesterone lateral-flow assay for use in equine reproductive management.

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Sara H McDowell, Andrew McLain, Luca Moore, Craig J Ledgerwood, Elizabeth Bailie, Tara Moore
{"title":"Evaluation of the Sidekick point-of-care progesterone lateral-flow assay for use in equine reproductive management.","authors":"Sara H McDowell, Andrew McLain, Luca Moore, Craig J Ledgerwood, Elizabeth Bailie, Tara Moore","doi":"10.1177/10406387261460834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A point-of-care (POC; stall-side) test for progesterone that delivers rapid, accurate results has the potential to transform equine reproductive care. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of a POC device (Sidekick) that incorporates a progesterone lateral-flow assay (LFA) with a reader, and compared it with established methods (radioimmunoassay [RIA] and chemiluminescence immunoassay [CLIA]). Analytical performance was assessed using serially diluted mare plasma (0-8 ng/mL progesterone) to estimate precision and percent recovery. Clinical accuracy was assessed by comparison with RIA and CLIA on 19 paired serum samples. Agreement was evaluated by regression analyses and ordinal concordance across clinically relevant progesterone bands. The LFA had excellent recovery (90-102%) across 4-8 ng/mL, strong repeatability (CV 4-15%), and high reproducibility between 2 laboratories (CV 9.9%). Ordinal agreement with reference standards was near-perfect in spiked samples (κ = 0.94) and substantial in clinical samples versus both RIA (κ = 0.77) and CLIA (κ = 0.79). Cross-reactivity with the synthetic progestin, altrenogest, was tested at pharmacologic concentrations; no cross-reactivity was detected. Limitations of our study include an observed bias, potentially caused by the matrix differing between methods (serum vs. plasma). Additionally, a narrow validated range could cause underestimation of high concentrations. The LFA in the Sidekick device provided rapid, accurate, and clinically meaningful progesterone results in mares across 4-8 ng/mL, which would enable on-the-spot decisions and avoid delays from sample processing, transport, and result reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":17579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1238-1245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13346099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387261460834","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A point-of-care (POC; stall-side) test for progesterone that delivers rapid, accurate results has the potential to transform equine reproductive care. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of a POC device (Sidekick) that incorporates a progesterone lateral-flow assay (LFA) with a reader, and compared it with established methods (radioimmunoassay [RIA] and chemiluminescence immunoassay [CLIA]). Analytical performance was assessed using serially diluted mare plasma (0-8 ng/mL progesterone) to estimate precision and percent recovery. Clinical accuracy was assessed by comparison with RIA and CLIA on 19 paired serum samples. Agreement was evaluated by regression analyses and ordinal concordance across clinically relevant progesterone bands. The LFA had excellent recovery (90-102%) across 4-8 ng/mL, strong repeatability (CV 4-15%), and high reproducibility between 2 laboratories (CV 9.9%). Ordinal agreement with reference standards was near-perfect in spiked samples (κ = 0.94) and substantial in clinical samples versus both RIA (κ = 0.77) and CLIA (κ = 0.79). Cross-reactivity with the synthetic progestin, altrenogest, was tested at pharmacologic concentrations; no cross-reactivity was detected. Limitations of our study include an observed bias, potentially caused by the matrix differing between methods (serum vs. plasma). Additionally, a narrow validated range could cause underestimation of high concentrations. The LFA in the Sidekick device provided rapid, accurate, and clinically meaningful progesterone results in mares across 4-8 ng/mL, which would enable on-the-spot decisions and avoid delays from sample processing, transport, and result reporting.

评价Sidekick护理点黄体酮横向流动试验在马生殖管理中的应用。
一种即时(POC;马厩旁)黄体酮检测能够提供快速、准确的结果,有可能改变马的生殖保健。我们评估了一种结合孕酮侧流测定(LFA)和读取器的POC设备(Sidekick)的分析和临床性能,并将其与现有方法(放射免疫测定[RIA]和化学发光免疫测定[CLIA])进行了比较。使用连续稀释的血浆(0-8 ng/mL孕酮)评估分析性能,以估计精密度和回收率。通过比较RIA和CLIA对19份配对血清样本的临床准确性进行评估。通过回归分析和临床相关孕酮带的顺序一致性来评估一致性。该方法在4-8 ng/mL范围内具有良好的回收率(90-102%),重复性强(CV 4-15%), 2个实验室间的重复性高(CV 9.9%)。在加标样品(κ = 0.94)中,与参考标准的顺序一致性接近完美,而在临床样品中,与RIA (κ = 0.77)和CLIA (κ = 0.79)相比,与参考标准的顺序一致性相当高。在药理学浓度下测试了与合成黄体酮的交叉反应性;未检测到交叉反应。本研究的局限性包括观察到的偏倚,这可能是由不同方法(血清和血浆)的基质不同引起的。此外,较窄的验证范围可能导致对高浓度的低估。Sidekick设备中的LFA在4-8 ng/mL范围内为母马提供快速、准确且具有临床意义的黄体酮结果,这将使现场决策成为可能,避免样品处理、运输和结果报告的延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation (J Vet Diagn Invest) is an international peer-reviewed journal published bimonthly in English by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD). JVDI is devoted to all aspects of veterinary laboratory diagnostic science including the major disciplines of anatomic pathology, bacteriology/mycology, clinical pathology, epidemiology, immunology, laboratory information management, molecular biology, parasitology, public health, toxicology, and virology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书