Implementing Patient Decision Aids for Insulin Initiation in China: What are the Barriers and Facilitators? A TDF-Based Qualitative Study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Dan Yang, Hongzhan Jiang, Meiqi Meng, Ziyan Wang, Wanting Shen, Hongxin Liu, Haiou Yang, Xuejing Li, Yufang Hao
{"title":"Implementing Patient Decision Aids for Insulin Initiation in China: What are the Barriers and Facilitators? A TDF-Based Qualitative Study.","authors":"Dan Yang, Hongzhan Jiang, Meiqi Meng, Ziyan Wang, Wanting Shen, Hongxin Liu, Haiou Yang, Xuejing Li, Yufang Hao","doi":"10.1155/jdr/2842572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When oral antidiabetic drugs are insufficient to achieve glycemic control in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), patients face the decision of whether to initiate insulin therapy. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) by supporting informed, preference-congruent choices about insulin initiation. However, PtDA implementation in China remains challenging, with limited understanding of context-specific barriers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study is aimed at identifying the barriers and facilitators to implementing PtDAs for supporting informed decisions about insulin initiation in T2DM management in China, from the perspectives of key interest holders (patients, endocrinologists, nurses).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semistructured interviews guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). A purposive sample of 26 participants (10 patients with T2DM, 6 physicians, and 10 nurses) was recruited from a university-affiliated hospital in Beijing. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a framework analysis approach assisted by NVivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen barriers and five facilitators were identified for healthcare professionals, whereas six barriers and five facilitators were identified for patients. Key barriers included a lack of knowledge about PtDAs and insufficient skills for their use among both groups. Notable barriers related to social/professional role and identity were found, with physicians often self-identifying as sole \"decision-makers\" and nurses expressing role ambiguity regarding SDM. The absence of reinforcement mechanisms and concerns about increased workload and limited resources were substantial organizational barriers. Facilitators included positive beliefs about PtDAs' consequences and the readiness of nurses, whose established health education practices position them as potential champions for implementation. Patients demonstrated a positive intention to use PtDAs once their purpose was understood.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a PtDA for informed decision-making about insulin initiation in T2DM patients in China is influenced by a complex array of factors. Moving beyond the common barrier of time constraints, this study highlights foundational gaps in knowledge, skills, and role alignment as primary hurdles. A multifaceted implementation strategy is essential, comprising comprehensive education and training, clear role delineation, adaptation of PtDAs to fit clinical workflows, and strong organizational commitment with integrated monitoring and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":15576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Research","volume":"2026 1","pages":"e2842572"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13343304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jdr/2842572","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When oral antidiabetic drugs are insufficient to achieve glycemic control in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), patients face the decision of whether to initiate insulin therapy. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) by supporting informed, preference-congruent choices about insulin initiation. However, PtDA implementation in China remains challenging, with limited understanding of context-specific barriers.

Objective: This study is aimed at identifying the barriers and facilitators to implementing PtDAs for supporting informed decisions about insulin initiation in T2DM management in China, from the perspectives of key interest holders (patients, endocrinologists, nurses).

Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semistructured interviews guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). A purposive sample of 26 participants (10 patients with T2DM, 6 physicians, and 10 nurses) was recruited from a university-affiliated hospital in Beijing. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a framework analysis approach assisted by NVivo.

Results: Fifteen barriers and five facilitators were identified for healthcare professionals, whereas six barriers and five facilitators were identified for patients. Key barriers included a lack of knowledge about PtDAs and insufficient skills for their use among both groups. Notable barriers related to social/professional role and identity were found, with physicians often self-identifying as sole "decision-makers" and nurses expressing role ambiguity regarding SDM. The absence of reinforcement mechanisms and concerns about increased workload and limited resources were substantial organizational barriers. Facilitators included positive beliefs about PtDAs' consequences and the readiness of nurses, whose established health education practices position them as potential champions for implementation. Patients demonstrated a positive intention to use PtDAs once their purpose was understood.

Conclusions: The implementation of a PtDA for informed decision-making about insulin initiation in T2DM patients in China is influenced by a complex array of factors. Moving beyond the common barrier of time constraints, this study highlights foundational gaps in knowledge, skills, and role alignment as primary hurdles. A multifaceted implementation strategy is essential, comprising comprehensive education and training, clear role delineation, adaptation of PtDAs to fit clinical workflows, and strong organizational commitment with integrated monitoring and support.

在中国实施胰岛素启动患者决策辅助:障碍和促进因素是什么?基于tdf的定性研究。
背景:当2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者口服降糖药不足以达到血糖控制时,患者面临是否开始胰岛素治疗的决定。患者决策辅助(ptda)促进共享决策(SDM)通过支持知情的,偏好一致的胰岛素启动选择。然而,PtDA在中国的实施仍然具有挑战性,对具体环境障碍的理解有限。目的:本研究旨在从关键利益相关者(患者、内分泌学家、护士)的角度,确定在中国实施ptda以支持T2DM管理中胰岛素启动的知情决策的障碍和促进因素。方法:在理论领域框架(TDF)的指导下,采用半结构化访谈进行定性描述性研究。从北京一所大学附属医院招募了26名参与者(10名2型糖尿病患者,6名医生和10名护士)。访谈录音,逐字转录,并使用NVivo辅助的框架分析方法进行分析。结果:针对医疗保健专业人员确定了15个障碍和5个促进因素,而针对患者确定了6个障碍和5个促进因素。主要障碍包括缺乏关于ptda的知识和在两组中使用ptda的技能不足。与社会/职业角色和身份相关的显著障碍被发现,医生经常自我认同为唯一的“决策者”,护士在SDM方面表现出角色模糊。缺乏加强机制以及对工作量增加和资源有限的关切是重大的组织障碍。促进因素包括对ptda的后果和护士的准备的积极信念,其建立的健康教育实践使其成为实施的潜在拥护者。一旦了解ptda的用途,患者就会表现出积极的使用意向。结论:PtDA在中国对T2DM患者胰岛素启动的知情决策的实施受到一系列复杂因素的影响。除了时间限制这一常见障碍之外,本研究还强调了知识、技能和角色定位方面的基本差距是主要障碍。一个多方面的实施战略是必不可少的,包括全面的教育和培训,明确的角色描述,调整ptda以适应临床工作流程,以及强有力的组织承诺,包括综合监测和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Research
Journal of Diabetes Research ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
152
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Research is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The journal welcomes submissions focusing on the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, and prevention of diabetes, as well as associated complications, such as diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书