Personalized antiplatelet therapy: are we ready for a precision medicine approach.

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Sai Praneeth Chaparala, Abhishek Hanumanpratap Singh Kshatri, Amritha Suresh, Akkshaya Suresh Kumar, Akshitha Talasila, Thaimye Joseph, Swathi Lenin Babu Naraginiti
{"title":"Personalized antiplatelet therapy: are we ready for a precision medicine approach.","authors":"Sai Praneeth Chaparala, Abhishek Hanumanpratap Singh Kshatri, Amritha Suresh, Akkshaya Suresh Kumar, Akshitha Talasila, Thaimye Joseph, Swathi Lenin Babu Naraginiti","doi":"10.1515/jbcpp-2025-0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), combining aspirin with a P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor, remains central to secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention. However, substantial interindividual variability in antiplatelet response, particularly clopidogrel resistance associated with CYP2C19 polymorphisms, has challenged the conventional \"one-size-fits-all\" approach and increased interest in precision-guided antiplatelet strategies. This narrative review synthesized literature identified through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, focusing on randomized trials, genotype-guided studies, platelet function testing (PFT), meta-analyses, guideline statements, and emerging artificial intelligence (AI)-based prediction models. Evidence suggests that genotype-guided therapy, PFT-guided treatment, and individualized DAPT duration may improve the balance between ischemic protection and bleeding risk in selected high-risk populations. However, routine implementation remains limited by inconsistent clinical outcome benefits, heterogeneous testing strategies, modest risk-score performance, cost, infrastructure barriers, and variable guideline recommendations. Precision-guided DAPT is promising, but broader adoption requires stronger prospective evidence, standardized testing pathways, and real-world validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2025-0139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), combining aspirin with a P2Y12 inhibitor, remains central to secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention. However, substantial interindividual variability in antiplatelet response, particularly clopidogrel resistance associated with CYP2C19 polymorphisms, has challenged the conventional "one-size-fits-all" approach and increased interest in precision-guided antiplatelet strategies. This narrative review synthesized literature identified through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, focusing on randomized trials, genotype-guided studies, platelet function testing (PFT), meta-analyses, guideline statements, and emerging artificial intelligence (AI)-based prediction models. Evidence suggests that genotype-guided therapy, PFT-guided treatment, and individualized DAPT duration may improve the balance between ischemic protection and bleeding risk in selected high-risk populations. However, routine implementation remains limited by inconsistent clinical outcome benefits, heterogeneous testing strategies, modest risk-score performance, cost, infrastructure barriers, and variable guideline recommendations. Precision-guided DAPT is promising, but broader adoption requires stronger prospective evidence, standardized testing pathways, and real-world validation.

个体化抗血小板治疗:我们准备好采用精准医学方法了吗?
双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT),联合阿司匹林和P2Y12抑制剂,仍然是急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后二级预防的核心。然而,抗血小板反应的个体间差异,特别是与CYP2C19多态性相关的氯吡格雷耐药性,对传统的“一刀切”方法提出了挑战,并增加了对精确指导抗血小板策略的兴趣。本文综合了通过PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar检索到的文献,重点关注随机试验、基因型引导研究、血小板功能测试(PFT)、荟萃分析、指南声明和新兴的基于人工智能(AI)的预测模型。有证据表明,基因型引导治疗、pft引导治疗和个体化DAPT持续时间可以改善特定高危人群中缺血保护和出血风险之间的平衡。然而,常规实施仍然受到不一致的临床结果获益、异质性检测策略、适度的风险评分表现、成本、基础设施障碍和可变指南建议的限制。精确引导的DAPT很有前途,但更广泛的采用需要更有力的前瞻性证据、标准化的测试途径和现实世界的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology (JBCPP) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly published journal in experimental medicine. JBCPP publishes novel research in the physiological and pharmacological sciences, including brain research; cardiovascular-pulmonary interactions; exercise; thermal control; haematology; immune response; inflammation; metabolism; oxidative stress; and phytotherapy. As the borders between physiology, pharmacology and biochemistry become increasingly blurred, we also welcome papers using cutting-edge techniques in cellular and/or molecular biology to link descriptive or behavioral studies with cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the integrative processes. Topics: Behavior and Neuroprotection, Reproduction, Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity, Vascular Conditions, Cardiovascular Function, Cardiovascular-Pulmonary Interactions, Oxidative Stress, Metabolism, Immune Response, Hematological Profile, Inflammation, Infection, Phytotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书