Molecular Characterization of Methicillin and Aminoglycoside-Resistant Staphylococcus Species from Drinking Water and Clinical Samples in Dutsin-Ma, Northwestern Nigeria.

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emmanuel Dayo Alabi, Kamala Abdullahi, Habib Suleiman Mahmud, Ayodele Timilehin Adesoji
{"title":"Molecular Characterization of Methicillin and Aminoglycoside-Resistant Staphylococcus Species from Drinking Water and Clinical Samples in Dutsin-Ma, Northwestern Nigeria.","authors":"Emmanuel Dayo Alabi, Kamala Abdullahi, Habib Suleiman Mahmud, Ayodele Timilehin Adesoji","doi":"10.1007/s44197-026-00605-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species (MRSS) are a global public health threat, causing substantial morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Understanding the characteristics of MRSS from various niches can support the control of these bacterial species. Herein, we examined the prevalence, biofilm formation, hemolytic activity, and selected aminoglycoside resistance genes in MRSS isolates from potable water and clinical samples in Dutsin-Ma, northwestern Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 200 samples, including 100 water and 100 clinical samples, were collected and analyzed. Staphylococcus species was recovered following standard microbiological procedures. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination were performed using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and microdilution methods, respectively. Methicillin-resistant isolates were defined as those resistant to cefoxitin with elevated oxacillin MICs. Coagulase production, biofilm formation, and hemolytic activity were assessed using slide coagulase test, Congo red agar and blood agar, respectively. Multidrug resistant (MDR) isolates were selected for PCR to detect tuf and selected aminoglycoside resistance genes. Fisher's exact test was performed to check for a significant difference in their occurrence (p ≤ α 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty (15%) isolates were putatively identified, comprising both coagulase-positive staphylococci (CoPS) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS): 19 (63.3%) from the clinical samples and 11 (36.7%) from the water sources. Of these, 17 strains (41.2%, 7/17) from wound swabs and 58.8% (10/17) from water samples were MDR and methicillin resistant. Virulence traits were present in isolates from both sources; however, there was no significant difference (p ≤ α 0.05) in their occurrence in CoPS and CoNS isolates from both source. Of the selected MDR strains, 16 /17 (94.1%) revealed at least one virulence trait (coagulase, hemolysis, or biofilm). PCR confirmed that 23.5% (4/17) of the selected MDR isolates exclusively from water samples harbored at least one of ant(4')-Ia, aph(2')-Ib, aph(3')-IIIa, or aac(6'), which encode aminoglycoside resistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest the potential role of potable water as a dissemination route for MDR MRSS in the study locality. Further studies are needed to identify the circulating species and sequence types (STs), and to evaluate the prevalence of other antibiotic resistance genes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13365066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-026-00605-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species (MRSS) are a global public health threat, causing substantial morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Understanding the characteristics of MRSS from various niches can support the control of these bacterial species. Herein, we examined the prevalence, biofilm formation, hemolytic activity, and selected aminoglycoside resistance genes in MRSS isolates from potable water and clinical samples in Dutsin-Ma, northwestern Nigeria.

Methods: A total of 200 samples, including 100 water and 100 clinical samples, were collected and analyzed. Staphylococcus species was recovered following standard microbiological procedures. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination were performed using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and microdilution methods, respectively. Methicillin-resistant isolates were defined as those resistant to cefoxitin with elevated oxacillin MICs. Coagulase production, biofilm formation, and hemolytic activity were assessed using slide coagulase test, Congo red agar and blood agar, respectively. Multidrug resistant (MDR) isolates were selected for PCR to detect tuf and selected aminoglycoside resistance genes. Fisher's exact test was performed to check for a significant difference in their occurrence (p ≤ α 0.05).

Results: Thirty (15%) isolates were putatively identified, comprising both coagulase-positive staphylococci (CoPS) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS): 19 (63.3%) from the clinical samples and 11 (36.7%) from the water sources. Of these, 17 strains (41.2%, 7/17) from wound swabs and 58.8% (10/17) from water samples were MDR and methicillin resistant. Virulence traits were present in isolates from both sources; however, there was no significant difference (p ≤ α 0.05) in their occurrence in CoPS and CoNS isolates from both source. Of the selected MDR strains, 16 /17 (94.1%) revealed at least one virulence trait (coagulase, hemolysis, or biofilm). PCR confirmed that 23.5% (4/17) of the selected MDR isolates exclusively from water samples harbored at least one of ant(4')-Ia, aph(2')-Ib, aph(3')-IIIa, or aac(6'), which encode aminoglycoside resistance.

Conclusion: These findings suggest the potential role of potable water as a dissemination route for MDR MRSS in the study locality. Further studies are needed to identify the circulating species and sequence types (STs), and to evaluate the prevalence of other antibiotic resistance genes.

尼日利亚西北部Dutsin-Ma地区饮用水和临床样品中耐甲氧西林和氨基糖苷类葡萄球菌的分子特征
背景:耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌(MRSS)是全球公共卫生威胁,造成大量发病率、死亡率和经济负担。了解不同生态位的MRSS的特征可以帮助控制这些细菌种类。在此,我们检测了尼日利亚西北部Dutsin-Ma饮用水和临床样本中MRSS分离株的患病率、生物膜形成、溶血活性和氨基糖苷耐药基因。方法:采集200份样本,其中水样100份,临床样100份。葡萄球菌种类是按照标准微生物程序回收的。采用Kirby-Bauer纸片扩散法和微量稀释法分别进行药敏试验(AST)和最低抑菌浓度(MIC)测定。耐甲氧西林的分离株被定义为对头孢西林耐药且氧西林mic升高的分离株。分别用滑动凝固酶试验、刚果红琼脂和血琼脂评价凝固酶的产生、生物膜的形成和溶血活性。选择多药耐药(MDR)菌株进行PCR检测tuf和选定的氨基糖苷类耐药基因。采用Fisher精确检验检验其发生率是否有显著性差异(p≤α 0.05)。结果:推定鉴定出凝固酶阳性葡萄球菌(cop)和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(con)共30株(15%),其中临床样品19株(63.3%),水源11株(36.7%)。其中伤口拭子17株(41.2%,7/17)和水样58.8%(10/17)耐多药和甲氧西林。两种来源的分离株均存在毒力性状;但两种来源的cop和CoNS分离株的发生率无显著差异(p≤α 0.05)。在所选的MDR菌株中,16 /17(94.1%)至少表现出一种毒力性状(凝固酶、溶血或生物膜)。PCR结果显示,23.5%(4/17)的MDR水样分离株至少含有一种编码氨基糖苷抗性的ant(4’)-Ia、aph(2’)-Ib、aph(3’)-IIIa或aac(6’)基因。结论:这些发现提示饮用水可能是研究地区MDR MRSS的传播途径。需要进一步研究以确定流行的菌种和序列类型(STs),并评估其他抗生素耐药基因的流行情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
57
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health is an esteemed international publication, offering a platform for peer-reviewed articles that drive advancements in global epidemiology and international health. Our mission is to shape global health policy by showcasing cutting-edge scholarship and innovative strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书