A critical review of autopsy findings in cases of suicidal hanging and the effect of a layered neck dissection.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
International Journal of Legal Medicine Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-08 DOI:10.1007/s00414-026-03917-8
James Robert Lyness, Guy Rutty, Jane Rutty, Michael Biggs
{"title":"A critical review of autopsy findings in cases of suicidal hanging and the effect of a layered neck dissection.","authors":"James Robert Lyness, Guy Rutty, Jane Rutty, Michael Biggs","doi":"10.1007/s00414-026-03917-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicidal hanging is a common case type referred to death investigation services throughout the world. It is associated with a large number of autopsy findings, but the presentation can vary significantly between cases, based on a multitude of factors related to the decedent, ligature and degree of suspension. There is also considerable variation in the reported incidence of autopsy findings within the published literature, some of which may be explained by different anthropometric characteristics of the included cases. However, study design and the thoroughness of the autopsy examination undertaken also undoubtedly influence results. This study therefore aimed to retrospectively review a series of autopsy reports from cases of suicidal hanging to assess not only the incidence of common findings identified during Coronial autopsies recently undertaken within a single region of the United Kingdom (UK), but also how the quality or thoroughness of the examination influenced their rate of detection. The results demonstrated considerable variation in the detection rates of common autopsy findings between individual consultant forensic pathologists and that the detection of neck muscle bruising (p = < 0.001), hyoid bone fractures (p = < 0.001) and thyroid cartilage fractures (p = 0.009) was greater when a layered neck dissection was undertaken. As a secondary objective, the range, incidence and impact of any natural disease and trauma additional to the ligature mark identified during the autopsy were assessed. Despite the array of natural disease and trauma recorded, none was considered critical to providing the underlying primary medical cause of death to the Coroner.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3775-3785"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-026-03917-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicidal hanging is a common case type referred to death investigation services throughout the world. It is associated with a large number of autopsy findings, but the presentation can vary significantly between cases, based on a multitude of factors related to the decedent, ligature and degree of suspension. There is also considerable variation in the reported incidence of autopsy findings within the published literature, some of which may be explained by different anthropometric characteristics of the included cases. However, study design and the thoroughness of the autopsy examination undertaken also undoubtedly influence results. This study therefore aimed to retrospectively review a series of autopsy reports from cases of suicidal hanging to assess not only the incidence of common findings identified during Coronial autopsies recently undertaken within a single region of the United Kingdom (UK), but also how the quality or thoroughness of the examination influenced their rate of detection. The results demonstrated considerable variation in the detection rates of common autopsy findings between individual consultant forensic pathologists and that the detection of neck muscle bruising (p = < 0.001), hyoid bone fractures (p = < 0.001) and thyroid cartilage fractures (p = 0.009) was greater when a layered neck dissection was undertaken. As a secondary objective, the range, incidence and impact of any natural disease and trauma additional to the ligature mark identified during the autopsy were assessed. Despite the array of natural disease and trauma recorded, none was considered critical to providing the underlying primary medical cause of death to the Coroner.

对自杀上吊案件的尸检结果和分层颈部解剖的效果进行了批判性回顾。
自杀式上吊是世界各地死亡调查机构提及的一种常见案件类型。它与大量的尸检结果有关,但根据与死者、结扎和悬吊程度有关的多种因素,不同病例的表现可能有很大差异。在已发表的文献中,报告的尸检结果的发生率也存在相当大的差异,其中一些可能是由所包括病例的不同人体测量特征来解释的。然而,研究设计和解剖检查的彻底性无疑也会影响结果。因此,本研究旨在回顾性审查一系列自杀上吊案件的尸检报告,不仅评估最近在联合王国(UK)一个地区进行的冠状尸检中发现的常见发现的发生率,而且还评估检查的质量或彻彻性如何影响其检出率。结果表明,在不同的法医顾问病理学家之间,常见尸检结果的检出率存在相当大的差异,而颈部肌肉瘀伤的检出率(p =
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书