Ionizing Radiation Hazard for Laser Material Processing Applications Using an Ultrashort Pulse Laser.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Henry Tran, Mike Woods, James Liu, Sayed Rokni, Pi-En Tsai, Hortense Allegre, Norman Hodgson
{"title":"Ionizing Radiation Hazard for Laser Material Processing Applications Using an Ultrashort Pulse Laser.","authors":"Henry Tran, Mike Woods, James Liu, Sayed Rokni, Pi-En Tsai, Hortense Allegre, Norman Hodgson","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000002186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ionizing radiation hazards from material processing using an ultrashort pulsed laser at high rep rates, which emits bremsstrahlung x rays below 10 keV, were measured with survey meters and passive dosimeters. A laser-optic system was set up to scan thin tungsten foils at six laser intensities between 1013 and 1015 W cm-2, which were characterized in this study. Ssurvey meters with open beta slide and closed beta slide configurations, as well as dosimeters, were used (at different distances and directions) to measure shallow and deep dose rates, respectively. The default dose algorithm and the dose algorithm developed from this study were both used to convert the element signals to H'(0.07) and H*(10). Irradiations with standard x-ray beams were used to derive the calibration factors of survey meter and dosimeter for the low-energy laser-induced x-ray beams. Additional corrections, such as air attenuation and volume effect needed for meter response, were also made. Survey meters show shallow dose rates ranging from 10 mSv h-1 W-1 at 2.8 × 1015 W cm-2 down to 1 mSv h-1 W-1 at 6.6 × 1013 W cm-2 at 28 cm. The deep dose rates are at least a factor of 10 lower than the shallow dose rates. With corrections, dosimeters measured shallow doses of 42 mSv h-1 W-1 at 2.8 × 1015 W cm-2 at a distance of 12 cm, which were comparable to 77 mSv h-1 W-1 measured by survey meters. Uncertainties associated with deep dose measurements were much higher than those for shallow doses, and shallow dose uncertainties are higher for the dosimeter than for the survey meter. Dosimeters have difficulty in measuring shallow doses at lower intensities and deep doses at all intensities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000002186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ionizing radiation hazards from material processing using an ultrashort pulsed laser at high rep rates, which emits bremsstrahlung x rays below 10 keV, were measured with survey meters and passive dosimeters. A laser-optic system was set up to scan thin tungsten foils at six laser intensities between 1013 and 1015 W cm-2, which were characterized in this study. Ssurvey meters with open beta slide and closed beta slide configurations, as well as dosimeters, were used (at different distances and directions) to measure shallow and deep dose rates, respectively. The default dose algorithm and the dose algorithm developed from this study were both used to convert the element signals to H'(0.07) and H*(10). Irradiations with standard x-ray beams were used to derive the calibration factors of survey meter and dosimeter for the low-energy laser-induced x-ray beams. Additional corrections, such as air attenuation and volume effect needed for meter response, were also made. Survey meters show shallow dose rates ranging from 10 mSv h-1 W-1 at 2.8 × 1015 W cm-2 down to 1 mSv h-1 W-1 at 6.6 × 1013 W cm-2 at 28 cm. The deep dose rates are at least a factor of 10 lower than the shallow dose rates. With corrections, dosimeters measured shallow doses of 42 mSv h-1 W-1 at 2.8 × 1015 W cm-2 at a distance of 12 cm, which were comparable to 77 mSv h-1 W-1 measured by survey meters. Uncertainties associated with deep dose measurements were much higher than those for shallow doses, and shallow dose uncertainties are higher for the dosimeter than for the survey meter. Dosimeters have difficulty in measuring shallow doses at lower intensities and deep doses at all intensities.

使用超短脉冲激光加工激光材料的电离辐射危害。
采用测量仪和被动剂量计测量了高频率超短脉冲激光加工材料产生的电离辐射危害,该激光发射的轫致辐射x射线低于10 keV。建立了激光光学系统,在1013 ~ 1015 W cm-2的6种激光强度下对薄钨箔进行扫描,并对其进行了表征。在不同的距离和方向上,分别使用开放和封闭玻片结构的测量仪以及剂量计来测量浅层和深层剂量率。使用默认剂量算法和本研究开发的剂量算法将元素信号转换为H′(0.07)和H*(10)。采用标准x射线束辐照法,推导了低能激光诱导x射线束测量仪和剂量仪的标定系数。此外,还进行了额外的校正,如空气衰减和仪表响应所需的体积效应。测量仪表显示浅剂量率范围从2.8 × 1015 W cm-2的10 mSv h-1 W-1到28 cm的6.6 × 1013 W cm-2的1 mSv h-1 W-1。深剂量率至少比浅剂量率低10倍。经校正后,剂量计在距离12厘米处以2.8 × 1015 W cm-2测量到42 mSv h-1 W-1的浅层剂量,与测量仪测量到的77 mSv h-1 W-1相当。与深剂量测量有关的不确定度远高于浅剂量测量,剂量计的浅剂量不确定度也高于调查仪。剂量计难以测量较低强度下的浅剂量和所有强度下的深剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书