Diurnal Variations and Test–Retest Reliability of Resting-State Functional MRI Metrics

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Bowen Guo, Kaikai Yan, Zhihui Liu, Yao Deng, Shanna Fu, Weiwei Zhao, Jing Xu, Caihong Jiang, Ruiwen Tao, Xing Chen, Mengmeng Wang, Tianxin Mao, Hengyi Rao
{"title":"Diurnal Variations and Test–Retest Reliability of Resting-State Functional MRI Metrics","authors":"Bowen Guo,&nbsp;Kaikai Yan,&nbsp;Zhihui Liu,&nbsp;Yao Deng,&nbsp;Shanna Fu,&nbsp;Weiwei Zhao,&nbsp;Jing Xu,&nbsp;Caihong Jiang,&nbsp;Ruiwen Tao,&nbsp;Xing Chen,&nbsp;Mengmeng Wang,&nbsp;Tianxin Mao,&nbsp;Hengyi Rao","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) is widely used to assess intrinsic brain activity, yet concerns about its test–retest reliability and reproducibility persist. Circadian rhythms strongly influence brain physiology, but their impact on rs-fMRI reliability remains poorly understood. In this study, we scanned 39 healthy young adults six times within a single day (08:00–20:00) under standardized conditions. For each session, we computed four common rs-fMRI metrics, including amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), wavelet-transformed ALFF (wALFF), fractional ALFF (fALFF), and regional homogeneity (ReHo), and assessed reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ReHo showed relatively higher and more stable reliability across sessions, whereas amplitude-based metrics, particularly fALFF, exhibited greater diurnal variation. Both network-level and region-specific analyses revealed low reliability in the limbic and subcortical structures, with a mid-morning dip at 10:00. Moreover, ICCs for ALFF, wALFF, and fALFF declined with increasing inter-scan intervals, whereas ReHo remained robust. These findings demonstrate diurnal fluctuations in rs-fMRI reliability, with different metrics exhibiting distinct temporal stability profiles. We recommend that scan timing and circadian influences should be explicitly considered in the design, analysis, and interpretation of future rs-fMRI studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"47 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70590","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) is widely used to assess intrinsic brain activity, yet concerns about its test–retest reliability and reproducibility persist. Circadian rhythms strongly influence brain physiology, but their impact on rs-fMRI reliability remains poorly understood. In this study, we scanned 39 healthy young adults six times within a single day (08:00–20:00) under standardized conditions. For each session, we computed four common rs-fMRI metrics, including amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), wavelet-transformed ALFF (wALFF), fractional ALFF (fALFF), and regional homogeneity (ReHo), and assessed reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ReHo showed relatively higher and more stable reliability across sessions, whereas amplitude-based metrics, particularly fALFF, exhibited greater diurnal variation. Both network-level and region-specific analyses revealed low reliability in the limbic and subcortical structures, with a mid-morning dip at 10:00. Moreover, ICCs for ALFF, wALFF, and fALFF declined with increasing inter-scan intervals, whereas ReHo remained robust. These findings demonstrate diurnal fluctuations in rs-fMRI reliability, with different metrics exhibiting distinct temporal stability profiles. We recommend that scan timing and circadian influences should be explicitly considered in the design, analysis, and interpretation of future rs-fMRI studies.

Abstract Image

静息状态功能MRI指标的日变化和重测信度。
静息状态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)被广泛用于评估大脑内在活动,但对其测试-重测可靠性和可重复性的担忧一直存在。昼夜节律强烈影响大脑生理,但其对rs-fMRI可靠性的影响尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们在标准化条件下对39名健康青年在一天内(08:00-20:00)进行了6次扫描。对于每一次实验,我们计算了四种常见的rs-fMRI指标,包括低频波动幅度(ALFF)、小波变换ALFF (wALFF)、分数ALFF (fALFF)和区域均匀性(ReHo),并使用类内相关系数(ICCs)评估可靠性。ReHo在会话中表现出相对较高和更稳定的可靠性,而基于振幅的指标,特别是fALFF,表现出更大的日变化。网络水平和特定区域的分析都显示,边缘和皮层下结构的可靠性较低,上午10点左右下降。此外,ALFF、wALFF和fALFF的ICCs随着扫描间隔的增加而下降,而ReHo保持稳健。这些发现证明了rs-fMRI可靠性的日波动,不同的指标表现出不同的时间稳定性特征。我们建议在未来rs-fMRI研究的设计、分析和解释中应明确考虑扫描时间和昼夜节律的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书