{"title":"Diurnal Variations and Test–Retest Reliability of Resting-State Functional MRI Metrics","authors":"Bowen Guo, Kaikai Yan, Zhihui Liu, Yao Deng, Shanna Fu, Weiwei Zhao, Jing Xu, Caihong Jiang, Ruiwen Tao, Xing Chen, Mengmeng Wang, Tianxin Mao, Hengyi Rao","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) is widely used to assess intrinsic brain activity, yet concerns about its test–retest reliability and reproducibility persist. Circadian rhythms strongly influence brain physiology, but their impact on rs-fMRI reliability remains poorly understood. In this study, we scanned 39 healthy young adults six times within a single day (08:00–20:00) under standardized conditions. For each session, we computed four common rs-fMRI metrics, including amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), wavelet-transformed ALFF (wALFF), fractional ALFF (fALFF), and regional homogeneity (ReHo), and assessed reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ReHo showed relatively higher and more stable reliability across sessions, whereas amplitude-based metrics, particularly fALFF, exhibited greater diurnal variation. Both network-level and region-specific analyses revealed low reliability in the limbic and subcortical structures, with a mid-morning dip at 10:00. Moreover, ICCs for ALFF, wALFF, and fALFF declined with increasing inter-scan intervals, whereas ReHo remained robust. These findings demonstrate diurnal fluctuations in rs-fMRI reliability, with different metrics exhibiting distinct temporal stability profiles. We recommend that scan timing and circadian influences should be explicitly considered in the design, analysis, and interpretation of future rs-fMRI studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"47 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70590","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) is widely used to assess intrinsic brain activity, yet concerns about its test–retest reliability and reproducibility persist. Circadian rhythms strongly influence brain physiology, but their impact on rs-fMRI reliability remains poorly understood. In this study, we scanned 39 healthy young adults six times within a single day (08:00–20:00) under standardized conditions. For each session, we computed four common rs-fMRI metrics, including amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), wavelet-transformed ALFF (wALFF), fractional ALFF (fALFF), and regional homogeneity (ReHo), and assessed reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ReHo showed relatively higher and more stable reliability across sessions, whereas amplitude-based metrics, particularly fALFF, exhibited greater diurnal variation. Both network-level and region-specific analyses revealed low reliability in the limbic and subcortical structures, with a mid-morning dip at 10:00. Moreover, ICCs for ALFF, wALFF, and fALFF declined with increasing inter-scan intervals, whereas ReHo remained robust. These findings demonstrate diurnal fluctuations in rs-fMRI reliability, with different metrics exhibiting distinct temporal stability profiles. We recommend that scan timing and circadian influences should be explicitly considered in the design, analysis, and interpretation of future rs-fMRI studies.
期刊介绍:
Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged.
Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.