Individual preferences for the design of a health coaching-based lifestyle promotion program among middle-aged adults in Hong Kong: a discrete choice experiment.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kailu Wang, Cassie Cheuk Ling Lee, Gengcong Qu, Cyrus Tak Ka Tang, Hei Hang Edmund Yiu, Xue Yang, Carmen Ka Man Wong, Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong, Benjamin Hon Kei Yip
{"title":"Individual preferences for the design of a health coaching-based lifestyle promotion program among middle-aged adults in Hong Kong: a discrete choice experiment.","authors":"Kailu Wang, Cassie Cheuk Ling Lee, Gengcong Qu, Cyrus Tak Ka Tang, Hei Hang Edmund Yiu, Xue Yang, Carmen Ka Man Wong, Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong, Benjamin Hon Kei Yip","doi":"10.1186/s12955-026-02584-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Health coaching is an effective approach to motivating lifestyle modifications and preventing the onset of non-communicable diseases. This study aims to examine middle-aged adults' preferences for health coaching programs to improve public acceptance of these programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among adults aged 35-59 years in Hong Kong who were recruited from a population-based cohort established to evaluate outcomes related to long COVID. The DCE attributes and levels were selected based on a literature review and qualitative interviews (n = 10) with users and providers from a local health coaching program. The selected attributes included program duration, delivery mode of coaching sessions, frequency of coaching sessions, availability of blood tests, core program format, smartwatch usage, and out-of-pocket payment. An online survey with 10 choice sets was conducted to collect participants' choices regarding health coaching services with (copayment scenario, 10 choices) and without out-of-pocket payment (no copayment scenario, 10 choices). A mixed logit model and a latent class model were used for the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 912 responses were collected, of which 554 valid records were included in the analysis. In the copayment scenario, participants preferred programs that provided a smartwatch and a lower copayment rate. In the no copayment scenario, participants preferred a moderate coaching frequency, communication via phone calls or text messages, and provision of a smartwatch. Distinct preference groups were identified, including those who preferred face-to-face versus remote modes of delivery, high versus low contact frequency, and those who were sensitive versus insensitive to cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lower copayment and smartwatch provision improve acceptance of health coaching programs. Substantial preference heterogeneity for program duration, health coaching frequency, and delivery mode was found. While material incentives are important for improving acceptance of health coaching, considerable preference heterogeneity for non-monetary attributes suggests that options for health coaching program intensity can be offered along with subsidies or lower out-of-pocket payment to promote these services.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02584-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Health coaching is an effective approach to motivating lifestyle modifications and preventing the onset of non-communicable diseases. This study aims to examine middle-aged adults' preferences for health coaching programs to improve public acceptance of these programs.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among adults aged 35-59 years in Hong Kong who were recruited from a population-based cohort established to evaluate outcomes related to long COVID. The DCE attributes and levels were selected based on a literature review and qualitative interviews (n = 10) with users and providers from a local health coaching program. The selected attributes included program duration, delivery mode of coaching sessions, frequency of coaching sessions, availability of blood tests, core program format, smartwatch usage, and out-of-pocket payment. An online survey with 10 choice sets was conducted to collect participants' choices regarding health coaching services with (copayment scenario, 10 choices) and without out-of-pocket payment (no copayment scenario, 10 choices). A mixed logit model and a latent class model were used for the analysis.

Results: A total of 912 responses were collected, of which 554 valid records were included in the analysis. In the copayment scenario, participants preferred programs that provided a smartwatch and a lower copayment rate. In the no copayment scenario, participants preferred a moderate coaching frequency, communication via phone calls or text messages, and provision of a smartwatch. Distinct preference groups were identified, including those who preferred face-to-face versus remote modes of delivery, high versus low contact frequency, and those who were sensitive versus insensitive to cost.

Conclusions: Lower copayment and smartwatch provision improve acceptance of health coaching programs. Substantial preference heterogeneity for program duration, health coaching frequency, and delivery mode was found. While material incentives are important for improving acceptance of health coaching, considerable preference heterogeneity for non-monetary attributes suggests that options for health coaching program intensity can be offered along with subsidies or lower out-of-pocket payment to promote these services.

基于健康教练的香港中年人生活方式促进计划设计的个人偏好:离散选择实验。
目标:健康指导是促进改变生活方式和预防非传染性疾病发病的有效方法。本研究旨在调查中年人对健康辅导课程的偏好,以提高公众对这些课程的接受度。方法:对香港35-59岁的成年人进行离散选择实验(DCE),这些成年人来自一个以人群为基础的队列,该队列旨在评估长期COVID相关的结果。DCE属性和水平的选择是基于文献综述和对当地健康指导计划的用户和提供者的定性访谈(n = 10)。选择的属性包括课程持续时间、培训课程的交付模式、培训课程的频率、血液测试的可用性、核心课程格式、智能手表的使用情况和自付费用。通过10个选择集的在线调查,收集参与者对有(共付方案,10个选择)和无自付方案(无共付方案,10个选择)的健康指导服务的选择。使用混合logit模型和潜在类别模型进行分析。结果:共收集问卷912份,其中有效记录554份纳入分析。在共同支付方案中,参与者更喜欢提供智能手表和较低共同支付率的方案。在没有共同付费的情况下,参与者更喜欢适度的教练频率,通过电话或短信交流,并提供智能手表。我们发现了不同的偏好群体,包括那些喜欢面对面与远程交付模式的人,高与低接触频率的人,以及那些对成本敏感与不敏感的人。结论:较低的共付费用和智能手表的提供提高了健康指导项目的接受度。在项目持续时间、健康指导频率和交付方式上发现了实质性的偏好异质性。虽然物质激励对提高健康指导的接受度很重要,但非金钱属性的显著偏好异质性表明,健康指导项目强度的选择可以与补贴或较低的自付费用一起提供,以促进这些服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书