Koreddi A Dora, Vaka Rajashekhar, Mahadevapura R Kaushik, Gaurav Vora, Arti Sarin, Amol Patel
{"title":"Perspectives and preferences on palliative chemotherapy-immunotherapy in gallbladder cancer patients.","authors":"Koreddi A Dora, Vaka Rajashekhar, Mahadevapura R Kaushik, Gaurav Vora, Arti Sarin, Amol Patel","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2026.2111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients' perspective and preferences about the chemotherapy are not known. This study investigates the perspectives and treatment preferences of Indian gallbladder (GBC) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective 18-month study at a tertiary cancer center in Mumbai enrolled patients with histologically confirmed GBC receiving palliative chemotherapy, who were counselled in a structured format regarding disease, treatment options, outcomes and drug costs. Data were collected through structured interviews using quality-of-life and decision-making questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse patient responses. A pilot sample of 30 patients was used to assess whether ≥90% prioritise survival as the primary expectation from chemo-immunotherapy. Using an exact one-sided binomial design, ≤23 responses favouring survival would indicate the proportion is <90% and warrant further study. We also evaluated the psychological distress among these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 30 participants (56.67% female), 83.33% were of advanced stage. Baseline demographics is depicted. Treatment priorities varied: 40% preferred life prolongation, 23.33% favoured symptom relief and 36.67% valued both equally. Financial burden strongly influenced decisions about immunotherapy, only 6.67% were willing to pay ₹35 lakhs out-of-pocket for a 1.5-month gain, while 100% would take treatment if it were government-funded. Emotional distress was significant, with a mean NCCN score of 6.21 ± 1.80. Major concerns included financial strain (42%), fear (45%) and depression (33%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Twenty-three percent of patients favoured only symptom relief as a treatment when they were educated about the outcomes. A larger study is warranted to further consolidate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"20 ","pages":"2111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13338336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2026.2111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients' perspective and preferences about the chemotherapy are not known. This study investigates the perspectives and treatment preferences of Indian gallbladder (GBC) patients.
Methods: A prospective 18-month study at a tertiary cancer center in Mumbai enrolled patients with histologically confirmed GBC receiving palliative chemotherapy, who were counselled in a structured format regarding disease, treatment options, outcomes and drug costs. Data were collected through structured interviews using quality-of-life and decision-making questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse patient responses. A pilot sample of 30 patients was used to assess whether ≥90% prioritise survival as the primary expectation from chemo-immunotherapy. Using an exact one-sided binomial design, ≤23 responses favouring survival would indicate the proportion is <90% and warrant further study. We also evaluated the psychological distress among these patients.
Results: Among 30 participants (56.67% female), 83.33% were of advanced stage. Baseline demographics is depicted. Treatment priorities varied: 40% preferred life prolongation, 23.33% favoured symptom relief and 36.67% valued both equally. Financial burden strongly influenced decisions about immunotherapy, only 6.67% were willing to pay ₹35 lakhs out-of-pocket for a 1.5-month gain, while 100% would take treatment if it were government-funded. Emotional distress was significant, with a mean NCCN score of 6.21 ± 1.80. Major concerns included financial strain (42%), fear (45%) and depression (33%).
Conclusion: Twenty-three percent of patients favoured only symptom relief as a treatment when they were educated about the outcomes. A larger study is warranted to further consolidate our findings.