Perspectives and preferences on palliative chemotherapy-immunotherapy in gallbladder cancer patients.

IF 1.5 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2026-04-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2026.2111
Koreddi A Dora, Vaka Rajashekhar, Mahadevapura R Kaushik, Gaurav Vora, Arti Sarin, Amol Patel
{"title":"Perspectives and preferences on palliative chemotherapy-immunotherapy in gallbladder cancer patients.","authors":"Koreddi A Dora, Vaka Rajashekhar, Mahadevapura R Kaushik, Gaurav Vora, Arti Sarin, Amol Patel","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2026.2111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients' perspective and preferences about the chemotherapy are not known. This study investigates the perspectives and treatment preferences of Indian gallbladder (GBC) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective 18-month study at a tertiary cancer center in Mumbai enrolled patients with histologically confirmed GBC receiving palliative chemotherapy, who were counselled in a structured format regarding disease, treatment options, outcomes and drug costs. Data were collected through structured interviews using quality-of-life and decision-making questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse patient responses. A pilot sample of 30 patients was used to assess whether ≥90% prioritise survival as the primary expectation from chemo-immunotherapy. Using an exact one-sided binomial design, ≤23 responses favouring survival would indicate the proportion is <90% and warrant further study. We also evaluated the psychological distress among these patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 30 participants (56.67% female), 83.33% were of advanced stage. Baseline demographics is depicted. Treatment priorities varied: 40% preferred life prolongation, 23.33% favoured symptom relief and 36.67% valued both equally. Financial burden strongly influenced decisions about immunotherapy, only 6.67% were willing to pay ₹35 lakhs out-of-pocket for a 1.5-month gain, while 100% would take treatment if it were government-funded. Emotional distress was significant, with a mean NCCN score of 6.21 ± 1.80. Major concerns included financial strain (42%), fear (45%) and depression (33%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Twenty-three percent of patients favoured only symptom relief as a treatment when they were educated about the outcomes. A larger study is warranted to further consolidate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"20 ","pages":"2111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13338336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2026.2111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients' perspective and preferences about the chemotherapy are not known. This study investigates the perspectives and treatment preferences of Indian gallbladder (GBC) patients.

Methods: A prospective 18-month study at a tertiary cancer center in Mumbai enrolled patients with histologically confirmed GBC receiving palliative chemotherapy, who were counselled in a structured format regarding disease, treatment options, outcomes and drug costs. Data were collected through structured interviews using quality-of-life and decision-making questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse patient responses. A pilot sample of 30 patients was used to assess whether ≥90% prioritise survival as the primary expectation from chemo-immunotherapy. Using an exact one-sided binomial design, ≤23 responses favouring survival would indicate the proportion is <90% and warrant further study. We also evaluated the psychological distress among these patients.

Results: Among 30 participants (56.67% female), 83.33% were of advanced stage. Baseline demographics is depicted. Treatment priorities varied: 40% preferred life prolongation, 23.33% favoured symptom relief and 36.67% valued both equally. Financial burden strongly influenced decisions about immunotherapy, only 6.67% were willing to pay ₹35 lakhs out-of-pocket for a 1.5-month gain, while 100% would take treatment if it were government-funded. Emotional distress was significant, with a mean NCCN score of 6.21 ± 1.80. Major concerns included financial strain (42%), fear (45%) and depression (33%).

Conclusion: Twenty-three percent of patients favoured only symptom relief as a treatment when they were educated about the outcomes. A larger study is warranted to further consolidate our findings.

姑息性化疗-免疫治疗在胆囊癌患者中的前景和偏好。
背景:患者对化疗的看法和偏好尚不清楚。本研究探讨印度胆囊(GBC)患者的观点和治疗偏好。方法:在孟买的一个三级癌症中心进行了一项为期18个月的前瞻性研究,招募了组织学证实的GBC患者,接受姑息性化疗,以结构化的形式向他们提供有关疾病、治疗方案、结局和药物成本的咨询。数据是通过使用生活质量和决策问卷的结构化访谈收集的。采用描述性统计分析患者反应。30例患者的试点样本被用来评估≥90%的患者是否优先考虑生存作为化疗免疫治疗的主要期望。采用精确的单侧二项设计,≤23个反应有利于生存,则表明该比例为:结果:30名参与者中,女性占56.67%,晚期占83.33%。描述了基线人口统计数据。治疗的优先顺序各不相同:40%的人倾向于延长生命,23.33%的人倾向于缓解症状,36.67%的人认为两者相同。经济负担强烈影响了免疫治疗的决定,只有6.67%的人愿意为1.5个月的收益支付350万卢比的自掏腰包,而100%的人愿意接受政府资助的治疗。情绪困扰显著,NCCN平均评分为6.21±1.80。主要的担忧包括经济压力(42%)、恐惧(45%)和抑郁(33%)。结论:23%的患者在被告知治疗结果后只倾向于缓解症状。有必要进行更大规模的研究来进一步巩固我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书